Using Ultrasound to Predict the Results of Draining Pleural Effusions

NCT ID: NCT01973985

Last Updated: 2018-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-01

Study Completion Date

2017-05-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pleural effusion is an extremely common problem with multiple causes; its subsequent investigation with thoracocentesis and treatment with drainage represent two of the most frequently performed diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures. The role of thoracic ultrasonography in the management of pleural effusion is a modern and rapidly expanding one, having become effectively mandatory and part of the "gold standard" over the past decade due to its diagnostic and patient safety benefits. By contrast, the measurement of intra-pleural pressure using sequential manometry has failed to convincingly demonstrate its clinical value beyond physiological studies despite its availability for over a century. Previous work has shown a potential role for pleural manometry in predicting the presence of un-expandable lung and success of talc pleurodesis but these studies have not been replicated or clinically validated.

We intend to combine the old and new in an observational study comparing findings on thoracic ultrasonography and pleural manometry during thoracocentesis with patient-reported symptoms and the key clinical outcomes of presence of un-expandable lung and success of talc pleurodesis. The investigators hypothesise that the previously described variations in pleural elastance can be correlated with appearances and anatomical changes visualised on thoracic ultrasonography; and in combination can be reliably utilised to predict clinical outcome. The study may allow the proposal of a treatment algorithm that allows patients with pleural effusion to be managed in a more expeditious and efficient manner.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study-specific interventions will be the monitoring of intrapleural pressure using an electronic pleural manometer (Mirador Biomedical CompassTM Thoracentesis Assist Device) and thoracic ultrasonography. Both of these are considered non-invasive and low-risk to the study participants.

As part of their standard usual clinical care, participants will undergo a diagnostic and/or therapeutic pleural intervention in the form of thoracocentesis or pleural aspiration; intercostal chest drain insertion; and/or talc pleurodesis. All of these procedures are invasive and associated with potential complications that participants will be informed about as part of standard informed consent procedures. These interventions will however be clinically indicated and carried out whether or not an individual chooses to participate in this study. For those individuals who do participate in the study, any complications of these standard clinical care procedures will be recorded as part of the data collection process for the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pleural Effusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pleural Manometry

Intrapleural pressure will be monitored with the use of an electronic pleural manometer (Mirador Biomedical CompassTM Thoracentesis Assist Device).

Intervention Type OTHER

Thoracic ultrasonography

Thoracic ultrasound scan will be done before drainage of pleural effusion - all participants.

Thoracic ultrasound scans will also be done during drainage of pleural effusion and the results will be recorded after every 100mL of pleural fluid drained - all participants.

Thoracic ultrasound scan will be done after drainage of pleural effusion - all participants.

Thoracic ultrasound scan will also be be done during clinic follow-up as part of routine clinical care - all participants.

Intervention Type OTHER

Pleural aspiration catheter OR chest drain (standard care)

Insertion of pleural aspiration catheter OR intercostal chest drain under ultrasound guidance - all participants (standard care).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Talc slurry pleurodesis via chest drain (standard care)

Talc slurry pleurodesis via intercostal chest drain where/when clinically indicated as part of routine clinical care participants with intercostal chest drain only (standard care).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
* Adult male or female, aged 18 years or above.
* Diagnosed with a symptomatic pleural effusion requiring either diagnostic and/or therapeutic pleural aspiration or drainage.
* Expectation by the clinician responsible for assessing the patient that more than 500mL of pleural fluid will be drained on this particular occasion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age less than 18 years
* Inability to provide informed consent
* Evidence of significant septation or loculation within the pleural effusion as determined by the clinician responsible for assessing the patient.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Najib Rahman, DPhil, MSc, MRCP

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Oxford & Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

John Corcoran, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Oxford

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Churchill Hospital

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PLMAN2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.