Prehospital Tranexamic Acid Use for Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT ID: NCT01990768
Last Updated: 2019-01-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
967 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-05-31
2017-11-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary hypothesis: The null hypothesis is that random assignment to prehospital administration of TXA in patients with moderate to severe TBI will not change the proportion of patients with a favorable long-term neurologic outcome compared to random assignment to placebo, based on the GOS-E at 6 months.
Secondary aims: To determine differences between TXA and placebo in the following outcomes for patients with moderate to severe TBI treated in the prehospital setting with 2 dosing regimens of TXA:
* Clinical outcomes: ICH progression, Marshall and Rotterdam CT classification scores, DRS at discharge and 6 months, GOS-E at discharge, 28-day survival, frequency of neurosurgical interventions, and ventilator-free, ICU-free, and hospital-free days.
* Safety outcomes: Development of seizures, cerebral ischemic events, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary thromboembolism.
* Mechanistic outcomes: Alterations in fibrinolysis based on fibrinolytic pathway mediators and degree of clot lysis based on TEG.
Inclusion: Blunt and penetrating traumatic mechanism consistent with TBI with prehospital GCS ≤ 12 prior to administration of sedative and/or paralytic agents, prehospital SBP ≥ 90 mmHg, prehospital intravenous (IV) access, age ≥ 15yrs (or weight ≥ 50kg if age is unknown), EMS transport destination based on standard local practices determined to be a participating trauma center.
Exclusion: Prehospital GCS=3 with no reactive pupil, estimated time from injury to start of study drug bolus dose \>2 hours, unknown time of injury, clinical suspicion by EMS of seizure activity, acute MI or stroke or known history, to the extent possible, of seizures, thromboembolic disorders or renal dialysis, CPR by EMS prior to randomization, burns \> 20% TBSA, suspected or known prisoners, suspected or known pregnancy, prehospital TXA or other pro-coagulant drug given prior to randomization, subjects who have activated the "opt-out" process when required by the local regulatory board.
A multi-center double-blind randomized controlled trial with 3 treatment arms:
* Bolus/maintenance: 1 gram IV TXA bolus in the prehospital setting followed by a 1 gram IV maintenance infusion initiated on hospital arrival and infused over 8 hours.
* Bolus only: 2 grams IV TXA bolus in the prehospital setting followed by a placebo maintenance infusion initiated on hospital arrival and infused over 8 hours.
* Placebo: Placebo IV bolus in the prehospital setting followed by a placebo maintenance infusion initiated on hospital arrival and infused over 8 hours.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Effect of Tranexamic Acid on the Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT06330935
Tranexamic Acid in Chronic Subdural Hematomas
NCT02568124
The Use of Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Symptomatic Subdural Hematoma
NCT05713630
Hypertonic Resuscitation Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
NCT00316004
Tranexamic Acid with Intensive Blood Pressure Management in Ultra-Early Intracerebral Hemorrhage
NCT06760078
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Specific Aims/Hypothesis Statement
2.1 Clinical Hypotheses and Aims
Specific aim 1: To compare 6-month neurologic outcome between subjects who are randomly assigned to TXA to subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo by evaluating the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score (GOS-E) at 6 months post-injury.
Primary Hypotheses: We will perform a one-sided test of the following null hypothesis: The proportion of subjects who have a favorable neurologic outcome (GOS-E \> 4) at six months post injury who are randomly assigned to TXA is not different from the proportion of subjects who have a favorable neurologic outcome (GOS-E \> 4) who are randomly assigned to placebo. This hypothesis will be tested versus the alternative that the proportion of subjects with a favorable neurologic outcome who are randomly assigned to TXA is higher than in subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo at the .1 level and versus the alternative that the proportion of subjects with a favorable neurologic outcome who are randomly assigned to TXA is lower than it is in the placebo group at the .025 level
Specific aim 2: To assess differences in morbidity and mortality measured from randomization through 28 days or initial hospital discharge and differences in neurologic outcomes at 6 months between subjects in the bolus/maintenance arm, bolus only arm, and placebo arm.
Secondary Hypotheses: The null hypotheses are that there will be no difference between subjects who are randomly assigned to TXA and subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo in the following: both absolute and relative volume of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression, proportion of subjects with ICH progression, frequency of neurosurgical interventions, GOS-E measured at discharge and 6 months, Disability Rating Scale score (DRS) measured at discharge and 6 months, 28-day survival, and ventilator-free, intensive care unit (ICU)-free, and hospital-free days.
