FINGER Robot Therapy Study

NCT ID: NCT02048826

Last Updated: 2021-03-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of training hand movement using FINGER robot after stroke. FINGER is a robot that measures finger movements and allows users to play computer games using those movements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Robotic devices can be used to retrain movement after stroke. However, it is unclear how best to assist in movement. Providing physical assistance may improve the flow of proprioceptive information to the nervous system, which may help a person relearn to move a limb. On the other hand, assisting movement with a robot may cause a person to "slack", not trying as hard during therapy. This study will test the effect of different levels of assistance on recovery of finger function during robot-assisted therapy after stroke.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebrovascular Accident

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FINGER I

Subjects participate in 3 weeks of exercising with the experimental device: FINGER robot with first setting at a minimum of 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with the exercise program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FINGER I

Intervention Type DEVICE

FINGER is a robot that measures finger movements and allows patients to play computer game using those movements. Patients will be exercising with FINGER using setting I

FINGER II

Intervention Type DEVICE

FINGER is a robot that measures finger movements and allows patients to play computer game using those movements. Patients will be exercising with FINGER using setting II

FINGER II

Subjects participate in 3 weeks of exercising with the experimental device: FINGER robot with a second setting at a minimum of 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with the exercise program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FINGER I

Intervention Type DEVICE

FINGER is a robot that measures finger movements and allows patients to play computer game using those movements. Patients will be exercising with FINGER using setting I

FINGER II

Intervention Type DEVICE

FINGER is a robot that measures finger movements and allows patients to play computer game using those movements. Patients will be exercising with FINGER using setting II

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FINGER I

FINGER is a robot that measures finger movements and allows patients to play computer game using those movements. Patients will be exercising with FINGER using setting I

Intervention Type DEVICE

FINGER II

FINGER is a robot that measures finger movements and allows patients to play computer game using those movements. Patients will be exercising with FINGER using setting II

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 to 80 years of age
* Have history of stroke affecting the arm, at least 6 months prior to enrollment
* have arm and/or hand weakness as measured on a standard clinical scale
* do not have active major psychological problems, or problems affecting the stroke-affected arm or hand besides the stroke
* do not have active major brain disease other than the stroke
* have absence of pain in the stroke-affected arm and hand

Exclusion Criteria

* severe stiffness of the arm or hand as measured on a standard clinical scale
* severe problems speaking or understanding speech as measured on a standard clinical scale
* severe reduced level of consciousness
* severe loss ability to sense movement of your limbs as measured on a standard clinical scale
* currently pregnant
* difficulty in understanding or complying with the instructions given by the researcher
* inability to perform the experimental task that will be studied
* increased pain with movement of the stroke-affected arm or hand


* Subjects having any implanted metal such as metallic splinters, metallic surgical clips, prosthetic heart valves, pacemakers, neuro-stimulation devices, orthodontic work that contains ferromagnetic materials,
* Subjects whose occupation or activities may cause accidental lodging of ferromagnetic materials, or that may have imbedded metal fragments from military activities, unless cleared by a screening head CT scan
* Subjects with tattoo(s) presenting metallic or ferromagnetic color ingredients or with facial make-up
* Subjects who have claustrophobia
* Subjects who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Irvine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Reinkensmeyer

Professor of Anatomy and Neurobiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Reinkensmeyer, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Irvine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Irvine

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ingemanson ML, Rowe JR, Chan V, Wolbrecht ET, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC. Somatosensory system integrity explains differences in treatment response after stroke. Neurology. 2019 Mar 5;92(10):e1098-e1108. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007041. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30728310 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HS#2008-6432

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Finger Movement Training After Stroke
NCT05621980 RECRUITING NA
Reaching in Stroke
NCT02654951 COMPLETED NA
Rehabilitation of the Stroke Hand at Home
NCT01144715 COMPLETED PHASE4
Kinesio Taping in Stroke Patient
NCT06188845 COMPLETED NA