Rituximab Maintenance Therapy in Aggressive CD20 (Cluster of Differentiation Antigen 20) Positive Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01933711

Last Updated: 2016-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

328 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that the effect of rituximab could be improved by prolonged exposure to the drug. To test for this hypothesis we performed a prospective randomized trial of rituximab maintenance therapy versus observation in patients (pts) with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After completion of standard treatment, pts with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma were randomized to either observation or maintenance therapy with rituximab (375 mg/m2) administered every 3 months for 2 years. Both pts after first line therapy and pts after relapse treatment were included in the study. Pts with aggressive lymphoma were enrolled if they had achieved a complete response (CR) after initial treatment. Pts with aggressive lymphoma with residual tumor mass underwent positron emission tomography (PET) and qualified for randomization if this examination showed no signs of tumor activity. Pts with mantle cell lymphoma were eligible for the study if at least a partial response (PR) was achieved. Primary endpoint of the study was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and response to treatment. Differences between PFS and OS were analysed using the logrank test and the proportional hazard model of Cox. TTP was analyzed using a competing risk model with death as competing event.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CD20+ Aggressive Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rituximab maintenance

maintenance therapy with rituximab (375 mg/m2) administered every 3 months for 2 years.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Observation

observational arm, no intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aggressive B-cell lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma
* CR (complete remission) oder CRu (complete remission unconfirmed) after previous therapy
* PR (partial remission) only when PET is negative
* minimal age 18 years
* CD20+ expression on tumor cells
* effective contraception
* Karnofsky status \> 60
* written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Heidelberg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mathias Witzens-Harig

Priv.Doz Dr.med.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Heidelberg Hospital

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

University of Mannheim Hospital

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

University of Bonn Hospital

Bonn, Nordhein-Westfalen, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HD2002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Primary Rituximab and Maintenance
NCT00140582 COMPLETED PHASE3