Trial Outcomes & Findings for SUNBURST (Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST) Study (NCT NCT02011893)
NCT ID: NCT02011893
Last Updated: 2019-01-30
Results Overview
Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, from 0 mm to 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
COMPLETED
NA
173 participants
Over 7 days after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulation
2019-01-30
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Enrolled
All subjects enrolled through device activation/randomization
|
Arm 1
Tonic stimulation first, then Burst
|
Arm 2
Burst stimulation first, then Tonic
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
STARTED
|
173
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Baseline
|
141
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Trial Stimulation Implant
|
121
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Permanent Stimulation Implant
|
101
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Randomization
|
100
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
COMPLETED
|
100
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
NOT COMPLETED
|
73
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 1 (Randomization to 12 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
45
|
55
|
|
Period 1 (Randomization to 12 Weeks)
6 Week Follow-up
|
0
|
45
|
52
|
|
Period 1 (Randomization to 12 Weeks)
12 Week Follow-up
|
0
|
45
|
52
|
|
Period 1 (Randomization to 12 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
45
|
52
|
|
Period 1 (Randomization to 12 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Period 2 (12 Weeks to 24 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
45
|
52
|
|
Period 2 (12 Weeks to 24 Weeks)
18 Week Follow-up
|
0
|
44
|
51
|
|
Period 2 (12 Weeks to 24 Weeks)
24 Week Follow-up
|
0
|
45
|
51
|
|
Period 2 (12 Weeks to 24 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
45
|
51
|
|
Period 2 (12 Weeks to 24 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Enrolled
All subjects enrolled through device activation/randomization
|
Arm 1
Tonic stimulation first, then Burst
|
Arm 2
Burst stimulation first, then Tonic
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Adverse Event
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Physician Decision
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Withdrawal by Subject
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Screening Failure
|
29
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Temporary Trial Stimulation Failure
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
|
Enrollment to Randomization
Insurance/Financial Reasons
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 1 (Randomization to 12 Weeks)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Period 1 (Randomization to 12 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Period 2 (12 Weeks to 24 Weeks)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
SUNBURST (Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST) Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Subjects
n=141 Participants
All subjects who were enrolled in the SUNBURST clinical study
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Over 7 days after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulationPopulation: All subjects randomized were analyzed for this outcome measure. Statistical measures were used to impute Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores according the study Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) if data was not available.
Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, from 0 mm to 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Burst Stimulation
n=100 Participants
Burst Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Burst Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
Tonic Stimulation
n=100 Participants
Tonic Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Tonic Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Diary Scores for Average Overall Pain
|
43.5 mm
Standard Deviation 25.6
|
48.7 mm
Standard Deviation 23.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over 7 days at baseline and after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulationPopulation: All subjects randomized were analyzed for this outcome measure. Statistical measures were used to impute Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores according the study Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) if data was not available.
Number of subjects responding to Burst and Tonic Stimulation defined as 30% or greater decrease in overall Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Burst Stimulation
n=100 Participants
Burst Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Burst Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
Tonic Stimulation
n=100 Participants
Tonic Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Tonic Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Response as Measured by Overall Daily Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
|
60 participants
|
51 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During in-office visit after 3 months of treatment while utilizing burst or tonic stimulationPopulation: There were 73 subjects in whom paresthesia coverage data at both the 12 and 24 week visits were available and included in the analysis. The remaining 23 subjects were excluded due to questionnaire completion errors at the time of data collection.
Paresthesia mapping (percentage of paresthesia coverage) analyzed to demonstrate the differences between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Data is presented as areas of paresthesia reported while utilizing either Burst or Tonic Stimulation as a percentage of the total number of areas possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Burst Stimulation
n=73 Participants
Burst Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Burst Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
Tonic Stimulation
n=73 Participants
Tonic Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Tonic Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Paresthesia Coverage
|
4.5 Percentage of paresthesia areas
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
22.7 Percentage of paresthesia areas
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over 7 days after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulationPopulation: All subjects randomized were analyzed for this outcome measure. Statistical measures were used to impute Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores according the study Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) if data was not available.
Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation to evaluate for superiority of Burst Stimulation. Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Burst Stimulation
n=100 Participants
Burst Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Burst Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
Tonic Stimulation
n=100 Participants
Tonic Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Tonic Stimulation: Prodigy Neurostimulation System with associated components
|
|---|---|---|
|
Test for Superiority of Overall Daily Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score With Burst Stimulation
|
43.5 mm
Standard Deviation 25.6
|
48.7 mm
Standard Deviation 23.9
|
Adverse Events
All Subjects
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
All Subjects
n=100 participants at risk;n=173 participants at risk
All subjects who were enrolled in the SUNBURST clinical study
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Temporary paralysis
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
General disorders
Withdrawal symptoms from tapering off oxymorphone
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Persistent pain and/or numbness
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Unsuccessful lead placement
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bowel obstruction
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hip pain/hip replacement
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
General disorders
Low Potassium Levels
|
0.58%
1/173 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancerous tumor on vocal chords
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of speech and memory, and headache
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Scheduled right total knee arthroplasty
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Shortness of breath
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
General disorders
Somnolence
|
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
All Subjects
n=100 participants at risk;n=173 participants at risk
All subjects who were enrolled in the SUNBURST clinical study
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Diminished or loss of symptom relief (Burst Stimulation)
|
5.0%
5/100 • Number of events 5 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
General disorders
Diminished or loss of symptom relief (Tonic Stimulation)
|
6.2%
6/97 • Number of events 8 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
|
General disorders
Persistent pain and/or numbness
|
8.0%
8/100 • Number of events 8 • following enrollment through 6 months of treatment
Subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) are defined as follows: enrollment to device activation (randomization) is 173, device activation (randomization) to 24 weeks is 100. The only events identified as device (stimulation) related are reported per intervention, by therapy (Burst and Tonic Stimulation). The subjects at risk (denominators for risk %) for are defined as follows: subjects active through 12 weeks (100) or subjects active through 24 weeks (97).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER