Real-life Security and Efficacy of DAA-based Therapy in HCV/HIV-Coinfected Patients

NCT ID: NCT02057003

Last Updated: 2016-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of DAA-based regimens in the clinical practice in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Hypothesis: The efficacy and tolerability of DAA-based regimens in the clinical practice is different to what is observed in clinical trials in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment strategies aimed to achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) are of highest priority in patients with chronic hepatitis C and HIV coinfection, since SVR leads to a dramatic reduction in the incidence of hepatic decompensations and mortality in this setting. Until recently, therapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) was based on pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV). This combination prompt SVR only in approximately 50% of the HCV genotype 1 (HCV-1)-infected patients. Furthermore, it is costly and associated with multiple and sometimes serious side effects. In the setting of HIV/HCV-1-coinfection, rates of SVR are even lower and do not exceed 25% in the clinical practice.

Considerable increases of SVR have been achieved recently with the arrival of direct acting antivirals (DAA) against HCV. Among the first of these new agents are the protease inhibitors telaprevir (TVR) and boceprevir (BOC), which are approved for HCV-1 infection. Data obtained from clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of peg-IFN/RBV with TVR or BOC significantly augments SVR rates as compared to what is observed with peg-IFN plus RBV only. As a consequence, triple therapy including peg-IFN, RBV plus TVR or BOC has become the standard therapy for HCV-1-infected patients in our setting. In addition, a number of further DAAs are currently in the final phases of development, as it is the case for the protease inhibitors faldaprevir and simeprevir, the polymerase NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir and the NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir.

Although the considerable improvement of therapy outcome with DAA-including regimens is giving a positive prospective, there are a number of questions that have to be solved as soon as possible. On the one hand, the information on response to DAA in the coinfected population is derived from clinical trials, which often do not reflect patient management in the clinical practice. Also, the populations included in clinical trials are highly selective and may lack the high proportion of difficult-to-treat individuals expected among the candidate population, i.e., those who failed previous treatment and who bear compensated cirrhosis. In fact, data derived from the French cohort CUPIC including HCV-monoinfected, cirrhotic patients, show that tolerability and efficacy of TVR and BOC-based treatment is lower than observed in pivotal trials. On the other hand, similar to dual therapy including Peg-IFN/RBV, it is possible that both response rates and safety profiles of DAAs are not comparable between HCV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. In this context, the coinfected population has singularities as the coadministration of antiretroviral therapy, that may cause drug-drug-interactions and decreased tolerability, thus resulting in diminished efficacy. Finally, it is of highest relevance to identify predictive factors for treatment response in the new DAA-based regimens in order to individualize treatment decision and duration of therapy.

Due to the above mentioned, studies on safety and efficacy of DAA-based therapy under real life conditions in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients are urgently needed.

Primary objectives:

* To determine the efficacy of DAA-based therapy in the clinical in patients with chronic hepatitis C and HIV coinfection.
* To determine the security of DAA-based therapy in the clinical in patients with chronic hepatitis C and HIV coinfection.

Secondary objectives:

* Identification of predictive factors for response to DAA-based treatment in the studied population.
* Compare security and efficacy of the different DAAs used.
* Evaluate the on-treatment HCV kinetics for the different regimens.

Scheduled visits: 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks, as well as 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment.

Definition SVR: Undetectable HCV-RNA 24 weeks after scheduled end of treatment.

Definition of hepatic fibrosis:

* advanced fibrosis: F3 as determined by liver biopsy or 11 kilopascals as determined by transient elastometry
* cirrhosis: F4 as determined by liver biopsy or 14.6 kilopascals as determined by transient elastometry

Variables collected within in the cohort:

* primary outcome variable: SVR (efficacy study) and % of patients who discontinued therapy due to adverse events (safety study)
* epidemiological variable: age, sex, interleukin 28B rs12979860 genotype
* variables related to hepatitis C virus-infection: infection route, genotype, grade of hepatic fibrosis and method used for its determination, baseline Child-Pough-Index, previous hepatic decompensations
* treatment-related variables: previous response to treatment, doses and dose reductions/discontinuations of peg-IFN, RBV and the DAA(s), overall severe adverse events, adverse events that occur in more than 5% of the patients, hepatic decompensations, deaths, HCV viral load at baseline and at each visit
* variables related to HIV-infection: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) category, HIV viral load, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell count, antiretroviral regimen
* analytical variables: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), platelets, leucocytes, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, bilirubin, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase,
* clinical variables: alcohol intake Quality assurance and data checks: Data will be obtained from controlled databases at the participating centers. Databases will be monitored and controlled by queries every three months. Descriptive statistics will be be applied in order to detect transcription errors.

Source data verification: not planned.

All grade 3 or 4 adverse events, as well as all unexpected events, will be reported to the Andalusian Center for Pharmacovigilance (Centro Andaluz de Farmacovigilancia, www.cafv.es).

A sample size of 230 is planned for this study.

Statistical analysis: The outcome variables of this study will be the achievement of SVR, as well as the development of severe adverse events during follow-up. Descriptive statistical analysis will be performed in order to describe the cohort. Continuous variables will be expressed as median \[interquartile range (IQR)\] and categorical variables as number \[percentage; 95% confidence interval (CI)\]. The association of continuous variables with SVR or the frequency of patients who discontinue therapy will be analyzed using the Student's t-test for normal distribution and the Mann-Whitney U-test otherwise whereas the relationship with categorical variables will be determined applying the χ2-test or the Fisher's test, when applicable. Those factors that show an association in the univariate analysis with a p\<0.2, as well as those with a biologically possible influence, will be entered logistic regression in order to identify independent predictors for SVR. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and the respective 95% CI will be calculated. All p values \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Data will be analyzed using the SPSS statistical software package release 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) and STATA 9.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).