Specific aim 3: To assess differences in adverse events measured from randomization to initial hospital discharge between subjects in the bolus/maintenance arm, bolus only arm, and placebo arm.
Tertiary Hypotheses: The null hypotheses are that there will be no difference between subjects who are randomly assigned to TXA and subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo in the following: proportion of subjects experiencing seizures, cerebral ischemic events, myocardial infarction (MI), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), or pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) post randomization through 28 days or discharge, whichever occurs first.
2.2 Laboratory Hypotheses and Aims
Specific aim 1: To compare coagulation profiles over time using kaolin activated thrombelastography (TEG) results between subjects who are randomly assigned to TXA and subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo.
Primary hypothesis: The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in the degree of fibrinolysis as assessed by percentage of clot lysis determined 30 minutes after the maximum amplitude is reached (LY30) between subjects who are randomly assigned to TXA and subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo.
Specific aim 2: To explore the underlying mechanism of TXA by comparing fibrinolytic pathway mediator activity between subjects who are randomly assigned to TXA and subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo.
Secondary hypothesis: The null hypothesis is that there will be no change in fibrinolytic pathway mediators between subjects who are randomly assigned to TXA and subjects who are randomly assigned to placebo.
Specific aim 3: To estimate the association between the degree of fibrinolysis based on kaolin activated TEG results and fibrinolytic pathway mediators on primary and secondary clinical outcomes.
Tertiary hypothesis: The null hypothesis is that no association will exist between the degree of fibrinolysis and fibrinolytic pathway mediators and primary and secondary clinical outcomes.
3. Study Enrollment
EMS agencies will carry blinded sealed study drug kits. Once the seal is broken in the presence of the patient, the patient is randomized. The EMS study drug kit will contain a vial of either 1 gram TXA, 2 grams TXA, or placebo. EMS will mix the study drug in a 250 mL bag of 0.9% sodium chloride and administer the bolus infusion as soon as life-saving interventions are performed. After randomization, EMS will provide the study drug kit ID# to the receiving pharmacy. The hospital pharmacist will obtain the randomization assignment from the coordinating center and prepare the appropriate drug to be administered in the hospital.
4. Sample Size and Statistical Analysis
The total sample size is 963 (321 per group) starting treatment, which will allow for 80% power to detect a 7.1% absolute difference in favorable long-term neurological outcome as determined by the GOS-E 6 months after injury comparing the combined TXA treatment groups to placebo, using a one-sided, level 0.1 test.
Statistical analysis of primary hypothesis: Modified intention-to-treat analysis using logistic regression to test for association and estimate the strength of the association of treatment group with a favorable 6-month outcome (defined as a GOS-E \> 4), after adjustment for study site.
5. Human subjects protection
This study qualifies for the exception from informed consent (EFIC) required for emergency research outlined in FDA regulation 21CFR50.24. EFIC applies because of life-threatening situation, intervention must be administered before consent is feasible, no reasonable way to identify prospectively individuals at risk, patients have the prospect of benefit from the treatment, and the research could not practically be carried out without the waiver of consent.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1 gram Tranexamic Acid (TXA)
Loading dose of 1 gram TXA given prior to hospital arrival followed by a 1 gram TXA infusion over 8 hours after hospital arrival
1 gram Tranexamic Acid (TXA)
TXA produces an antifibrinolytic effect by competitively inhibiting the activation of plasminogen to plasmin.
2 grams TXA
Loading dose of 2 gram TXA given prior to hospital arrival followed by a placebo of 0.9% Sodium Chloride solution infusion over 8 hours after hospital arrival
2 grams TXA
TXA produces an antifibrinolytic effect by competitively inhibiting the activation of plasminogen to plasmin.
0.9% Sodium Chloride injectable
Loading dose of 0.9% Sodium Chloride solution given prior to hospital arrival followed by a placebo of 0.9% Sodium Chloride solution infusion over 8 hours after hospital arrival
0.9% Sodium Chloride injectable
Loading dose of 0.9% Sodium Chloride solution given prior to hospital arrival followed by a placebo of 0.9% Sodium Chloride solution infusion over 8 hours after hospital arrival. No active drug is added to the solution.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1 gram Tranexamic Acid (TXA)
TXA produces an antifibrinolytic effect by competitively inhibiting the activation of plasminogen to plasmin.
