Clinical Effect Size of an Educational Intervention in the Home and Compliance on People Who Suffer From Stroke
NCT ID: NCT01980641
Last Updated: 2019-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods. Design. Randomized clinical trial. Participants. Total sample: 80 adults who have suffered a stroke with moderate severity and who have been discharged to their homes.Outcome variables. BI, FIM, MMSE, CNS, SIS-16, TCT, MRS, MSPSS, QLSF, FRT, RT, TUG, TST, a portable dynamometer and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Data analysis. Descriptive analyses will include mean and 95% CI of the values for each variable. The Kolmogov-Smirnov (KS) test and a 2x2 mixed model ANOVA will be used. Intergroup effect sizes will be calculated (Cohen's d).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Mirror Therapy and Cognitive Therapeutic Exercise in Stroke Patients
NCT04163666
Effectiveness of a Public Campaign to Increase Stroke Awareness in Reducing Prehospital Delay
NCT01881152
The Effectiveness of Multimodal Educational Intervention to Improve Adherence to Treatment Regimens in Older Stroke Patients
NCT02842840
Decision Support System for Stroke Survivors
NCT03580642
Early Occupational Therapy Intervention in the Hospital Discharge After Stroke
NCT04835363
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods. This study is a randomized clinical trial. Participants. The total sample will consist of 80 adults who have suffered a stroke with moderate severity and who have been discharged to their homes in the 3 months prior to recruitment to the study. Outcome variables. Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Canadian Neurological Scale, the Stroke Impact Scale-16, the Trunk Control Test, the Modified Rankin Scale, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, the Quality of Life Scale for Stroke, the Functional Reach test, the Romberg test, the Time Up and Go, the Timed-Stands Test, a portable dynamometer and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Data analysis. Descriptive analyses will include mean and 95% confidence intervals of the values for each variable. The Kolmogov-Smirnov (KS) test and a 2x2 mixed model ANOVA will be used. Intergroup effect sizes will be calculated (Cohen's d).
Sample Size Calculation A power analysis was conducted using the program G\*Power 3.1. A priori, a sample of approximately 40 participants per group for the stage 1 intervention is needed to detect a significant difference (17.3 in the FIM) between the experimental group and the control group (effect size d=0.59, alpha=.05, beta=.08). The randomization will be performed by a blinded researcher.
Procedure. Stage 1 will begin with the collection of the participants' demographic data through a questionnaire and by conducting various tests to measure primary and secondary outcome variables. Subsequently, the ergonomics of the home and the implementation of ADL from both the experimental group and the control group will be assessed using the HTAS tool, which was developed by the authors. For the development of the tool, a literature review was performed using the PubMed electronic database and by reviewing different practice guides about stroke. Subsequently, the HTAS tool was evaluated by a panel of experts composed of occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses, caregivers, and patients.
Following the assessment of each participant's home and his or her performance of ADL, the therapist will provide the participants of the experimental group with a list of pieces of advice related to the HTAS items that were evaluated negatively. The advice will be aimed at changing the environment in which the participants execute the ADL. This may include facilitation in the execution of the ADL, promoting the active use of the affected side of the body in such execution, or to show them the most appropriate way of performing certain tasks according to their situation after the stroke.
The evaluation of the variables and the execution of the advised tasks will be carried out at participants' homes 2 and 4 weeks following the initial assessment. Researchers will analyze and compare the data obtained from the outcome variables of the experimental group and the control group to check whether the educational intervention was effective in patients who have suffered stroke and who have been discharged to their homes. If the hypothesis is confirmed, the educational intervention would be implemented in the control group.
Stage 2 For the pilot study in stage 2, one group will receive the app reminders on their mobile phones (MPG) and another group will not (NMPG). Placement in the first group depends on whether the participant has a mobile phone and if its characteristics are adapted to the requirements of the study. The app will provide the advice previously given by the therapist in the participants' homes. The timing of reminders will differ for each participant depending on the amount of advice given. However, in the 4 weeks of the app being used, each piece of advice will be given three times. The mobile phone will beep once for each piece of advice and the participant must check and mark the option indicating whether he has or has not complied with the advice. After this period, the outcome variables will be analyzed in both groups to check whether there are differences between the MPGand NMPG groups.
After 8 weeks, and after having removed the app from mobile phones of the MPG, we will reanalyze the outcome variables. Will do this by testing both groups to see whether the MPGparticipants have continued to perform the advised tasks provided by the therapist, and if differences still exist between them and the NGS group. If so, a reminder system will be implemented in the NMPG.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Assessment of each participant's home and his or her performance of ADL.
No interventions assigned to this group
Experimental group
Educational intervention: Assessment of each participant's home and his or her performance of ADL and the therapist will provide to the participants of the experimental group a list of advice related to the HTAS items that are evaluated negatively.
Educational intervention
All subjects received an educational intervention consist in an educational advice provides by the therapist to improve the adherence of the treatment.
Application smartphone-based group
Smartphone-based application group (SG) sample will have a reminder. The app will provide the advice previously given by the therapist in the participants' homes.
Educational intervention
All subjects received an educational intervention consist in an educational advice provides by the therapist to improve the adherence of the treatment.
Smartphone-based application
Smartphone-based application group (SG) sample will have a reminder. The app will provide the advice previously given by the therapist in the participants' homes.
Non Application smartphone-based group
Non Smartphone-based application group (NSG) sample won't have a reminder
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Educational intervention
All subjects received an educational intervention consist in an educational advice provides by the therapist to improve the adherence of the treatment.
Smartphone-based application
Smartphone-based application group (SG) sample will have a reminder. The app will provide the advice previously given by the therapist in the participants' homes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A score from 20 to 50 on Barthel Index
* A score from 35 to 75 on Functional Independence Measure
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to walk 3 meters without physical assistance
* Inability to stay standing more than 30 "without physical support
* Serious communication or comprehension problems
* Surgical intervention in lower limbs 12 months prior to recruitment
* Secondary neurological pathology
* Severe cardiovascular, respiratory, orthopedic or metabolic problems
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Malaga
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio I Cuesta Vargas, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Malaga
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IBIMA
Málaga, Malaag, Spain
Patronato Municipal de deportes de Torremolinos
Torremolinos, Malaga, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Crocker TF, Brown L, Lam N, Wray F, Knapp P, Forster A. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):CD001919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub4.
Merchan-Baeza JA, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas A. Clinical effect size of an educational intervention in the home and compliance with mobile phone-based reminders for people who suffer from stroke: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Mar 10;4(1):e33. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4034.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
University of Malaga
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FCCSS-15-2013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.