IMaging PAtients for Cancer Drug selecTion - Metastatic Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01957332

Last Updated: 2024-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

217 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-30

Study Completion Date

2027-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current patient work-up, including conventional imaging and pathological assessment of just one single biopsy, might be insufficient to identify metastatic breast cancer patients, who possibly benefit from first-line anti-hormonal or anti-HER2 therapy. As receptor conversion of the tumor is found quite frequently and molecular heterogeneity can occur within one patient, up-to-date whole body information is necessary to determine estrogen receptor (ER) and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor status and subsequently guide therapy decision. With molecular imaging via PET this information can be obtained in a non-invasive, patient friendly way. Furthermore, to improve and individualize treatment and be able to identify (new) drug targets and biomarkers, sampling of venous blood, circulating tumor cells (CTC), as well as circulating tumor DNA, microRNA (miRNA) and molecular characterization of one metastasis at the beginning and, if feasible, of an additional biopsy during therapy, is necessary.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patient selection for hormone therapy and anti-HER2 therapy is based on the presence of their respective targets, the ER and HER2, as currently assessed on tumor tissue by molecular biological techniques. In primary breast cancer, both ER and HER2 are powerful predictors for response to ER or HER2 targeting treatment, driving treatment decisions. If both receptors are absent, targeted hormone or anti-HER2 therapy will not be administered and chemotherapy is the only therapeutic option left. MBC management in oncology practice is often based on ER and HER2 status of the primary tumor. However, a biopsy of a metastasis is considered part of the standard work up for MBC, in view of the potential conversion of ER and HER2 during the course of the disease. In contrast to primary breast cancer, no prospective studies have been done to evaluate the impact of (converted) receptor status on metastases, on prognosis and prediction of response to subsequent targeted therapy. Although receptor conversion in MBC is a well known phenomenon, clinicians may refrain from having a biopsy taken, for instance when it would require a highly invasive procedure. Even if it is feasible, the biopsy will only reflect ER and HER2 status of a single lesion, and disregard the potential heterogeneity of expression of ER and HER2 status between and within metastatic lesions.

Therefore, the current standard work up of MBC is not adequate enough or too invasive in a relevant proportion of MBC patients to drive treatment decisions. As a result, these patients incorrectly receive an ineffective treatment with potentially toxic effects. Meanwhile, an effective treatment for these patients may be delayed or even denied (such as chemotherapy or anti-HER2 based therapy) because of inadequate assessment of ER and HER2 status. This shows the need of obtaining up-to-date whole body information with information of characteristics of the different metastases within a patient. Non-invasive 18F-fluoroestradiol(18F-FES)-PET and Zirconium-89(89Zr)-trastuzumab-PET scan techniques are able to visualize the ER and HER2 in metastatic lesions throughout the whole body, and may therefore - in a patient friendly way- provide comprehensive information (i.e. of the primary tumor and various metastatic lesions) on ER and HER2 status. Furthermore, optimal selection of the right treatment for the right patient may not only reduce unnecessary toxicity, but also health care costs. Although various studies have already indicated the clinical utility of 18F-FES-PET and 89Zr-trastuzumab-PET, no prospective data are yet available assessing their predictive value (14-19). Therefore, it is clear that these new techniques, and also the aspects of cost-effectiveness, need to be prospectively evaluated within the framework of established assessments (including metastases biopsies and FDG-PET), to ensure their implementation in standard care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Molecular imaging

All patients receive 18F-FES (\~200MBq) injection followed by a FES-PET. On the same day or the day after 18F-FES injection 89Zr-trastuzumab (\~37 MBq) will be injected. The HER2-PET will be performed 4 days after tracerinjection.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Molecular imaging

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

On the day of FES-injection\&scan or the day after FES-injection, 89Zr-trastuzumab (\~37 MBq) will be injected. The HER2-PET will be performed 4 days after tracerinjection.

Molecular imaging

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients receive 18F-FES (\~200MBq) injection followed by a FES-PET.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Molecular imaging

On the day of FES-injection\&scan or the day after FES-injection, 89Zr-trastuzumab (\~37 MBq) will be injected. The HER2-PET will be performed 4 days after tracerinjection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Molecular imaging

All patients receive 18F-FES (\~200MBq) injection followed by a FES-PET.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HER2-PET Injection of 89Zr-trastuzumab followed by PET scan FES injection Injection of 18F-FES followed by PET scan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with first presentation of MBC, regardless of ER and HER2 status of the primary tumor, who is eligible for first-line systemic therapy.
* Patient with non-rapidly progressive MBC, not requiring urgent initiation of chemotherapy, based on clinician's evaluation which may include:

* no recent (\< 2 weeks prior to screening visit) significant worsening of MBC related signs and symptoms according to patient history.
* in case of liver metastases: no significant increase in liver function tests alanine aminotransferase aspartate transaminase (ASAT) and alanine transaminase (ALAT) in 2 weeks prior to screening visit. (Significant increase of liver function test is defined as 50% increase of absolute amount of ASAT/ALAT.)
* Patients in whom standard imaging work-up of MBC was recently (≤ 28 days) performed. Standard imaging must include: CT chest/abdomen, 18F-FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy.
* Patient with measurable or clinically evaluable (bone only) disease on recent standard work up of MBC are eligible.
* Metastatic lesion(s) of which a histological biopsy can safely be obtained according to standard clinical care procedures.
* Primary tumor blocks available for confirmatory central laboratory ER/HER2 testing in the UMCG. If available a snap frozen sample of the primary tumor will also be centralized in the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG).
* WHO performance status 0-2.
* Patient is able to undergo PET imaging procedures.
* Age \>18 years of age, willing and able to comply with the protocol as judged by the investigator.
* Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications for systemic treatment (as will be assigned based on biopsy and experimental scan results), either chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or anti-HER2 therapy, based on clinical judgment of treating medical oncologist and patient history.
* Pregnant or lactating women.
* Prior allergic reaction to immunoglobulins or immunoglobulin allergy.
* Inability to comply with study procedures.
* Rapidly progressive (visceral) disease requiring rapid initiation of chemotherapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Center Nijmegen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

C.P. Schroder

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carolien Schröder, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMCG

Willemien Menke, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VUMC

Winette vd Graaf, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

RUMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VU University Medical Center

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center St. Radboud

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boers J, Eisses B, Zwager MC, van Geel JJL, Bensch F, de Vries EFJ, Hospers GAP, Glaudemans AWJM, Brouwers AH, den Dekker MAM, Elias SG, Kuip EJM, van Herpen CML, Jager A, van der Veldt AAM, Oprea-Lager DE, de Vries EGE, van der Vegt B, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt WC, Schroder CP; IMPACT-Metastatic Breast Consortium. Correlation between Histopathological Prognostic Tumor Characteristics and [18F]FDG Uptake in Corresponding Metastases in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 14;14(4):416. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040416.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38396455 (View on PubMed)

van Geel JJL, Boers J, Elias SG, Glaudemans AWJM, de Vries EFJ, Hospers GAP, van Kruchten M, Kuip EJM, Jager A, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt WC, van der Vegt B, de Vries EGE, Schroder CP; IMPACT-Metastatic Breast Consortium. Clinical Validity of 16alpha-[18F]Fluoro-17beta-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Assess Estrogen Receptor Status in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3642-3652. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00400. Epub 2022 May 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35584346 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IMPACT MBC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

99mTc-ABH2 SPECT/CT in Breast Cancer
NCT06194565 RECRUITING NA