Efficacy and Safety Study of ME1111 in Patients With Onychomycosis

NCT ID: NCT02022215

Last Updated: 2024-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

304 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-12-19

Study Completion Date

2016-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of high and low strength of ME1111 solutions compared to the vehicle in the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Onychomycosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ME1111 Solution, Low strength

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ME1111 Solution, Low strength

Intervention Type DRUG

ME1111 Solution, Low strength, applied once daily for 48 weeks

ME1111 Solution, High strength

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ME1111 Solution, High strength

Intervention Type DRUG

ME1111 Solution, High strength, applied once daily for 48 weeks

Matching Vehicle Solution

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Matching Vehicle Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Vehicle Solution, applied once daily for 48 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ME1111 Solution, Low strength

ME1111 Solution, Low strength, applied once daily for 48 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

ME1111 Solution, High strength

ME1111 Solution, High strength, applied once daily for 48 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Vehicle Solution

Matching Vehicle Solution, applied once daily for 48 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mild to moderate distal lateral subungual onychomycosis
* A positive potassium hydroxide (KOH) microscopy
* A positive fungal culture for a dermatophyte
* Good general health

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncontrolled diabetes
* Onychomycosis of the fingernails
* Prior use of antifungal drugs (Failure to complete the specified washout period)
* History of HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C
* Diagnosis of psoriasis or history of psoriasis
* Participated in any other trial of an investigational drug or device within 30 days or participation in a research study concurrent with this study
* Pregnancy/lactation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Meiji Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miramar, Florida, United States

Site Status

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinton Township, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Fridley, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

College Station, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ME1111-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.