A Study of Ruxolitinib in Combination With Capecitabine in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02120417

Last Updated: 2018-02-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

149 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial comparing the overall survival of women with advanced or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer who received treatment with capecitabine in combination with ruxolitinib versus those who received treatment with capecitabine alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment A - Capecitabine and ruxolitinib

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ruxolitinib

Intervention Type DRUG

5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth

Ruxolitinib 15 mg BID (starting dose)

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine 2000 mg/m\^2 daily given as 1000 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID) (starting dose) Day 1-14 of each 21 day cycle

Treatment B - Capecitabine and placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine 2000 mg/m\^2 daily given as 1000 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID) (starting dose) Day 1-14 of each 21 day cycle

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

5 mg matching placebo tablets to be administered by mouth

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ruxolitinib

5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth

Ruxolitinib 15 mg BID (starting dose)

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine

Capecitabine 2000 mg/m\^2 daily given as 1000 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID) (starting dose) Day 1-14 of each 21 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

5 mg matching placebo tablets to be administered by mouth

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Jakafi ® Jakavi ®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed HER2-negative adenocarcinoma of the breast
* Locally advanced (Stage 3B) or metastatic (Stage 4) disease
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2
* Received up to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens (not including neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy) for advanced or metastatic disease
* Participants with hormone-receptor positive tumors must have failed available lines of hormonal therapy unless hormone therapy was not tolerated or not clinically appropriate
* ≥ 2 weeks elapsed from the completion of previous treatment regimen and must have recovered or be at a new stable baseline from any related toxicities
* Radiographically measurable or evaluable disease
* An mGPS of 1 or 2 as defined below:

* Criteria:

1. modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) of 1: CRP \> 10 mg/L and albumin ≥ 35 g/L
2. mGPS of 2: C-reactive protein (CRP) \> 10 mg/L and albumin \< 35 g/L

Exclusion Criteria

* Received prior treatment with capecitabine or fluoropyrimidine for advanced or metastatic disease
* Received more than 2 prior regimens for advanced or metastatic disease (not including hormonal therapy in the metastatic setting or neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies)
* Unknown hormone-receptor status
* Ongoing radiation therapy or radiation therapy administered within 2 weeks of enrollment
* Concurrent anticancer therapy
* Inadequate renal, hepatic or bone marrow function
* Another current or previous malignancy within 2 years of study entry unless approved by the sponsor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Incyte Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gerard Kennealey, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Incyte Corporation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sedona, Arizona, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Quincy, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Ames, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Grand Island, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Farmington, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middletown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Salem, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Alba, , Italy

Site Status

Fano, , Italy

Site Status

Foggia, , Italy

Site Status

Lecco, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Naples, , Italy

Site Status

Pontedera, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Saronno, , Italy

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Jaén, , Spain

Site Status

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kingston upon Thames, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Taunton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Truro, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Yeovil, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States France Italy Portugal Spain United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INCB 18424-268

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.