Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for BMI 27-32 Type 2 Diabetes Versus Best Medical Treatment

NCT ID: NCT02041234

Last Updated: 2022-06-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Investigators aim to show that Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is superior to best medical treatment in reaching well-defined treatment end points in Asian subjects of BMI 27-32 with type 2 Diabetes (DM2). Investigators also hope to show that successful RYGB will reduce resource utilization in the near term with similar projected reduction over the medium to long term.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

40 subjects with DM2 will be recruited, randomised into two arms. The surgical arm will be subjected to RYGB. The medical arm will be treated maximally utilising the best means available and following internationally available protocol/guidelines. The study population will be subjected to a set of tests which is over and above the standard tests for similar groups of patients undergoing standard care (details below). Some test samples will be bio-banked. Treatment end points and follow up protocol will be the same for each treatment arm. The International Diabetic Federation (IDF) in 2011 recommended that bariatric surgery should be considered an alternative treatment option for those Asian DM2 subjects with BMI of 27 or above. Data for the effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery for those DM subjects with lower BMI is not as well established as those with higher BMI. There is scant good quality data, especially from Asian subjects. As their treatment is totally funded by the research project, subjects on the non surgical treatment arm will benefit from the more intense management of their disease with no restriction due to cost. The surgical arm will also be fully funded by the research project. They will be exposed to the standard risks associated with this type of surgery. Subjects in both arms will have to provide more blood and other samples than usual and has to follow visits protocol as close as possible. RYGB is a major surgical procedure, with significant potential complications; during the process of surgery and afterwards, both short and long term. Procedure related mortality is about 0.3%. Major complications that may require surgical intervention includes: anastomotic leakage about 3-4%, bleeding 3%, infection 3%, venous thrombo-embolism 1%. Some of these complications will require prolong hospitalisation. After surgery, loose stool, dumping syndrome, anastomotic ulcers can occur in less than 3%.Life long dietary supplement will be required. Longer term post surgical complications include intestinal obstruction due to adhesions or internal hernia, about 2%, further surgery may be needed. This risk is lifelong. Nutritional deficiencies, especially if not compliant with regular supplement intake, may occur. Drug allergies can occur; from simple rash to life threatening anaphylactic reaction. Blood taking can cause bruising, pain at the puncture site and sometimes fainting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type II Diabetes in Subjects BMI 27 to 32

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as per standard surgical protocol, with a 30 cc gastric pouch, 50 cm biliopancreatic limb and 100cm gastrointestinal limb.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as per standard surgical protocol, with a 30 cc gastric pouch, 50 cm biliopancreatic limb and 100cm gastrointestinal limb.

Best Medical Treatment

Anti-diabetic medications provided (Mono- or Combination- therapy):

Incretin analogues: Liraglutide up to 3 mg daily Or DPP-4 Inhibitors: Sitagliptin up to 100 mg daily, Linagliptin up to 5mg daily Xenical: Up to 120 mg tds SGLT2 inhibitors: Empagliflozin up to 25mg daily, Canagliflozin up to 300mg daily Participants will also take lipids \& BP medications according to standard of care.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Incretin analogues

Intervention Type DRUG

Incretin analogues: Liraglutide up to 1.8 mg daily

Xenical

Intervention Type DRUG

Xenical: Up to 120 mg tds

SGLT2 inhibitors

Intervention Type DRUG

SGLT2 inhibitors: Empagliflozin up to 25mg daily, Canagliflozin up to 300mg daily

DPP-4 Inhibitors

Intervention Type DRUG

Sitagliptin up to 100 mg daily, Linagliptin up to 5mg daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as per standard surgical protocol, with a 30 cc gastric pouch, 50 cm biliopancreatic limb and 100cm gastrointestinal limb.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Incretin analogues

Incretin analogues: Liraglutide up to 1.8 mg daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Xenical

Xenical: Up to 120 mg tds

Intervention Type DRUG

SGLT2 inhibitors

SGLT2 inhibitors: Empagliflozin up to 25mg daily, Canagliflozin up to 300mg daily

Intervention Type DRUG

DPP-4 Inhibitors

Sitagliptin up to 100 mg daily, Linagliptin up to 5mg daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Liraglutide Orlistat Empagliflozin Canagliflozin Sitagliptin Linagliptin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Established diagnosis of DM2 = or \< 10 years
2. Age 21-65
3. BMI 27-32.
4. HBA1c ≥ 8%, on maximum treatment from primary care physician
5. At least one of the following co-morbidities on treatment: hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, micro/macro-proteinuria or ≤class I nephropathy, retinopathy.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects who had previous Bariatric surgery or extensive upper abdominal surgery
2. Pregnant subjects.
3. Nephropathy requiring dialysis
4. Subjects who are not fit for general anaesthesia.
5. Subjects who are unsuitable for RYGB for whatever reason, medical/surgical/psychological.
6. Subjects who are unwilling or possibly unable to participate in the follow up process.
7. Subjects who are reluctant to be randomised into the two study groups.
8. Subjects who suffers from unstable psychiatric illness
9. Subjects who are active substance abusers
10. Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody positive.
11. fasting C-peptide \< 300 pmol/L
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Khoo Teck Puat Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anton Cheng

Dr Anton Cheng

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anton Cheng, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Khoo Teck Puat Hospital

Su Chi Lim, MBBS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Khoo Teck Puat Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Khoo Teck Puat Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Colquitt JL, Picot J, Loveman E, Clegg AJ. Surgery for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19370590 (View on PubMed)

Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, Bantle JP, Sledge I. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009 Mar;122(3):248-256.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19272486 (View on PubMed)

Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren S, Gummesson A, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lonroth H, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM; Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):741-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066254.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17715408 (View on PubMed)

Dixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Rubino F; International Diabetes Federation Taskforce on Epidemiology and Prevention. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011 Jun;28(6):628-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03306.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21480973 (View on PubMed)

Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, Long SB, Morris PG, Brown BM, Barakat HA, deRamon RA, Israel G, Dolezal JM, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995 Sep;222(3):339-50; discussion 350-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7677463 (View on PubMed)

Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE, Thomas S, Abood B, Nissen SE, Bhatt DL. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1567-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200225. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22449319 (View on PubMed)

Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Leccesi L, Nanni G, Pomp A, Castagneto M, Ghirlanda G, Rubino F. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1577-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200111. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22449317 (View on PubMed)

Cohen RV, Pinheiro JC, Schiavon CA, Salles JE, Wajchenberg BL, Cummings DE. Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and only mild obesity. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jul;35(7):1420-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2289.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22723580 (View on PubMed)

Cheng A, Yeoh E, Moh A, Low S, Tan CH, Lam B, Sum CF, Subramaniam T, Lim SC. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus best medical treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults with body mass index between 27 and 32 kg/m2: A 5-year randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jun;188:109900. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109900. Epub 2022 May 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35513159 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Bariatric Surgery RCT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Different Limb Lengths in Gastric Bypass Surgery
NCT04219787 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA