Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. enhance delineation of the stomach anatomy and the surgeon's appreciation of the extent of gastric volume to be removed;
2. increase the safety profile of the patient (i.e., reduce the likelihood of accidental stapling of the orogastric tube or bougie);
3. reduce the incidence of OR contamination/infection transmission;
4. streamline OR workflow, resulting in reduced OR time; and
5. ensure consistent and reproducible staple lines.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ViSiGi
Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube
Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube
Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube
Usual standard of care
Usual non suction Bougie
Usual non suction Bougie
Usual non suction Bougie
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube
Utilization of ViSiGi calibration tube
Usual non suction Bougie
Usual non suction Bougie
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 18 years or older
* candidate for laparosopic gastrectomy with no history of previous bariatric surgeries (i.e., gastric bypass, band, duodenal switch)attendance at an informational seminar and support group
* clearance for surgery by a registered dietician and certified social worker
* BMI \> 35 with at least one co-morbid condition (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, hypercholesterolemia) or BMI \> 40 without any co-morbid conditions
* negative pregnancy test
* American Society of Anesthesiology score 1-3
* ability to understand instructions and comply with all study requirements
* pre-operative %excess weight loss (%EWL) of 3-10%
* no contraindication for LSG based on upper endoscopy findings
* pre-operative cardiac consultation for risk stratification
* evaluation by a sleep medicine specialist to identify risk factors for sleep apnea, with treatment as deemed appropriate
Exclusion Criteria
* Barrett's Esophagus, severe gastric paresis/atony, achalasia, neoplasm or other complications discovered during preoperative esophago-gastro-duodonoscopy.
* revisional surgery
* conversion to open procedure
* pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boehringer Ingelheim
INDUSTRY
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network, Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Leonardo Claros
Bariatric Section Chief and Program Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Saint Luke's University and Health Network
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Leonardo Claros
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Satiani B, Bonner JT, Stone HH. Factors influencing intraoperative gastric regurgitation: a prospective random study of nasogastric tube drainage. Arch Surg. 1978 Jun;113(6):721-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370180063008.
Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, Jacobi C, Makarewicz W, Weigand G. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007 Oct;17(10):1297-305. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9232-x.
Abu-Gazala S, Donchin Y, Keidar A. Nasogastric tube, temperature probe, and bougie stapling during bariatric surgery: a multicenter survey. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Sep-Oct;8(5):595-600; discussion 600-1. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
Pequignot A, Dhahria A, Mensah E, Verhaeghe P, Badaoui R, Sabbagh C, Regimbeau JM. Stapling and Section of the Nasogastric Tube during Sleeve Gastrectomy: How to Prevent and Recover? Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011;5(2):350-4. doi: 10.1159/000329706. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
Sanchez BS, Safadi BY, Kieran JA, Hsu GP, Brodsky JB, Curet MJ, Morton JM. Orogastric tube complications in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006 Apr;16(4):443-7. doi: 10.1381/096089206776327350.
Vennes JA. Infectious complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 1981 Jul;26(7 Suppl):60S-64S. doi: 10.1007/BF01300809.
Kovaleva J, Peters FT, van der Mei HC, Degener JE. Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Apr;26(2):231-54. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00085-12.
Schembre DB. Infectious complications associated with gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2000 Apr;10(2):215-32.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
ViSiGi web site
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SLHN2013-62
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id