Achilles Tendon Rupture, Comparison Two Different Operative Techniques. Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. 14 Years Follow-up.
NCT ID: NCT02018224
Last Updated: 2014-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
55 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1998-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis; Augmentation with a down-turned gastrocnemius fascia flap does not provide better result than would end-to-end suture repair with use of the Krackow locking loop surgical technique in long-term follow up.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Achilles Tendon Rupture, Conservative vs. Operative Treatment: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02012803
Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Achilles Tendon Rupture
NCT00284648
Achilles Tendon Lengthening With Traditional vs. Accelerated Rehab
NCT04050748
Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendor Rupture
NCT03704532
Identification of Microcirculation After Surgical Treatment of Rupture of the Achilles Tendon
NCT01265004
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
End-to-end suturation without augmentation
End-to-end suturation without augmentation
End-to-end suturation without augmentation; Irregular tendon ends were cleaned and repaired by the Krackow technique with two separate 0-gauge absorbable sutures.
End-to-end suturation with augmentation
End-to-end suturation with augmentation.
End-to-end suturation with augmentation; End-to-end suturation as above with a 10 mm wide central gastrocnemius aponeurosis flap, as proposed by Silfverskjöld.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
End-to-end suturation without augmentation
End-to-end suturation without augmentation; Irregular tendon ends were cleaned and repaired by the Krackow technique with two separate 0-gauge absorbable sutures.
End-to-end suturation with augmentation.
End-to-end suturation with augmentation; End-to-end suturation as above with a 10 mm wide central gastrocnemius aponeurosis flap, as proposed by Silfverskjöld.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Oulu
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, , Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
evo-rad-akilles3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.