Evaluation of the ViSiGiTM Calibration System

NCT ID: NCT02008825

Last Updated: 2013-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We hypothesize that using the ViSiGi™ Calibration Tube System in patients undergoing LSG will:

1. enhance delineation of the stomach anatomy and the surgeon's appreciation of the extent of gastric volume to be removed;
2. increase the safety profile of the patient (i.e., reduce the likelihood of accidental stapling of the orogastric tube or bougie);
3. reduce the incidence of OR contamination/infection transmission;
4. streamline OR workflow, resulting in reduced OR time; and
5. ensure consistent and reproducible staple lines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG), is now widely used as a stand-alone procedure for long-term weight loss. With fewer potential morbidities, comparable weight loss and greater ease of conversion to other procedures, many patients now opt for LSG as their bariatric procedure of choice. During surgery gastric decompression and calibration are compulsory for patient safety, gastric anatomic delineation, ease of surgery and optimal weight loss. The removed gastric volume at surgery seems to predict the procedure's success rates2. LSG performed without calibration (tube) could result in inconsistent staple lines, with retained high sleeve volume and consequent failure. Traditionally, although different tubes are used for gastric decompression and calibration, this protocol interrupts operation room (0R) workflow. Accidental stapling of orogastric tubes and bougies do occur in the OR but are seldom reported. The need for this multiple tube system can be obviated with the ViSiGi™ Calibration Tube System. A single, multipurpose tube that integrates all these various steps could prevent breaks in OR; improve workflow; reduce patient injuries, cross contamination and transmission of infections; and a consistent and reproducible staple line. A similar device has been in use in Europe, Australia and Asia, but the ViSiGi™ Calibration Tube System is the first of its kind to be approved by the FDA. Currently, there are no data on its clinical safety/efficacy in comparison to standard care of separate orogastric tube and bougie in the United States. Therefore, this exploratory study will investigate the gastric delineation ability, general safety and efficacy of the ViSiGi™ Calibration Tube System along with the regular bougie in LSG patients over a six- to twelve-month period. Descriptive outcomes will be reported, with no formal sample size calculation in light of the exploratory study design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Enhance Delineation of the Stomach Anatomy and the Surgeon's Appreciation of the Extent of Gastric Volume to be Removed; Increase the Safety Profile of the Patient (i.e., Reduce the Likelihood of Accidental Stapling of the Orogastric Tube or Bougie); Reduce the Incidence of OR Contamination/Infection Transmission; Streamline OR Workflow, Resulting in Reduced OR Time Ensure Consistent and Reproducible Staple Lines.

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

ViSiGi Calibration tube Sleeve gastrectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ViSiGi

Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube

Usual standard of care

Usual non suction Bougie

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual non suction Bougie

Intervention Type DEVICE

Usual non suction Bougie

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube

Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Usual non suction Bougie

Usual non suction Bougie

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ViSiGi 3D

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ability to provide written informed consent for study participation.
* age 18 years or older
* candidate for laparosopic gastrectomy with no history of previous bariatric surgeries (i.e., gastric bypass, band, duodenal switch)attendance at an informational seminar and support group
* clearance for surgery by a registered dietician and certified social worker
* BMI \> 35 with at least one co-morbid condition (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, hypercholesterolemia) or BMI \> 40 without any co-morbid conditions
* negative pregnancy test
* American Society of Anesthesiology score 1-3
* ability to understand instructions and comply with all study requirements
* pre-operative %excess weight loss (%EWL) of 3-10%
* no contraindication for LSG based on upper endoscopy findings
* pre-operative cardiac consultation for risk stratification
* evaluation by a sleep medicine specialist to identify risk factors for sleep apnea, with treatment as deemed appropriate

Exclusion Criteria

* current participation in another clinical trial that involves any investigational drug or device that would interfere with this study
* Barrett's Esophagus, severe gastric paresis/atony, achalasia, neoplasm or other complications discovered during preoperative esophago-gastro-duodonoscopy.
* revisional surgery
* conversion to open procedure
* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boehringer Ingelheim

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network, Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Leonardo Claros

Bariatric Section Chief and Program Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint Luke's University and Health Network

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Leonardo Claros, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 4844262600

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Leonardo Claros

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Satiani B, Bonner JT, Stone HH. Factors influencing intraoperative gastric regurgitation: a prospective random study of nasogastric tube drainage. Arch Surg. 1978 Jun;113(6):721-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370180063008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26318 (View on PubMed)

Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, Jacobi C, Makarewicz W, Weigand G. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007 Oct;17(10):1297-305. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9232-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18098398 (View on PubMed)

Abu-Gazala S, Donchin Y, Keidar A. Nasogastric tube, temperature probe, and bougie stapling during bariatric surgery: a multicenter survey. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Sep-Oct;8(5):595-600; discussion 600-1. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21963196 (View on PubMed)

Pequignot A, Dhahria A, Mensah E, Verhaeghe P, Badaoui R, Sabbagh C, Regimbeau JM. Stapling and Section of the Nasogastric Tube during Sleeve Gastrectomy: How to Prevent and Recover? Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011;5(2):350-4. doi: 10.1159/000329706. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21769286 (View on PubMed)

Sanchez BS, Safadi BY, Kieran JA, Hsu GP, Brodsky JB, Curet MJ, Morton JM. Orogastric tube complications in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006 Apr;16(4):443-7. doi: 10.1381/096089206776327350.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16608608 (View on PubMed)

Vennes JA. Infectious complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 1981 Jul;26(7 Suppl):60S-64S. doi: 10.1007/BF01300809.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6765053 (View on PubMed)

Kovaleva J, Peters FT, van der Mei HC, Degener JE. Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Apr;26(2):231-54. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00085-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23554415 (View on PubMed)

Schembre DB. Infectious complications associated with gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2000 Apr;10(2):215-32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10683209 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.visigi.com

ViSiGi web site

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SLHN2013-62

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id