Aneurysma Hernia Study - Incidence of Incisional Hernias After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

NCT ID: NCT02012270

Last Updated: 2018-04-10

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 240 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2012-02-29
• Study Completion Date: 2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Principles= Prevention of incision hernias by primary closure of mid line laparotomies with the best-evidenced suture techniques.

Background:

Surgical practice of abdominal wall closure continues to rely largely on tradition rather than high-quality level I evidence. Incisional hernia after laparotomy for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has a high incidence.

At this moment the best results in a prospective randomised clinical trial considering incision hernia rates and wound infections, have been reported by the surgeons from the Sundsvall clinic in Sweden. Their technique using a suture to wound length ratio of at least 4/1 and using many small stitches will be described in the protocol as the "Principles Technique". We want to explore if these results can indeed prevent incision hernias significantly if implemented with training and tutoring.

Methodology:Vascular surgeons,who are not using the principles yet, but show an interest to learn the Principles, will be asked to monitor a cohort of AAA patients using their current sutures and surgical techniques. Some of the vascular surgeons will undergo training and if wanted, proctoring during the first procedures using the Principles. A cohort of 120 AAA patients will be closed according to the Principles and monitored. The results of these 120 patients will be compared to the control group consisting of patients closed with the conventional technique by non---trained surgeons. Primary endpoint:The incidence of incision hernias at 12 months will be determined by clinical examination.

Data management and ownership:

The data will be collected on a paper form and will be introduced is a database (SPSS Statistics, IBM) from which statistical analysis will be made.

Detailed Description

Principles= Prevention of incision hernias by primary closure of mid line laparotomies with the best-evidenced suture techniques.

Background:

Although many data from prospective studies have set some evidence-based principles to be adopted when closing mid line laparotomy incisions, these principles have not found a widespread implementation in the surgical community. Surgical practice continues to rely largely on tradition rather than high-quality level I evidence. Incision hernia after laparotomy for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has a high incidence of 10% to 37% depending on the method of follow up (clinically, with ultrasound or with CT scan) and the duration of follow up.

It is known that the surgical technique used to close the fascia in mid line laparotomies is an important parameter with regard to wound complications like wound infections and incision hernias. At this moment the best results in a prospective randomised clinical trial considering incisional hernia rates and wound infections, have been reported by the surgeons from the Sundsvall clinic in Sweden. Their technique using a suture to wound length ratio of at least 4/1 and using many small stitches will be described in the protocol as the "Principles Technique". We want to explore if these results can indeed prevent incision hernias significantly if implemented with training and tutoring.

Methodology:Vascular surgeons,who are not using the principles yet, but show an interest to learn the Principles, will be asked to monitor a cohort of AAA patients using their current sutures and surgical techniques. Some of the vascular surgeons will undergo training and if wanted, proctoring during the first procedures using the Principles. A cohort of 120 AAA patients will be closed according to the Principles and monitored. The results of these 120 patients will be compared to the control group consisting of patients closed with the conventional technique by non---trained surgeons. Study hypothesis and sample size calculation: Investigators might improve the incision hernia rate after AAA treatment through a mid line incision at 12 months by using the Principles from an estimated 25% in the conventionally closed patients to 10% in the patients closed using the Principles.

Calculation:

To show a decrease of 60% in the incision hernia rate at 12 months(25% vs 10% incision hernias at 12 months)with a power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, investigators need 100 evaluable patients at 12 months in each arm. To compensate a 20% lost to follow up, we have to include at least 120 patients before the "principles training" and 120 patients afterwards. So the trial will end inclusions when 120 AAA patients have been entered using the Principles. Most likely the control group will be larger than these 120 patients,depending on the number of vascular surgeons participating in the teaching course and the timing of this course.

Primary endpoint:The incidence of incision hernias at 12 months will be determined by clinical examination.

Data management and ownership:

The data will be collected on a paper form and will be introduced in a database (SPSS Statistics, IBM) from which statistical analysis will be made.

Conditions

Incisional Hernia; Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: CASE_CONTROL
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Conventional Group

Group of patients in whom after open AAA repair abdominal wall will be closed by conventional technique by the operating surgeons. There will be a great variation in sutures and techniques used

Conventional group

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

the fascia will be closed with the current method by the surgeons. There will be a great variation in sutures and techniques used. Study group: the fascia will be closed according

PRINCIPLES Group

Group of patients in whom after open AAA repair abdominal wall will be closed by PRINCIPLES technique by the operating surgeons.

PRINCIPLES technique

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Principles technique for closure of midline laparotomy incisions

• closure with a running suture of a slowly absorbable monofilament suture- Monomax 2/0 of 150 cm length with a taper needle point ((1/2 circle, size: 30mm) (B.Braun, reference 0041453)
• the suture is started and ended with a self-locking knot, if more than one suture is used sutures are knotted separately, only the fascia will be sutured with small stitches close to each other
• the SL/WL ratio should be at least 4/1
• SL/WL = (150cm x number of sutures used) - (the suture remnants)
• the mean stitch length should be less than 4 cm (suture length / number of stitches placed)

Interventions

PRINCIPLES technique

Principles technique for closure of midline laparotomy incisions

• closure with a running suture of a slowly absorbable monofilament suture- Monomax 2/0 of 150 cm length with a taper needle point ((1/2 circle, size: 30mm) (B.Braun, reference 0041453)
• the suture is started and ended with a self-locking knot, if more than one suture is used sutures are knotted separately, only the fascia will be sutured with small stitches close to each other
• the SL/WL ratio should be at least 4/1
• SL/WL = (150cm x number of sutures used) - (the suture remnants)
• the mean stitch length should be less than 4 cm (suture length / number of stitches placed)

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Conventional group

the fascia will be closed with the current method by the surgeons. There will be a great variation in sutures and techniques used. Study group: the fascia will be closed according

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:All patients undergoing treatment for an abdominal aortic aneurysm in the department of vascular surgery at the Serbian Clinical Centre in Beograd, Serbia, through midline laparotomies are eligible for the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

patients not willing to take part in the follow up visits after informed consent no other exclusion criteria will be used (emergency, previous laparotomy or hernia repair)

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Medical University of Gdansk

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Igor Koncar

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Igor Koncar

Igor Koncar

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Lazar Davidovic, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Belgrade

Zivan Maksimovic, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Belgrade

Filip Muysoms, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Ghent

Locations

Medical University of Gdansk Dept. of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery

Gdansk, , Poland

Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Centre

Belgrade, , Serbia

Countries

Poland; Serbia

Other Identifiers

175008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id