A Study of Vinflunine Plus Gemcitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02054338
Last Updated: 2019-08-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
1004 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-06-30
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Gemcitabine/Vinorelbine Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine/Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00480597
Vinorelbine/Gemcitabine Versus Vinorelbine/Cisplatin in Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT02544243
Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Metastatic Cancer
NCT00274859
Polyglutamate Paclitaxel Compared With Gemcitabine or Vinorelbine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00054197
Phase II Study of Gemcitabine/Vinorelbine vs Sequential Gemcitabine Followed by Vinorelbine in Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00532623
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with metastatic breast cancer are incurable using conventional therapy with antitumoural hormonal drugs or cytostatic agents. The median survival from diagnosis of metastatic disease to death is reported to be approximately 3 years. While newer chemotherapeutic agents have been able to achieve tumour shrinkage, no significant increases in overall survival have been demonstrated so far. One reason for this result may be that breast cancer has a longer disease time span than NSCLC, allowing for administration of multiple therapies with different modalities. These therapies confound overall survival regardless of whether the treatment is a first-line or a subsequent treatment. The combination of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel has demonstrated improvement in overall survival over paclitaxel alone as first line therapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, however, this study compared single agent versus combination chemotherapy.
Using overall survival as a primary endpoint in a trial Using overall survival as a primary endpoint in a trial comparing 2 different cytostatic combinations in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer requires a large phase III study to detect a clinically significant difference. The advantages with such an endpoint are that it is technically easy to monitor and it is not dependent on monitoring tumour status. However, since patients with breast cancer typically receive 3 or more lines of chemotherapy, it becomes difficult to assess the impact of a first-line therapy on overall survival (as proposed herein) due to the potential for confounding effects from later treatments. A more specific instrument -if closely monitored- is progression-free survival. This endpoint reflects the impact of a specific treatment modality on the disease at a given time period and is probably confounded neither by prior treatments nor by subsequent therapies. Progression-free survival also represents an important clinical achievement for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
vinflunine plus gemcitabine
vinflunine 320 mg/m² D1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 D1 and D8 every 3 weeks
Vinflunine+Gemcitabine
Vinflunine 320 mg/m² IV on day 1 and.Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of each cycle repeated every 3 weeks
paclitaxel plus gemcitabine
paclitaxel 175 mg/m² D1 followed by Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² D1 and D8 every 3 weeks
Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine
paclitaxel 175 mg/m² on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² on days 1
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vinflunine+Gemcitabine
Vinflunine 320 mg/m² IV on day 1 and.Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of each cycle repeated every 3 weeks
Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine
paclitaxel 175 mg/m² on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² on days 1
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years or older but less than 75 years old
* histologically/cytologically confirmed breast cancer
* documented locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
* HER-2 negative or unknown
* prior neo- and/or adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy
* measurable or non-measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0
* adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions
* ECG without any clinically relevant abnormality
Exclusion Criteria
* history of second primary malignancy
* patients having as sole tumour lesion: malignant effusion, lymphangitis, cystic lesion, bone lesion, and any other lesion not assessed by imaging techniques or colour photography
* pre-existing motor/sensory grade \> 1 peripheral neuropathy
* prior therapy with vinca alkaloids and/or gemcitabine
* history of severe hypersensitivity to vinca alkaloids and/or gemcitabine or contraindication to any of these drugs
* pregnancy or breast feeding
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pierre Fabre Medicament
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karim Keddad, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Employed Pierre Fabre Medicament
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2006-001139-23
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
L00070 IN 303 B0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.