Romidepsin and Abraxane in Treating Patients With Metastatic Inflammatory Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01938833
Last Updated: 2025-05-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2016-12-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Abraxane and Lapatinib in Treating Patients With Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III Breast Cancer
NCT00331630
A Phase 2, 2-Stage, 2-Cohort Study of Talazoparib (BMN 673), in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With BRCA Mutation (ABRAZO Study)
NCT02034916
ABI-007 (Nab-Paclitaxel) and Gemcitabine in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00110084
Abemaciclib for Patients With Retinoblastoma-Positive, Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT03130439
Abexinostat, Palbociclib, and Fulvestrant for the Treatment of Breast or Gynecologic Cancer
NCT04498520
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. To assess the safety of the combination of romidepsin plus Abraxane (paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation) delivered weekly. (Phase I)
2. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of romidepsin with full dose weekly Abraxane to define a recommended phase II doses of the combination. (Phase I)
3. To assess the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, newly diagnosed metastatic inflammatory breast cancer treated with the combination of romidepsin and Abraxane. (Phase II)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
1. To assess the safety and tolerability of the combination of romidepsin and Abraxane.
2. To determine the adverse event profile of the combination of romidepsin and Abraxane.
3. To assess the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in patients with newly recurrent inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) treated with the combination of romidepsin and Abraxane.
OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of romidepsin followed by a phase II study.
Patients receive paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes and romidepsin IV over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment (Romidepsin and Abraxane)
Patients receive abraxane IV over 30 minutes and romidepsin IV over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Romidepsin
Abraxane
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Romidepsin
Abraxane
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients may have measurable disease, defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension in accordance with RECIST criteria v. 1.1 as described in detail in section 11.0 or non-measurable tumors
3. Patients must have demonstrated metastatic disease and not received \>2 lines of systemic therapy for metastatic disease
4. Age \> 18 years
5. ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
6. Patients must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below: a) Leukocytes \> 2,500/mcL b) Absolute neutrophil count \> 1,500/mcL c) Hemoglobin \> 9 g/dl d) Platelets \> 100,000/mcL e) Total bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dl f) AST/ALT (SGOT/SGPT) \< 2.5 x ULN g) Alkaline Phosphatase \< 2.5 x ULN (unless bone metastasis is present in the absence of liver metastasis, in which case 3.0 x ULN would be acceptable. h) Serum magnesium \> 1.8 mg/dL i) Serum creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dl j) Serum potassium \> 3.8 mmol/L
7. Tumor negative for HER2 expression (0 or 1+ by IHC) or negative FISH testing
8. Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
9. Patients must be recovered from the effects of any prior surgery, radiotherapy, or other antineoplastic therapy
10. Patients must have \< Grade 2 pre-existing peripheral neuropathy per CTCAE
11. Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males must use an effective contraception method during treatment and for three months after completing treatment
12. Negative serum or urine β-hCG pregnancy test at screening, performed no more than 72 hours prior to treatment initiation; for patients of childbearing potential
13. Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent and HIPAA consent document
11. Any cardiac arrhythmia requiring an anti-arrhythmic medication (excluding stable doses of beta-blockers)
12. Patients taking drugs leading to significant QT prolongation (See Appendix I: Medications That May Cause QTc Prolongation)
13. Concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors (see Appendix II)
8. Patients with known HIV, hepatitis B or C (However, if patients have previously been treated for hepatitis B or C and have undetectable viral loads, they can be considered eligible for trial)
9. Pregnant or breast feeding. Refer to section 4.4 for further detail
10. Patients with any other medical or psychological condition deemed by the investigator to be likely to interfere with a patient's ability to sign informed consent, cooperate and participate in the study, or interfere with the interpretation of the results
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents or active anti-neoplastic therapies
3. Patients who have previously received romidepsin or Abraxane
4. Patients with untreated or uncontrolled brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease
5. Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the components of romidepsin or who have had hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel
6. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
7. Any known cardiac abnormalities such as:
1. Congenital long QT syndrome
2. QTc interval ≥ 500 milliseconds
3. Myocardial infarction within 6 months of C1D1. Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction between 6 and 12 months prior to C1D1 who are asymptomatic and have had a negative cardiac risk assessment (treadmill stress test, nuclear medicine stress test, or stress echocardiogram) since the event may participate
4. Other significant EKG abnormalities including 2nd degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block type II, 3rd degree AV block, or bradycardia (ventricular rate less than 50 beats/min)
5. Symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD), e.g., angina Canadian Class II-IV (see Appendix III) In any patient in whom there is doubt, the patient should have a stress imaging study and, if abnormal, angiography to define whether or not CAD is present
6. An EKG recorded at screening showing evidence of cardiac ischemia (ST depression depression of ≥2 mm, measured from isoelectric line to the ST segment). If in any doubt, the patient should have a stress imaging study and, if abnormal, angiography to define whether or not CAD is present
7. Congestive heart failure (CHF) that meets New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV definitions (see Appendix IV) and/or known ejection fraction \<40% by MUGA or \<50% by echocardiogram and/orMRI
8. A known history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), Torsade de Pointes, or cardiac arrest unless currently addressed with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD)
9. Hypertrophic cardiomegaly or restrictive cardiomyopathy from prior treatment or other causes
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celgene Corporation
INDUSTRY
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maysa Abu-khalaf, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Jefferson University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blum JL, Savin MA, Edelman G, Pippen JE, Robert NJ, Geister BV, Kirby RL, Clawson A, O'Shaughnessy JA. Phase II study of weekly albumin-bound paclitaxel for patients with metastatic breast cancer heavily pretreated with taxanes. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007 Dec;7(11):850-6. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2007.n.049.
