Incisional Wound Vac in Obese Patients

NCT ID: NCT00789659

Last Updated: 2017-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is the belief of the investigators that the current trends in complication rates associated with fixation of pelvic ring injuries and acetabular fractures in the obese are unacceptable. The overwhelming majority of these complications can be attributed to problems with surgical wound healing. The investigators feel that if a cost effective and easily performed intervention can be prospectively utilized in a specific at-risk orthopaedic trauma population in order to control a potentially devastating complication, then efforts in discovering such an intervention may prove valuable. It is our hypothesis that obese patients treated with V.A.C. therapy after standard closure of trauma-related, operative orthopaedic incisions will have fewer postoperative wound complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Obesity has been shown to be an independent risk factor for postoperative surgical infections in a variety of obesity related and non-obesity related surgeries. With the risk of an increasingly more obese society, complication rates that significantly differ based on patients' relative obesity may become increasingly unacceptable. The purpose of the proposed prospective study is to evaluate the role that vacuum assisted closure (VAC) may play in reducing these complication rates. Negative pressure or vacuum assisted closure was first introduced in 1997 as a way to control and potentially treat chronic wounds. Since that time, the indications have exploded to include a variety of chronic and acute wound healing problems. We have anecdotally been using VAC therapy (V.A.C.;KCI, San Antonio, Texas) in an effort to control the postoperative draining that is nearly ubiquitous in our morbidly obese orthopaedic trauma patients. The V.A.C. dressing is applied to the acute postoperative wound and maintained during the immediate postoperative period. Although a novel approach to the use of the V.A.C., this use has been previously reported in the orthopaedic literature as a case series. To our knowledge, there has not been a prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the immediate placement of a V.A.C. dressing on postoperative wound infection rates in the setting of the morbidly obese orthopaedic trauma patient. It is our hypothesis that obese patients treated with V.A.C. therapy after standard closure of trauma-related, operative orthopaedic incisions will have fewer postoperative wound complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wound Infection Postoperative Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VAC dressing

The patients whose postoperative wound will be dressed with a negative pressure (V.A.C.) dressing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Negative pressure dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

A completely occlusive dressing that is attached to a device that allows a constant negative pressure of 125 mmHg to be generated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Negative pressure dressing

A completely occlusive dressing that is attached to a device that allows a constant negative pressure of 125 mmHg to be generated.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

V.A.C.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients between the ages of 18 - 64
* Patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 30
* Patients with acetabular, pelvic ring, or proximal femur fractures with a degree of displacement that would require an open reduction for treatment under normal circumstances

* Abdominal or urological surgery during the same hospital admission
* Ipsilateral soft tissue injuries that can be classified as internal degloving injuries
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orthopaedic Trauma Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Mississippi Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew Graves, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baugh N, Zuelzer H, Meador J, Blankenship J. Wound wise: wounds in surgical patients who are obese. Am J Nurs. 2007 Jun;107(6):40-50; quiz 51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000271848.07721.24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17519604 (View on PubMed)

Canturk Z, Canturk NZ, Cetinarslan B, Utkan NZ, Tarkun I. Nosocomial infections and obesity in surgical patients. Obes Res. 2003 Jun;11(6):769-75. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.107.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12805398 (View on PubMed)

Falagas ME, Kompoti M. Obesity and infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;6(7):438-46. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70523-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16790384 (View on PubMed)

Fleischmann E, Kurz A, Niedermayr M, Schebesta K, Kimberger O, Sessler DI, Kabon B, Prager G. Tissue oxygenation in obese and non-obese patients during laparoscopy. Obes Surg. 2005 Jun-Jul;15(6):813-9. doi: 10.1381/0960892054222867.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15978153 (View on PubMed)

Karunakar MA, Shah SN, Jerabek S. Body mass index as a predictor of complications after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1498-502. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02258.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15995116 (View on PubMed)

Rubin RH. Surgical wound infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 27;6:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-171.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17129369 (View on PubMed)

Wilson JA, Clark JJ. Obesity: impediment to postsurgical wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2004 Oct;17(8):426-35. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200410000-00013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15492679 (View on PubMed)

Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ, Marks MW, DeFranzo AJ, Molnar JA, David LR. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of clinic art. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7 Suppl):127S-142S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000222551.10793.51.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16799380 (View on PubMed)

Morykwas MJ, Simpson J, Punger K, Argenta A, Kremers L, Argenta J. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7 Suppl):121S-126S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000225450.12593.12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16799379 (View on PubMed)

Venturi ML, Attinger CE, Mesbahi AN, Hess CL, Graw KS. Mechanisms and clinical applications of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) Device: a review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(3):185-94. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200506030-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15943495 (View on PubMed)

Gomoll AH, Lin A, Harris MB. Incisional vacuum-assisted closure therapy. J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(10):705-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000211159.98239.d2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17106382 (View on PubMed)

Porter SE, Russell GV, Dews RC, Qin Z, Woodall J Jr, Graves ML. Complications of acetabular fracture surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Oct;22(9):589-94. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318188d6c3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18827587 (View on PubMed)

Porter SE, Graves ML, Qin Z, Russell GV. Operative experience of pelvic fractures in the obese. Obes Surg. 2008 Jun;18(6):702-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9320-y. Epub 2008 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18373124 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-0142

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.