Days in Motion: A Planning Intervention Study With Couples to Enhance Daily Physical Activity
NCT ID: NCT01963494
Last Updated: 2016-01-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
346 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to examine changes in daily moderate physical activity in couples following (a) a dyadic planning intervention, (b) an individual planning intervention or (c) a no-planning control condition. Changes in daily physical activity will be examined over a period of one year.
It is assumed that target persons from couples receiving a dyadic planning intervention will show greater increases in daily physical activity than target persons from couples receiving an individual planning intervention. For couples receiving a dyadic planning intervention or an individual planning intervention, it is hypothesized that target persons will show higher increases in daily physical activity than target persons from couples participating in the no-planning control condition.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stage-based Exercise Promotion Study
NCT01289145
Effects of Individual, Dyadic, and Collaborative Plans on Physical Activity in Partner-Partner Dyads
NCT03011385
Effects of Self-efficacy, Planning, and Self-efficacy+Planning Interventions on Body Fat Among Adolescents
NCT02689973
Effects of Individual, Dyadic, and Collaborative Plans on Physical Activity in Patient-Partner Dyads
NCT02712255
Evaluation of a Couple-Based Physical Activity Intervention
NCT06073951
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite this relatively moderate recommended increase in physical activity and an apparently high acceptance of goals to increase moderate daily physical activity, many people fall short of goal achievement, as the implementation and maintenance of behaviour change often fails. Therefore, aside from enhancing motivational factors, interventions promoting health-behaviour change (e.g., increase in physical activity), are now commonly extended to address volitional strategies, such as action planning. Action planning aids individuals in translating their goals into behaviour. By forming action plans, individuals link situational cues ('when' and 'where' specifications of critical situations) to behavioural responses ('what to do' or 'how to act') in an 'if-then'-format. Available findings suggest that action planning aside from its direct effects on behaviour change, including increase in physical activity, also fosters other self-regulation strategies that are effective in the implementation and maintenance of changes in health-related behaviour. Research on action planning so far mainly focuses on its benefits for the individual's self-regulation of behaviour. To date there is little evidence on the role of the close social environment in planning health-behaviour change. However, married and cohabiting individuals often try to and succeed in coregulating their partners' health behaviour, including partners' levels of physical activity. Therefore, in the proposed study, an extension of individual action planning to the level of the dyad, i.e., dyadic planning, will be examined, along with associated mechanisms fit to aid the process of increasing physical activity. Dyadic planning refers to creating together with a partner if-then plans on when, where and how the individual target person will implement a new behaviour (e.g., be more physically active). We hypothesise that dyadic planning leads to higher increases in daily physical activity when compared to individual planning or no planning.
In the proposed randomised controlled trial, we will compare changes in daily moderate physical activity in N = 346 adults (primary outcome) and their partners who receive a general motivational treatment to enhance daily physical activity and are then randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: (a) a dyadic planning intervention, in which target persons form action plans to increase daily physical activity together with their partners, or (b) an individual planning intervention, in which target persons form such action plans individually and partners receive a distraction task, or (c) a no-planning control condition, in which target persons do not receive instructions for action planning, but perform a distraction task together with their partners. The study will entail an experimental longitudinal design with a baseline assessment (T0), an intervention session one week following baseline (T1) and follow-up assessments at 1 week (T2), 6 (T3; primary endpoint), 19 (T4), 26 (T6), and 52 (T7) weeks following the main intervention session. A booster intervention (T5) will take place 20 weeks after the main intervention session, i.e. 1 week following T4. Objective measurement of daily physical activity will include 4 one-week (T0, T2, T3, T7) accelerometer assessments. Additionally, further objective measurements of cardiorespiratory fitness, BMI, and waist-to-hip ratios along with self-report assessments from target persons and partners will be collected. Proposed mechanisms of the total intervention effect along with covariates will be assessed mostly via self-report.
Results of this study will contribute to the still limited understanding of the interplay of individual and dyadic regulation in the increase of daily physical activity and its maintenance, both in persons targeted by the intervention and in their partners. Findings will guide further development of this economical dyadic planning intervention that can be straightforwardly implemented in clinical settings to support the initiation and maintenance of preventive behaviour in couples. Furthermore, this theoretically-derived dyadic planning intervention can easily be extended to other domains of health-behaviour change.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dyadic planning intervention
A general motivational treatment is provided to each participant. For randomly assigned couples, randomly selected target persons form action plans to increase daily physical activity together with their partners.
Dyadic planning intervention
Dyadic planning refers to creating together with a partner if-then plans on when, where, and how the individual target person will implement a new behaviour.
General motivational treatment
Both partners are asked to read a brochure that aims at enhancing their motivation to increase levels of moderate physical activity. They respond to a quiz afterwards.
Individual planning intervention
A general motivational treatment is provided to each participant. For randomly assigned couples, target persons form action plans individually to increase daily physical activity and partners receive a distraction task.
Individual planning intervention
Target persons form action plans on their own.
General motivational treatment
Both partners are asked to read a brochure that aims at enhancing their motivation to increase levels of moderate physical activity. They respond to a quiz afterwards.
No-planning control condition
A general motivational treatment is provided to each participant. For randomly assigned couples, target persons do not receive instructions for action planning, but perform a distraction task together with their partners.
General motivational treatment
Both partners are asked to read a brochure that aims at enhancing their motivation to increase levels of moderate physical activity. They respond to a quiz afterwards.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dyadic planning intervention
Dyadic planning refers to creating together with a partner if-then plans on when, where, and how the individual target person will implement a new behaviour.
Individual planning intervention
Target persons form action plans on their own.
General motivational treatment
Both partners are asked to read a brochure that aims at enhancing their motivation to increase levels of moderate physical activity. They respond to a quiz afterwards.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Restrictions on being physically active as assessed by a risk-check form modelled after the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
* Being a competitive athlete and engaging in vigorous physical exercise for more than 3 hours per day
* Participating in other intervention programmes targeting physical activity or weight-loss
* Self-reported severe cardio-vascular or pulmonary disease, diseases or injury of the musculoskeletal system, degenerative neurological diseases, paraplegia
* Pregnancy
* A BMI below 17.5
* Insufficient comprehension of the German language
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V., Bonn (Germany)
OTHER
Freie Universität Berlin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nina Knoll
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Nina Knoll
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nina Knoll, Univ.-Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Freie Universität Berlin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Freie Universität Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Burkert S, Scholz U, Gralla O, Roigas J, Knoll N. Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: a randomized-controlled planning intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(5):783-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
Scholz U, Sniehotta FF, Burkert S, Schwarzer R. Increasing physical exercise levels: age-specific benefits of planning. J Aging Health. 2007 Oct;19(5):851-66. doi: 10.1177/0898264307305207.
Bernstein M, Sloutskis D, Kumanyika S, Sparti A, Schutz Y, Morabia A. Data-based approach for developing a physical activity frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Jan 15;147(2):147-54. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009427.
Mader U, Martin BW, Schutz Y, Marti B. Validity of four short physical activity questionnaires in middle-aged persons. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Jul;38(7):1255-66. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227310.18902.28.
Sniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: Planning, selfefficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & Health, 20, 143-160.
Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 716-732.
Lewis MA, Rook KS. Social control in personal relationships: impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychol. 1999 Jan;18(1):63-71. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.18.1.63.
Knoll N, Hohl DH, Keller J, Schuez N, Luszczynska A, Burkert S. Effects of dyadic planning on physical activity in couples: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;36(1):8-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000423. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
110014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.