Chang H, Jeung HC, Jung JJ, Kim TS, Rha SY, Chung HC. Identification of genes associated with chemosensitivity to SAHA/taxane combination treatment in taxane-resistant breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jan;125(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0825-z. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
Chang H, Rha SY, Jeung HC, Jung JJ, Kim TS, Kwon HJ, Kim BS, Chung HC. Identification of genes related to a synergistic effect of taxane and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid combination treatment in gastric cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec;136(12):1901-13. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0849-0. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
Chang S, Parker SL, Pham T, Buzdar AU, Hursting SD. Inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program of the National Cancer Institute, 1975-1992. Cancer. 1998 Jun 15;82(12):2366-72.
Chen MY, Liao WS, Lu Z, Bornmann WG, Hennessey V, Washington MN, Rosner GL, Yu Y, Ahmed AA, Bast RC Jr. Decitabine and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) inhibit growth of ovarian cancer cell lines and xenografts while inducing expression of imprinted tumor suppressor genes, apoptosis, G2/M arrest, and autophagy. Cancer. 2011 Oct 1;117(19):4424-38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26073.
Cristofanilli M, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Update on the management of inflammatory breast cancer. Oncologist. 2003;8(2):141-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-2-141.
Colpaert CG, Vermeulen PB, Benoy I, Soubry A, van Roy F, van Beest P, Goovaerts G, Dirix LY, van Dam P, Fox SB, Harris AL, van Marck EA. Inflammatory breast cancer shows angiogenesis with high endothelial proliferation rate and strong E-cadherin expression. Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 10;88(5):718-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600807.
Desai N, Trieu V, Yao R, et al. Increased transport of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) by endothelial gp60-mediated caveolar transcytosis: a pathway inhibited by Taxol. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2004;2:182.
Gradishar WJ, Krasnojon D, Cheporov S, Makhson AN, Manikhas GM, Clawson A, Bhar P. Significantly longer progression-free survival with nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 1;27(22):3611-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5397. Epub 2009 May 26.
Kim H, Kim SN, Park YS, Kim NH, Han JW, Lee HY, Kim YK. HDAC inhibitors downregulate MRP2 expression in multidrug resistant cancer cells: implication for chemosensitization. Int J Oncol. 2011 Mar;38(3):807-12. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2010.879. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
Hoshino I, Matsubara H, Akutsu Y, Nishimori T, Yoneyama Y, Murakami K, Komatsu A, Sakata H, Matsushita K, Ochiai T. Gene expression profiling induced by histone deacetylase inhibitor, FK228, in human esophageal squamous cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2007 Sep;18(3):585-92.
Lassen U, Molife LR, Sorensen M, Engelholm SA, Vidal L, Sinha R, Penson RT, Buhl-Jensen P, Crowley E, Tjornelund J, Knoblauch P, de Bono JS. A phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat administered in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel in patients with solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2010 Jun 29;103(1):12-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605726. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
Low JA, Berman AW, Steinberg SM, Danforth DN, Lippman ME, Swain SM. Long-term follow-up for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer patients treated with multimodality therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Oct 15;22(20):4067-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.068.
Modesitt SC, Sill M, Hoffman JS, Bender DP; Gynecologic Oncology Group. A phase II study of vorinostat in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 May;109(2):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
Nguyen DM, Sam K, Tsimelzon A, Li X, Wong H, Mohsin S, Clark GM, Hilsenbeck SG, Elledge RM, Allred DC, O'Connell P, Chang JC. Molecular heterogeneity of inflammatory breast cancer: a hyperproliferative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 1;12(17):5047-54. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2248.
Nyman DW, Campbell KJ, Hersh E, Long K, Richardson K, Trieu V, Desai N, Hawkins MJ, Von Hoff DD. Phase I and pharmacokinetics trial of ABI-007, a novel nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):7785-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.6148.
Rasheed W, Bishton M, Johnstone RW, Prince HM. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in lymphoma and solid malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008 Mar;8(3):413-32. doi: 10.1586/14737140.8.3.413.
Robertson FM, Woodward WA, Pickei R, Ye Z, Bornmann W, Pal A, Peng Z, Hall CS, Cristofanilli M. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid blocks self-renewal and homotypic aggregation of inflammatory breast cancer spheroids. Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11 Suppl):2760-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25176.
Sasakawa Y, Naoe Y, Sogo N, Inoue T, Sasakawa T, Matsuo M, Manda T, Mutoh S. Marker genes to predict sensitivity to FK228, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005 Feb 15;69(4):603-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.11.008. Epub 2004 Dec 23.
ten Tije AJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Sparreboom A. Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(7):665-85. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342070-00005.
Ueda H, Nakajima H, Hori Y, Goto T, Okuhara M. Action of FR901228, a novel antitumor bicyclic depsipeptide produced by Chromobacterium violaceum no. 968, on Ha-ras transformed NIH3T3 cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1994 Sep;58(9):1579-83. doi: 10.1271/bbb.58.1579.
Van Laere S, Van der Auwera I, Van den Eynden GG, Fox SB, Bianchi F, Harris AL, van Dam P, Van Marck EA, Vermeulen PB, Dirix LY. Distinct molecular signature of inflammatory breast cancer by cDNA microarray analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Oct;93(3):237-46. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-5157-z.
Zou CF, Jia L, Jin H, Yao M, Zhao N, Huan J, Lu Z, Bast RC Jr, Feng Y, Yu Y. Re-expression of ARHI (DIRAS3) induces autophagy in breast cancer cells and enhances the inhibitory effect of paclitaxel. BMC Cancer. 2011 Jan 19;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-22.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-035
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
JT 2987
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
13C.387
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.