Infrared Pupillometry During General Anesthesia to Predict Pain

NCT ID: NCT02058511

Last Updated: 2019-02-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study comprises of a series of pupillary measurements using infrared pupillometry in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery of any type.

Infrared pupillometry will be used to assess whether a painful stimulus results in pupillary reflex dilation (PRD). The extend of the PRD may be an indicator how painful a stimulus is. This may help to predict the amount of discomfort a patient will be experiencing after emergence from general anesthesia.

In addition to measuring the pupillary reflex dilation, we will also measure oscillations of pupil size before and after indiction of anesthesia, as well as during recovery. These spontaneously occuring oscillations in pupil size, also called hippus, appear to be sensitive to anesthetics and opioids. However, the effect of these drugs on hippus has not been systematically addressed.

The aim of the study is

1. to identify whether regional anesthesia techniques such as femoral and sciatic nerve blocks will block the PRD. This would allow assessment of block success in the anesthetized patient.
2. to correlate the extent of the pupillary reflex dilation and hippus in the anesthetized patient during and at the end of surgery with early postoperative pain scores and subsequent analgesia requirements. Such correlation would allow to predict the amount of postoperative pain before the patients emerge from general anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The planned study is a prospective cohort study.

Patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery of any type (debridements, repair of anterior (ACL) or posterior cruciform ligaments (PCL), meniscectomies, medial (MCL) or lateral collateral ligament (LCL) repair, as well as microfracture surgery will be enrolled.

During anesthesia, infrared pupillometry will be used to assess whether a painful stimulus results in pupillary reflex dilation (PRD). The extend of the PRD may be an indicator how painful a stimulus is. The PRD is measurable under general anesthesia in spite of the fact that the patient does not "feel" or experience the painful stimulus.

The aim of the study is

1. to identify whether regional anesthesia techniques such as femoral and sciatic nerve blocks (performed before the start of anesthesia) will block the PRD evoked by a painful stimulus such electrical stimulation before procedure start. This would allow assessment of block success in the anesthetized patient.
2. to correlate the extent of the pupillary reflex dilation and hippus in the anesthetized patient during and at the end of surgery with early postoperative pain scores and subsequent analgesia requirements. Such correlation would allow to predict the amount of postoperative pain before the patients emerge from general anesthesia.

Knee arthroscopies are routinely performed under general anesthesia with or without regional anesthesia, depending on the anticipated extent of surgery and the preferences of the anesthesiologist and surgeon. The assessment of the PRD and/or hipppus before emergence would identify those patients who would benefit from an additional nerve block before emergence to achieve better pain control immediately postoperatively and to reduce the demand for postoperative analgesics.

The planned investigation tries to achieve two novel findings. First, the measurement of the PRD at the start of surgery will demonstrate whether a nerve block successfully blocks the initial surgical stimulus. There is currently no method available that can assess block success in the anesthetized patient. Secondly, the measurement at the end of the surgery tries to predict the amount of pain following emergence from surgery. Pain may be experienced by patients without nerve blocks as well as with nerve blocks, as the latter may have failed or incomplete blocks, or may had a more extensive procedure that cannot be completely covered by the block administered preoperatively. Identifying these patients may allow treatment to minimize discomfort following emergence.

Pupillary reflex dilation describes the dilation of the pupil following a painful stimulus. The dilation last several seconds. Pupillometry using an infrared pupillometer allows the quantification of the reflex dilation. The PRD can be given a numerical value that reflects the extent of the dilation. A recently published study demonstrated the correlation of the extend of the PRD with pain scores and opioid requirements postoperatively. However, this study was done in awake patients following surgery. The aim of this study is to predict analgesia requirements in patients still under general anesthesia, before they experience postoperative pain. We expect that infrared pupillometry during general anesthesia can predict pain following surgery. Once this has been established, this knowledge and its application would allow the anesthesiologist to initiate pain-relieving interventions such as additional nerve blocks or administration of analgesics before emergence of the patients from general anesthesia.

In addition to measuring the pupillary reflex dilation, we will also measure oscillations of pupil size before and after induction of anesthesia, as well as during recovery. These spontaneously occurring oscillations in pupil size, also called hippus, appear to be sensitive to anesthetics and opioids. However, the effect of these drugs on hippus has not been systematically addressed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Objective Assessment of Sedation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group

all enrolled patients undergo the same protocol/ treatment:

Anesthesia Premedication, Induction and Maintenance Pupillometry after administration of anesthetic drugs

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anesthesia Premedication, Induction and Maintenance

Intervention Type DRUG

The enrolled patients receive standard of care general anesthesia for knee arthroscopy. No additional pharmacological interventions are performed in study participants.

The administered drugs, as outlined in the arms section, are midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and sevoflurane. Study patients receive analgesic drugs as needed in the recovery room if they experience pain.

Pupillometry after administration of anesthetic drugs

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All study patients receive the standard of anesthetic care. Every time a anesthetic drug has been administered, changes in pupillary oscillations will be recorded.

Assessment of pupil size and movements by shining infrared light into the eye and measuring the reflection over a 20 s period

The administered drugs are:

Midazolam 1-2 mg iv, Fentanyl 1mcg/kg body weight, Propofol for anesthesia induction 2-2.5 mg/kg body weight, Sevoflurane as needed for maintenance of general anesthesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anesthesia Premedication, Induction and Maintenance

The enrolled patients receive standard of care general anesthesia for knee arthroscopy. No additional pharmacological interventions are performed in study participants.

The administered drugs, as outlined in the arms section, are midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and sevoflurane. Study patients receive analgesic drugs as needed in the recovery room if they experience pain.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pupillometry after administration of anesthetic drugs

All study patients receive the standard of anesthetic care. Every time a anesthetic drug has been administered, changes in pupillary oscillations will be recorded.

Assessment of pupil size and movements by shining infrared light into the eye and measuring the reflection over a 20 s period

The administered drugs are:

Midazolam 1-2 mg iv, Fentanyl 1mcg/kg body weight, Propofol for anesthesia induction 2-2.5 mg/kg body weight, Sevoflurane as needed for maintenance of general anesthesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 18 years undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery of any type

Exclusion Criteria

* Blindness
* Anisocoria
* History of opioid abuse
* Chronic pain patients
* Gastric Reflux Disease (due to the use of laryngeal masks in the study)
* Non english speaking patients
* Cognitive impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Matthias Behrends

Associate Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orthopedic Institute

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pupillometry and Analgesia

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Vitreous Chemistry Analysis
NCT02051517 COMPLETED