2 grams TXA
TXA produces an antifibrinolytic effect by competitively inhibiting the activation of plasminogen to plasmin.
0.9% Sodium Chloride injectable
Loading dose of 0.9% Sodium Chloride solution given prior to hospital arrival followed by a placebo of 0.9% Sodium Chloride solution infusion over 8 hours after hospital arrival. No active drug is added to the solution.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Prehospital Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) score ≤ 12 at any time prior to randomization and administration of sedative and/or paralytic agents
3. Prehospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 90 mmHg prior to randomization
4. Prehospital intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) access
5. Estimated Age ≥ 15 (or estimated weight \> 50 kg if age is unknown)
6. Emergency Medicine System (EMS) transport to a participating trauma center
Exclusion Criteria
2. Estimated time from injury to hospital arrival \> 2 hours
3. Unknown time of injury - no known reference times to support estimation
4. Clinical suspicion by EMS of seizure activity or known history of seizures, acute myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke
5. Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by EMS prior to randomization
6. Burns \> 20% total body surface area (TBSA)
7. Suspected or known prisoners
8. Suspected or known pregnancy
9. Prehospital TXA given prior to randomization
10. Subjects who have activated the "opt-out" process when required by the local regulatory board
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
FED
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
OTHER
American Heart Association
OTHER
Defence Research and Development Canada
INDUSTRY
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Susanne May
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susanne May, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Martin Schreiber, MD FACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alabama Resuscitation Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
St Paul Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health & Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Dallas Center for Resuscitation Research
Dallas, Texas, United States
Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Milwaukee Resuscitation Research Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
British Columbia Regional Coordinating Center
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Toronto RescuNet
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rowell S, Meier EN, Hoyos Gomez T, Fleming M, Jui J, Morrison L, Bulger E, Sopko G, Weisfeldt M, Christenson J, Klotz P, McMullan J, Callum J, Sheehan K, Tibbs B, Aufderheide T, Cotton B, Gandhi R, Idris A, Frascone RJ, Ferrara M, Richmond N, Kannas D, Schlamp R, Robinson B, Dries D, Tallon J, Hendrickson A, Gamber M, Garrett J, Simonson R, McKinley WI, Schreiber M. The effects of prehospital TXA on mortality and neurologic outcomes in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: A subgroup analysis from the prehospital TXA for TBI trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Oct 1;97(4):572-580. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004354. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
Hoefer LE, Benjamin AJ, Polcari AM, Schreiber MA, Zakrison TL, Rowell SE. TXA does not affect levels of TBI-related biomarkers in blunt TBI with ICH: A secondary analysis of the prehospital TXA for TBI trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 1;96(1):94-100. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004130. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
Harmer JW, Dewey EN, Meier EN, Rowell SE, Schreiber MA. Tranexamic acid is not inferior to placebo with respect to adverse events in suspected traumatic brain injury patients not in shock with a normal head computed tomography scan: A retrospective study of a randomized trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jul 1;93(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003635. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Rowell SE, Meier EN, McKnight B, Kannas D, May S, Sheehan K, Bulger EM, Idris AH, Christenson J, Morrison LJ, Frascone RJ, Bosarge PL, Colella MR, Johannigman J, Cotton BA, Callum J, McMullan J, Dries DJ, Tibbs B, Richmond NJ, Weisfeldt ML, Tallon JM, Garrett JS, Zielinski MD, Aufderheide TP, Gandhi RR, Schlamp R, Robinson BRH, Jui J, Klein L, Rizoli S, Gamber M, Fleming M, Hwang J, Vincent LE, Williams C, Hendrickson A, Simonson R, Klotz P, Sopko G, Witham W, Ferrara M, Schreiber MA. Effect of Out-of-Hospital Tranexamic Acid vs Placebo on 6-Month Functional Neurologic Outcomes in Patients With Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA. 2020 Sep 8;324(10):961-974. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8958.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form: Protocol in force at beginning of enrollment
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form: Protocol after Amendment 2
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form: Protocol after Amendment 2.1
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TATRC Log No. 13335004-A
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
47114
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.