Sample size calculations: Estimating a SVR rate of 55%, with a confidence interval of 95% and a lost-to-follow-up rate of 5%, a minimum of 230 patients should be included in order to obtain a precision of 5%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C, Chronic Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DAA-based therapy against HCV

HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who start therapy against HCV including one or more DAA

DAA against HCV

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DAA against HCV

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

telaprevir boceprevir simeprevir sofosbuvir daclatasvir ombitasvir paritaprevir dasabuvir ledipasvir grazoprevir elbasvir velpatasvir

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older than 18 years
* HIV infection determined by enzymeimmunoassay and confirmed by Western Blot
* Naïve to treatment including a DAA
* Initiation of triple therapy including a DAA
* Written informed consent to participate in the study and to undergo genetic determinations

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Any contraindication for the administration of peg-IFN, RBV or the respective DAA
* Patients who are not able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Regional de Malaga

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Torrecárdenas

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Huelva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital La Línea

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario Puerto Real

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario de Canarias

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Poniente

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Valme University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

José A. Mira Escarti

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karin Neukam, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Valme University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Valme University Hospital

Seville, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Karin Neukam, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0034955015799

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Karin Neukam, PhD

Role: primary

0034955015799

Juan A Pineda, MD

Role: backup

0034955015684

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Coverdale SA, Khan MH, Byth K, Lin R, Weltman M, George J, Samarasinghe D, Liddle C, Kench JG, Crewe E, Farrell GC. Effects of interferon treatment response on liver complications of chronic hepatitis C: 9-year follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Apr;99(4):636-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04085.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15089895 (View on PubMed)

Berenguer J, Alvarez-Pellicer J, Martin PM, Lopez-Aldeguer J, Von-Wichmann MA, Quereda C, Mallolas J, Sanz J, Tural C, Bellon JM, Gonzalez-Garcia J; GESIDA3603/5607 Study Group. Sustained virological response to interferon plus ribavirin reduces liver-related complications and mortality in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2009 Aug;50(2):407-13. doi: 10.1002/hep.23020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19575364 (View on PubMed)

Mira JA, Rivero A, de Los Santos-Gil I, Lopez-Cortes LF, Giron-Gonzalez JA, Marquez M, Merino D, del Mar Viloria M, Tellez F, Rios-Villegas MJ, Omar M, Rivero-Juarez A, Macias J, Pineda JA; Grupo HEPAVIR de la Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SAEI). Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 responds better to pegylated interferon with ribavirin than genotype 1 in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2012 Aug 24;26(13):1721-4. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283568884.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22695304 (View on PubMed)

Jacobson IM, McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Di Bisceglie AM, Reddy KR, Bzowej NH, Marcellin P, Muir AJ, Ferenci P, Flisiak R, George J, Rizzetto M, Shouval D, Sola R, Terg RA, Yoshida EM, Adda N, Bengtsson L, Sankoh AJ, Kieffer TL, George S, Kauffman RS, Zeuzem S; ADVANCE Study Team. Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 23;364(25):2405-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012912.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21696307 (View on PubMed)

Poordad F, McCone J Jr, Bacon BR, Bruno S, Manns MP, Sulkowski MS, Jacobson IM, Reddy KR, Goodman ZD, Boparai N, DiNubile MJ, Sniukiene V, Brass CA, Albrecht JK, Bronowicki JP; SPRINT-2 Investigators. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 31;364(13):1195-206. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010494.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21449783 (View on PubMed)

Hezode C, Fontaine H, Dorival C, Larrey D, Zoulim F, Canva V, de Ledinghen V, Poynard T, Samuel D, Bourliere M, Zarski JP, Raabe JJ, Alric L, Marcellin P, Riachi G, Bernard PH, Loustaud-Ratti V, Metivier S, Tran A, Serfaty L, Abergel A, Causse X, Di Martino V, Guyader D, Lucidarme D, Grando-Lemaire V, Hillon P, Feray C, Dao T, Cacoub P, Rosa I, Attali P, Petrov-Sanchez V, Barthe Y, Pawlotsky JM, Pol S, Carrat F, Bronowicki JP; CUPIC Study Group. Triple therapy in treatment-experienced patients with HCV-cirrhosis in a multicentre cohort of the French Early Access Programme (ANRS CO20-CUPIC) - NCT01514890. J Hepatol. 2013 Sep;59(3):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23669289 (View on PubMed)

Gonzalez-Serna A, Corma-Gomez A, Tellez F, Corona-Mata D, Rios-Villegas MJ, Merino D, Galera C, Collado-Romacho AR, De Los Santos I, Cucurull J, Santos M, Garcia-Martin S, Rivero A, Real LM, Macias J. Response to glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in clinical practice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Oct 3;78(10):2591-2596. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad278.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37671831 (View on PubMed)

Macias J, Morano LE, Tellez F, Granados R, Rivero-Juarez A, Palacios R, Rios M, Merino D, Perez-Perez M, Collado A, Figueruela B, Morano A, Freyre-Carrillo C, Martin JM, Rivero A, Garcia F, Pineda JA; HEPAVIR group from the Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SAEI) and the GEHEP group from the Sociedad Espanola de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia (SEIMC). Response to direct-acting antiviral therapy among ongoing drug users and people receiving opioid substitution therapy. J Hepatol. 2019 Jul;71(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30853642 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HEPAVIR-DAA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.