Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter Safety and Efficacy Study of Intraprostatic PRX302 for LUTS BPH

NCT ID: NCT01966614

Last Updated: 2017-04-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

479 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single treatment of PRX302 for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) as compared to placebo.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PRX302

PRX302 injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PRX302

Intervention Type DRUG

Single intraprostatic bilateral injection at a dose of 0.6 µg/g

Placebo

Placebo (Vehicle-only injection)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Single intraprostatic bilateral injection of vehicle only

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PRX302

Single intraprostatic bilateral injection at a dose of 0.6 µg/g

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Single intraprostatic bilateral injection of vehicle only

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

topsalysin Vehicle-only

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥50 years
* Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) attributable to BPH for ≥6 months
* IPSS ≥15
* Maximum urine flow (Qmax) of 5 - 15 mL/sec
* Prostate volume of 30 - 100 mL as determined by TRUS
* Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values \<10 ng/mL
* Post-void residual (PVR) \<= 200 mL

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to void ≥125 mL urine
* Prior surgery/MIST for BPH
* Presence of or history of certain conditions that could interfere with study results or endanger subject
* Use of certain prescribed medications that could interfere with study results
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sophiris Bio Corp

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard C Yocum, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sophiris Bio Corp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Tarzana, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Middlebury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Greenbelt, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brookline, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Mount Laurel, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Garden City, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, New York, United States

Site Status

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burien, Washington, United States

Site Status

Daw Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Woodville South, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Mentone, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Whau Valley, Whangarei, New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Chernihiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada New Zealand Russia Ukraine

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRX302-3-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RT-310 Safety and Feasibility BPH Study
NCT07264205 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
RT-310 Dose Escalation BPH Study
NCT06136819 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1