Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians to Improve Admission Medication History Accuracy
NCT ID: NCT02026453
Last Updated: 2018-02-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
306 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The overarching hypothesis was that by leveraging pharmacists and pharmacy technicians we can minimize admission medication history errors and related downstream events.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Pharmacy Care in Older Veteran Outpatients
NCT00122122
Pharmaceutical Care and Clinical Outcomes for the Elderly Taking Potentially Inappropriate Medication
NCT00844025
Iatrogenic Drug Risk in People Over 75, With or Without Cognitive Disorders, From an Inventory of Their Family Pharmacy
NCT03686943
Medication Histories Conducted by Nurses (RNs), Pharmacy Techs (CPhTs) & Pharmacists (RPhs)
NCT01065675
Enhancing Timely Access to Medication Changes: The Role of Pharmacists in Overcoming Transitions of Care Challenges
NCT07018232
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To quantify AMH error reduction achieved when pharmacy staff obtain AMHs before admission medication orders (AMO) are placed.
Design: Three-arm randomized clinical trial. Setting: Large hospital with community and trainee physicians. Population: 306 enrolled patients with complex medical histories. Interventions: In one intervention arm, pharmacists, and in the second intervention arm, pharmacy technicians obtained initial AMHs prior to admission. They obtained and reconciled medication information from multiple sources. All arms, including the control arm, received usual AMH care. This included common process variation occurring in: accuracy of pre-existing medication histories; nurses' ability to obtain AMHs at hospital admission; and admitting physicians' efforts to verify and order from prior AMHs.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was severity-weighted mean AMH error score. To detect AMH errors, all patients received reference standard AMHs, which were compared with intervention and control group AMHs. AMH errors and resultant AMO errors were independently identified and rated by ≥2 investigators as significant, serious or life-threatening. Each error was assigned 1, 4 or 9 points, respectively, to calculate severity-weighted AMH and AMO error scores for each patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care
Physicians and nurses obtain admission medication history.
No interventions assigned to this group
Pharmacist obtains home med hx
Pharmacist obtains admission medication history, although usual care practices may also continue.
Pharmacist obtains admission medication history
Pharm tech obtains home med hx
Pharmacy technician obtains admission medication history, although usual care practices may also continue.
Pharmacy technician obtains admission medication history
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pharmacist obtains admission medication history
Pharmacy technician obtains admission medication history
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* History of acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure
* Admission from skilled nursing facility
* History of transplant, or active anticoagulant, insulin, or narrow therapeutic index medications.
* Admitted to pediatric, trauma or transplant services with pharmacists
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Josh Pevnick
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joshua M Pevnick, MD, MSHS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cedars-Sinai Health System
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pevnick JM, Palmer KA, Shane R, Wu CN, Bell DS, Diaz F, Cook-Wiens G, Jackevicius CA. Potential benefit of electronic pharmacy claims data to prevent medication history errors and resultant inpatient order errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):942-50. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv171. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
Nguyen CB, Shane R, Bell DS, Cook-Wiens G, Pevnick JM. A Time and Motion Study of Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Obtaining Admission Medication Histories. J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):180-183. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2702.
Pevnick JM, Nguyen C, Jackevicius CA, Palmer KA, Shane R, Cook-Wiens G, Rogatko A, Bear M, Rosen O, Seki D, Doyle B, Desai A, Bell DS. Improving admission medication reconciliation with pharmacists or pharmacy technicians in the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):512-520. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006761. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.