Trial Outcomes & Findings for Anal HPV Tests in Screening for Cell Changes in the Anus in Patients With HIV (NCT NCT01946139)

NCT ID: NCT01946139

Last Updated: 2023-11-07

Results Overview

Among patients who are HRA negative for HSIL, the number of participants who tested negative for HSIL on the APTIMA assay

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

276 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

at baseline

Results posted on

2023-11-07

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
Patients undergo screening for the detection of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) using anal cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Overall Study
STARTED
276
Overall Study
COMPLETED
256
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
20

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
Patients undergo screening for the detection of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) using anal cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
8
Overall Study
ineligible
8
Overall Study
Specimens not available
4

Baseline Characteristics

Anal HPV Tests in Screening for Cell Changes in the Anus in Patients With HIV

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=256 Participants
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
251 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
256 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
199 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
256 participants
n=5 Participants
Anal HSIL at baseline
69 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at baseline

Population: Participants who were negative for HSIL on the high resolution anoscopy at baseline and who had APTIMA assay results

Among patients who are HRA negative for HSIL, the number of participants who tested negative for HSIL on the APTIMA assay

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=175 Participants
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Specificity of Each Other Methods of HSIL Detection for APTIMA Assay
116 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at baseline

The prevalence of HSIL will be estimated as the proportion of women who are HRA positive for HSIL at entry and its 95% confidence interval. Logistic regression analysis will be used to evaluate the association of potential risk factors with diagnosis of HSIL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=256 Participants
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Prevalence of HSIL
69 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at baseline

Population: Patients whose HRA results were positive and had APTIMA results at baseline

Among patients whose high resolution anoscopy (HRA) results were positive for HSIL and had APTIMA assays at baseline, the number whose APTIMA assay results were positive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=68 Participants
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Sensitivity of Each of the Methods of APTIMA Assay at Baseline
50 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Population: Participants who did not have HSIL at baseline based on the high resolution anoscopy (HRA) results and who had follow-up HRA results

The Poisson rate and its 95% confidence interval will be estimated from the number of HSIL cases detected divided by the cumulative years of follow-up across these cases.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=143 Participants
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Incidence of HSIL Among Women Who Were HRA Negative for HSIL at Study Entry
9.08 events per 100 person-years
Interval 6.09 to 13.55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at baseline

Anal cancer screening is typically done using a high resolution anoscopy, a device which allows visualization of the anus. To determine if participants found anal screening acceptable, they were asked if they were at east with having a high resolution anoscopy. The results indicated the number of participants who felt at ease with having a high resolution anoscopy

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=256 Participants
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Acceptability of Anal Cancer Screening
137 Participants

Adverse Events

Screening (HSIL Detection)

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 17 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=256 participants at risk
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain - Cardiac
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Infections and infestations
Bone infection
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder, other
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Screening (HSIL Detection)
n=256 participants at risk
Patients undergo screening for the detection of HSIL using anal cytology, HPV hybrid capture 2, HPV mRNA assays, and OncoHealth HPVE6/E7 oncoprotein at baseline, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. comparison of screening methods: Undergo HPV screening using HC2, APTIMA and OncoHealth HPV E6/E7 assays laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
Eye disorders
Blurred vision
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Eye disorders
Eye disorders, other
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Eye disorders
Eye pain
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal hemorrhage
3.1%
8/256 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal pain
2.0%
5/256 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Gastrointestinal disorders
Fecal incontinence
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications, other
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions, other
0.78%
2/256 • 2 years
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgical and medical procedures, other
0.39%
1/256 • 2 years

Additional Information

Kimberly Mosby-Griffin

Emmes Company, LLC

Phone: 301 251-1161

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place