Paracetamol vs Ibuprofen for PDA Closure in Preterm Infants.

NCT ID: NCT02056223

Last Updated: 2019-11-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-09

Study Completion Date

2019-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current pharmacological options to treat an hemodynamically significant PDA (HsPDA) in preterm infants are limited to non-selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors, indomethacin or ibuprofen. Recently paracetamol exposure has been reported to successful closure of PDA. Aim of this randomized double-blind controlled study is to compare the efficacy and the safety of standard PDA treatment ibuprofen versus paracetamol-experimental treatment . We hypothesize that paracetamol is more effective than ibuprofen in closing PDA, perhaps ameliorating the safety profile of the pharmacological treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 therapeutic regimens for PDA treatment in a population of preterm newborns of gestational age (GA) \<31+6 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and HsPDA:

* Group A: experimental boluses of paracetamol at 15 mg/Kg four time a day for three consecutive days.
* Group B: standard boluses of ibuprofen at 10-5-5-mg/Kg/dose once a day for three consecutive days.

The primary objective of the study is: to evaluate the efficacy of paracetamol versus standard ibuprofen regimen, by comparing the rate of ductal closure after the first and second course of pharmacological treatment. (PDA diagnosed by ECHO criteria)

The secondary objective of the study is: to evaluate the safety of the above 2 therapeutic regimens in term of incidence of transient renal impairment, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or other bleeding disorders, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and isolated bowel perforation (without signs of NEC), incidence of sign of liver toxicity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ductus Arteriosus Patent Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

paracetamol

Boluses of intravenous paracetamol at 15 mg/Kg four time a day for three consecutive days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intravenous paracetamol

Intervention Type DRUG

15 mg/Kg every 6 hours for three days

Intravenous ibuprofen

Standard boluses of ibuprofen at 10-5-5-mg/Kg/dose once a day for three consecutive days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intravenous ibuprofen

Intervention Type DRUG

10 -5-5 mg/Kg once a day for three days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intravenous paracetamol

15 mg/Kg every 6 hours for three days

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous ibuprofen

10 -5-5 mg/Kg once a day for three days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Paracetamol i.v. Pedea i.v.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* inborn neonates
* preterm neonates ≤ 31+ 6 days weeks gestation
* newborns with HsPDA
* parental written informed consent for participation in the study must be obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Serum creatinine concentration greater than 1,5 mg/dl (132MMole/L)
* Urine output less than 1 ml/Kg/h
* Severe IVH (\> grade II according to Volpe classification)
* Clinical bleeding tendency (as revealed by hematuria, blood in the gastric aspirate or in the stools, blood in the endotracheal tube aspirate)
* Necrotizing enterocolitis or marked abdominal distention with gastric bile residuals
* Thrombocyte count of less than 50.000/mm3
* Proved Sepsis
* Severe coagulopathy or liver failure
* Evidence of severe birth asphyxia, that is an APGAR score below 5 at 5 minutes of age and/or umbilical arterial pH \< 7.0
* Known genetic or chromosomal disorders
* Participation in another clinical trial of any placebo, drug, biological, or device conducted under the provisions of a protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

36 Hours

Maximum Eligible Age

72 Hours

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Padova

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paola Lago

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paola Lago, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Women's and Children's Health Department- AO- University of Padua

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NICU, Women's and Children's Health Department, Azienda Ospedaliera-University of Padua

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oncel MY, Yurttutan S, Degirmencioglu H, Uras N, Altug N, Erdeve O, Dilmen U. Intravenous paracetamol treatment in the management of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants. Neonatology. 2013;103(3):166-9. doi: 10.1159/000345337. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23258386 (View on PubMed)

Hammerman C, Bin-Nun A, Markovitch E, Schimmel MS, Kaplan M, Fink D. Ductal closure with paracetamol: a surprising new approach to patent ductus arteriosus treatment. Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):e1618-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0359. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22065264 (View on PubMed)

Oncel MY, Yurttutan S, Uras N, Altug N, Ozdemir R, Ekmen S, Erdeve O, Dilmen U. An alternative drug (paracetamol) in the management of patent ductus arteriosus in ibuprofen-resistant or contraindicated preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Jan;98(1):F94. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302044. Epub 2012 May 18. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22611117 (View on PubMed)

Allegaert K, Palmer GM, Anderson BJ. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous paracetamol in neonates: size matters most. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jun;96(6):575-80. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.204552. Epub 2011 Feb 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21317433 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-004955-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PARIDA 01/2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.