Comparison of Insulin Therapy in Treating Post-Transplant Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01963728

Last Updated: 2022-07-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-27

Study Completion Date

2015-04-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine if the use of insulin isophane results in improved control of blood sugars compared to the use of insulin glargine in new onset diabetes after kidney, lung, or heart transplantation (NODAT).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A large percentage of organ transplant recipients develop de novo diabetes mellitus after transplantation, also called "New Onset Diabetes After Transplant" or NODAT. The cause of the diabetes appears to be commonly used anti-rejection medications, particularly calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids.

Management of glucose levels in NODAT often requires insulin therapy. Standard practice is to start long-acting insulin. However, patients with NODAT often exhibit fasting morning glucose levels that are relatively low compared to pre-lunch and pre-dinner glucose levels. This seems to make NODAT patients more susceptible to fasting, or morning, hypoglycemia on long-acting insulin analogues than non-transplant patients with type II diabetes. This phenomenon of morning hypoglycemia in NODAT often limits the up-titration of basal insulin resulting in suboptimal treatment of hyperglycemia later in the day. Because of this pattern, transplant patients may respond better to morning insulin isophane (intermediate acting) than to long-acting insulin glargine preparations.

Our trial is designed to compare morning NPH insulin (isophane insulin) with conventional therapy of basal glargine insulin on both continuous blood glucose levels and hemoglobin A1c (glycosylated hemoglobin).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Subjects will be randomized to

1. Insulin glargine (Lantus) or
2. Insulin isophane (NPH)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

insulin isophane

daily dose will be titrated based on fasting morning glucose values

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Insulin, Isophane

Intervention Type DRUG

daily dosing based on fasting morning glucose levels

insulin glargine

daily dose will be titrated based on fasting morning glucose values

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

insulin glargine

Intervention Type DRUG

daily dose based on fasting morning glucose levels

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Insulin, Isophane

daily dosing based on fasting morning glucose levels

Intervention Type DRUG

insulin glargine

daily dose based on fasting morning glucose levels

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

human NPH Lantus

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Must be followed by the Inova Fairfax Hospital transplantation program for post-transplant care
2. Diabetes mellitus inadequately responsive to lifestyle modification and non-insulin hypoglycemic medication
3. Need for subcutaneous insulin therapy (after discontinuation of IV insulin therapy, if it was required)
4. Ability to read consent form and give consent in English.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Use of insulin or non-insulin hypoglycemic medication before transplantation
2. Cystic fibrosis patients
3. Age \< 18 years of age
4. Pregnancy
5. Non-English speaking subjects
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Inova Health Care Services

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Ross, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Inova Healthcare Services

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Inova Fairfax Hospital

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Inova NODAT-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.