Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention: Clinician Led, Peer Led vs Web Delivered
NCT ID: NCT01949649
Last Updated: 2019-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
680 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-04-30
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Body Project Groups Led by Peers Versus Clinicians
NCT05993728
Eating Disorders Prevention: An Effectiveness Trial for At-Risk College Students
NCT01126918
Effectiveness of a Dissonance-Based Eating Disorder Prevention Program (The Body Project II)
NCT00663754
Eating Disorders Programs: An Indicated Trial
NCT03259347
Efficacy Trial of a Dissonance Based Eating Disorder Program
NCT03796091
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One solution to this key dissemination barrier is to train students in established peer leader programs at colleges to recruit high-risk students and deliver the program. Another solution to this dissemination barrier would be to deliver the Body Project via the Internet.
Because peer-led groups and Internet delivery of the Body Project could markedly extend the reach and sustainability of this evidence-based program, we propose to conduct the first large multi-site effectiveness trial that directly compares the effects and cost effectiveness of peer-led Body Project groups, the eBody Project intervention, and clinician-led Body Project groups to an educational video control condition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peer-Led Group Intervention
In the Peer-Led Group Intervention, participants voluntarily engage in verbal, written, and behavioral exercises in which they critique the thin-ideal ideal during 4 1-hr sessions and in homework activities which are led by peer leaders.
Peer-Led Group Intervention
Clinician-Led Group Intervention
In the Clinician-Led Group Intervention, participants voluntarily engage in verbal, written, and behavioral exercises in which they critique the thin-ideal ideal during 4 1-hr sessions and in homework activities which are led by University clinicians.
Clinician-Led Group Intervention
Internet-Based Intervention
The Internet-Based Intervention consists of 6 40-min modules involving user-driven self-education activities and games (e.g., role-plays), writing/video contests, and off-line exercises designed to induce dissonance regarding pursuit of the thin-ideal, mirroring activities from the group Body Project.
Internet-Based Intervention
Education Video
The Education Video describes eating disorders, their adverse effects, and the need for treatment, which is key information to provide to young women at elevated risk for eating disorders due to body dissatisfaction.
Education Video
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peer-Led Group Intervention
Internet-Based Intervention
Clinician-Led Group Intervention
Education Video
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Attend University of Oregon, Oregon State University, University of Texas at Austin, or Southwestern University
Exclusion Criteria
* Suicidal ideation
17 Years
22 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eric Stice, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oregon Research Institute
Corvallis, Oregon, United States
Oregon Research Institute
Eugene, Oregon, United States
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stice E, Rohde P, Gau J, Shaw H. An effectiveness trial of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk adolescent girls. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Oct;77(5):825-34. doi: 10.1037/a0016132.
Stice E, Rohde P, Shaw H, Gau J. An effectiveness trial of a selected dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for female high school students: Long-term effects. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Aug;79(4):500-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024351.
Stice E, Rohde P, Shaw H, Marti CN. Efficacy trial of a selective prevention program targeting both eating disorder symptoms and unhealthy weight gain among female college students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Feb;80(1):164-170. doi: 10.1037/a0026484. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
Stice E, Rohde P, Durant S, Shaw H. A preliminary trial of a prototype Internet dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for young women with body image concerns. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):907-16. doi: 10.1037/a0028016. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Hudson JI, Hiripi E, Pope HG Jr, Kessler RC. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Feb 1;61(3):348-58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
Stice E, Marti CN, Rohde P. Prevalence, incidence, impairment, and course of the proposed DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses in an 8-year prospective community study of young women. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 May;122(2):445-57. doi: 10.1037/a0030679. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
Wade TD, Bergin JL, Tiggemann M, Bulik CM, Fairburn CG. Prevalence and long-term course of lifetime eating disorders in an adult Australian twin cohort. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;40(2):121-8. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01758.x.
Fairburn CG, Harrison PJ. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2003 Feb 1;361(9355):407-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12378-1.
Crow SJ, Peterson CB, Swanson SA, Raymond NC, Specker S, Eckert ED, Mitchell JE. Increased mortality in bulimia nervosa and other eating disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1342-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020247. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
le Grange D, Binford RB, Peterson CB, Crow SJ, Crosby RD, Klein MH, Bardone-Cone AM, Joiner TE, Mitchell JE, Wonderlich SA. DSM-IV threshold versus subthreshold bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2006 Sep;39(6):462-7. doi: 10.1002/eat.20304.
Schmidt U, Lee S, Perkins S, Eisler I, Treasure J, Beecham J, Berelowitz M, Dodge L, Frost S, Jenkins M, Johnson-Sabine E, Keville S, Murphy R, Robinson P, Winn S, Yi I. Do adolescents with eating disorder not otherwise specified or full-syndrome bulimia nervosa differ in clinical severity, comorbidity, risk factors, treatment outcome or cost? Int J Eat Disord. 2008 Sep;41(6):498-504. doi: 10.1002/eat.20533.
Newman DL, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Magdol L, Silva PA, Stanton WR. Psychiatric disorder in a birth cohort of young adults: prevalence, comorbidity, clinical significance, and new case incidence from ages 11 to 21. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):552-62.
Striegel-Moore RH, Leslie D, Petrill SA, Garvin V, Rosenheck RA. One-year use and cost of inpatient and outpatient services among female and male patients with an eating disorder: evidence from a national database of health insurance claims. Int J Eat Disord. 2000 May;27(4):381-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(200005)27:43.0.co;2-u.
Stice E, Shaw H, Burton E, Wade E. Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: a randomized efficacy trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Apr;74(2):263-75. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.2.263.
Stice E, Desjardins C, Shaw H, Siegel S, Gee K, Rohde P. Prevalence, incidence, impairment, course, and diagnostic progression and transition of eating disorders, overweight, and obesity in a large prospective study of high-risk young women. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 May;134(4):427-437. doi: 10.1037/abn0000965. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
Stice E, Desjardins CD, Rohde P. Young women who develop anorexia nervosa exhibit a persistently low premorbid body weight on average: A longitudinal investigation of an important etiologic clue. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2022 Jul;131(5):479-492. doi: 10.1037/abn0000762. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Akers L, Rohde P, Shaw H, Stice E. Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Delivery Modalities for a Dissonance-Based Eating Disorder Prevention Program over 4-Year Follow-Up. Prev Sci. 2021 Nov;22(8):1086-1095. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01264-1. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
Stice E, Rohde P, Shaw H, Desjardins C. Weight suppression increases odds for future onset of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and purging disorder, but not binge eating disorder. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct 1;112(4):941-947. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa146.
Stice E, Rohde P, Shaw H, Gau JM. Clinician-led, peer-led, and internet-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Effectiveness of these delivery modalities through 4-year follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 May;88(5):481-494. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000493. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
Stice E, Rohde P, Shaw H, Gau JM. Clinician-led, peer-led, and internet-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Acute effectiveness of these delivery modalities. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Sep;85(9):883-895. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000211. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MH097720
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.