A Safety and Feasibility Study of Re-treating Patients With Severe Emphysema With the RePneu LVRC System.

NCT ID: NCT02012673

Last Updated: 2017-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Study design:

This study is a non randomized uncontrolled intervention.

Study population: Patients with severe emphysema who have previously been treated with the lung volume reduction coil system and significantly improved in lung function, exercise capacity or quality of life, 6 months after the treatment.

Intervention:

Patients will receive a lung volume reduction coil treatment by bronchoscopy.

Main study parameter:

The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.

Secondary study parameters:

Lung function

* Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
* Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
* Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Quality of life

* Change in the SGRQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
* Change in the CCQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Functional measures

* Change in the mMRC score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
* Change in the 6MWD, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD Emphysema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system. The RePneu LVRC is an implantable device, delivered through a fiber-optic bronchoscope, designed specifically to treat patients suffering from emphysema. The Coil is intended to compress the most damaged parenchyma and tension the surrounding tissue, which increases elastic recoil, reduces hyperinflation and redirects air to healthier portions of the lung for more effective ventilation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system. The RePneu LVRC is an implantable device, delivered through a fiber-optic bronchoscope, designed specifically to treat patients suffering from emphysema. The Coil is intended to compress the most damaged parenchyma and tension the surrounding tissue, which increases elastic recoil, reduces hyperinflation and redirects air to healthier portions of the lung for more effective ventilation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Treated with the RePneu LVRC system \> 24 months ago.
2. Six months after the first bilateral treatment with the RePneu LVRC system the patient had a significant improvement above the established minimal important difference (MID) of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD: 26 meter) or of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1: 100ml) or of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ: 4 points).
3. Subject has marked dyspnea scoring ≥2 on mMRC scale of 0-4.
4. Subject has stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study.
5. Subject read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form.
6. Subject has completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing.
7. Subject has received Influenza vaccinations consistent with local recommendations and/or policy.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject has co-morbidities that may significantly reduce subject's ability to improve exercise capacity (e.g., severe arthritis, planned knee surgery) or baseline limitation on 6MWT is not due to dyspnea.
2. Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by:

PaCO2 \>8.0 kPa; PaO2 \< 6.0 kPa (room air).
3. Subject has a history of recurrent clinically significant respiratory infections, defined as 3 hospitalizations for respiratory infection during the year prior to enrollment.
4. Subject has severe pulmonary hypertension defined by right ventricular systolic pressure \>50 mm Hg via echocardiogram.
5. Subject has an inability to walk \>140 meters in 6 minutes.
6. Subject has evidence of other severe disease (such as, but not limited to, lung cancer or renal failure), which in the judgment of the investigator may compromise survival of the subject for the duration of the study.
7. Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant within the study timeframe.
8. Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under moderate sedation or general anesthesia.
9. Subject has clinically significant bronchiectasis.
10. Subject has giant bullae \>1/3 lung volume.
11. Subject has had previous LVR surgery, lung transplantation or lobectomy.
12. Subject has been involved in pulmonary drug or device studies within 30 days prior to this study.
13. Subject is taking \>20 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily.
14. Subject requires high level chronic immunomodulatory therapy to treat a moderate to severe chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder.
15. Subject is on an antiplatelet (such as Plavix) or anticoagulant therapy (such as heparin or Coumadin) which cannot be stopped for 7 days prior to procedure.
16. Subject has a sensitivity or allergy to Nickel.
17. Subject has a known sensitivity to drugs required to perform bronchoscopy.
18. Subject has any other disease, condition(s) or habit(s) that would interfere with completion of study and follow up assessments, would increase risks of bronchoscopy or assessments, or in the judgment of the investigator would potentially interfere.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dirk-Jan Slebos

MD PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dirk-Jan Slebos, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Diseases

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECOIL-study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ex-Vivo Lung Reconditioning
NCT02906436 COMPLETED NA
AeriSeal System for Lung Volume Reduction
NCT01051258 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2