Comparison of Insulin Therapy in Treating Post-Transplant Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT01963728
Last Updated: 2022-07-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-27
2015-04-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Inova Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Study
NCT02222623
A Comparison of Exenatide and Insulin Glargine
NCT02325960
A Trial Comparing the Efficacy, Patient-reported Outcomes and Safety of Insulin Degludec 200 U/mL vs Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Requiring High-dose Insulin
NCT01570751
Insulin Glargine Injection Treatment in Place of Thiazolidinedione (TZD), Sulfonylurea, or Metformin in Triple Agent Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Adult Subjects With Unsatisfactory Control
NCT00283049
Lantus Versus NPH: Comparison in Insulin Naive People Not Adequately Controlled With at Least One Oral Anti Diabetics (OAD) Treatment
NCT00949442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Management of glucose levels in NODAT often requires insulin therapy. Standard practice is to start long-acting insulin. However, patients with NODAT often exhibit fasting morning glucose levels that are relatively low compared to pre-lunch and pre-dinner glucose levels. This seems to make NODAT patients more susceptible to fasting, or morning, hypoglycemia on long-acting insulin analogues than non-transplant patients with type II diabetes. This phenomenon of morning hypoglycemia in NODAT often limits the up-titration of basal insulin resulting in suboptimal treatment of hyperglycemia later in the day. Because of this pattern, transplant patients may respond better to morning insulin isophane (intermediate acting) than to long-acting insulin glargine preparations.
Our trial is designed to compare morning NPH insulin (isophane insulin) with conventional therapy of basal glargine insulin on both continuous blood glucose levels and hemoglobin A1c (glycosylated hemoglobin).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
1. Insulin glargine (Lantus) or
2. Insulin isophane (NPH)
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
insulin isophane
daily dose will be titrated based on fasting morning glucose values
Insulin, Isophane
daily dosing based on fasting morning glucose levels
insulin glargine
daily dose will be titrated based on fasting morning glucose values
insulin glargine
daily dose based on fasting morning glucose levels
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Insulin, Isophane
daily dosing based on fasting morning glucose levels
insulin glargine
daily dose based on fasting morning glucose levels
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diabetes mellitus inadequately responsive to lifestyle modification and non-insulin hypoglycemic medication
3. Need for subcutaneous insulin therapy (after discontinuation of IV insulin therapy, if it was required)
4. Ability to read consent form and give consent in English.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Cystic fibrosis patients
3. Age \< 18 years of age
4. Pregnancy
5. Non-English speaking subjects
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Inova Health Care Services
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Ross, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Inova Healthcare Services
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Inova NODAT-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.