Induction Chemotherapy (R-CHOP Vs. R-FC) Followed by Interferon Maintenance Versus Rituximab Maintenance in MCL

NCT ID: NCT00209209

Last Updated: 2017-03-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

570 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-01-14

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to answer the following independent questions in the treatment of mantle cell lymphomas:

* Can rituximab-fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (R-FC) improve the reduction of lymphoma mass compared to rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) and so become a new standard for initial cytoreductive therapy?
* Can maintenance with rituximab substitute the interferon maintenance and even improve the progression free survival in patients after successful initial cytoreductive therapy?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study investigates two independent questions in the treatment of elderly patients with mantle cell lymphomas:

1. To test in elderly patients with advanced mantle cell lymphoma, whether rituximab plus a combination of fludarabine with cyclophosphamide (6 FC cycles) results in a higher reduction of lymphoma mass measured by the percentage of CR than rituximab combined with the standard chemotherapy scheme (8 CHOP cycles).
2. To compare maintenance therapy with rituximab with maintenance with interferon-alpha or pegylated interferon for progression free survival, after 2 different regimens of induction chemo-immunotherapy in elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

This study will be performed as a prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter phase III trial. All patients will be randomized for an initial cytoreductive therapy with R-FC or R-CHOP.

The parameter for the comparison of R-FC and R-CHOP will be the percentage of complete remissions after initial cytoreductive therapy. According to the known results of R-FC and R-CHOP in lymphoma therapy, a relevant difference between R-CHOP and R-FC in the overall response rates is not expected. For both therapies an overall response rate of about 90% is expected. Since it is well known that the prognosis of patients who do not reach at least a PR in the initial therapy is very poor, it will be also necessary to control this parameter during the study. If an unexpected relevant difference in the overall response rates is observed during the study, the initial randomisation should be stopped and all patients should be assigned to the superior therapy. In this case the CR rates will not be important for the choice of the initial therapy. If no relevant differences in the overall response rates are observed, a one sided Fisher test will be performed at the end of the recruitment to test whether the rate of CR's after R-FC is significantly improved compared to R-CHOP.

The statistical parameters for controlling the overall response rates and for testing the CR rates are chosen in the following way: The working significance level for all statistical evaluations in this part of the study will be set to alpha=0.05. The expected CR rate after R-CHOP is according to the observations about 50%; a clinical relevant improvement by R-FC would be a CR rate of 65%. Such an improvement should be detected by the one sided Fisher test with a power of about 95%. According to these parameters about 246 observations for each treatment would be necessary. To control the overall response rates, a difference of 85% to 95% will be clinically so relevant that initial randomisation should be terminated with a probability of about 95%. Overall response rates will be controlled by a restricted sequential procedure.

Patients achieving at least a partial remission after R-FC or R-CHOP will be randomised for interferon maintenance versus rituximab maintenance in order to evaluate the impact of maintenance therapy in progression free survival.

The improvement expected by the new maintenance with rituximab for progression free survival can be expressed by reduction of relative risk (rr). Since a risk reduction to 60% was observed for indolent lymphomas by interferon maintenance, this seems to be a clinical relevant improvement for the new maintenance therapy. For a working significance level alpha=0.05 and a power of 95% the number of events (relapse or death) necessary for a two sided fixed sample trial is about 200. During this study the progression free survival in patients after successful initial therapy will be monitored by an equivalent restricted sequential procedure with a maximum number of 240 observation.

In order to evaluate the impact of initial therapy and maintenance therapy on overall survival in this patients, a total follow up of about 15 years for this study is expected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

1. randomisation: R-CHOP
2. randomisation: IFN maintenance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

antibody

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy

Vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

coricosteroide

Interferon-alpha

Intervention Type DRUG

cytokine

pegylated formula Interferon-alpha 2b

Intervention Type DRUG

cytokine

chemotherapy: R-CHOP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

immuno-chemotherapy

Interferon maintenance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

cytokine

2

1. randomisation: R-FC
2. randomisation: Rituximab maintnenance

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

antibody

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy

Fludarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy

chemotherapy: R-FC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

immuno-chemotherapy

Rituximab maintenance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

antibody

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rituximab

antibody

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Doxorubicin

chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Vincristine

chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

coricosteroide

Intervention Type DRUG

Fludarabine

chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Interferon-alpha

cytokine

Intervention Type DRUG

pegylated formula Interferon-alpha 2b

cytokine

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy: R-CHOP

immuno-chemotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

chemotherapy: R-FC

immuno-chemotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interferon maintenance

cytokine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Rituximab maintenance

antibody

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically proven mantle cell lymphoma according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, preferably confirmed by central pathology review before entering the study
* Clinical stage II, III or IV
* Previously untreated patients
* Above the age of 65 years and older or patients at the age between 60 and 65, if not eligible for high dose chemotherapy
* WHO performance grade 0, 1 or 2
* Informed consent according to International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use/European Union Good Clinical Practice (ICH/EU GCP) and national/local regulations
* Measurable disease. If, for example only bone marrow (BM) infiltration, patients can only undergo a second randomization if a CR is obtained.

Exclusion Criteria

* WHO performance of 3 or more
* Known anti-murine antibody (HAMA) reactivity or known hypersensitivity to murine antibodies
* Leukocytes \<2.0x 10\^9/l or thrombocytes \<100x 10\^9/l, unless clearly related to mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) bone marrow infiltration
* Patients previously treated for lymphoma
* Patients without measurable lesions; if, for example only bone marrow infiltration, patients may be included, but can only undergo a second randomization in case of a CR
* Patients with stage I disease
* Patients with central nervous system involvement
* Patients with a history of autoimmune hemolytic anaemia or autoimmune thrombocytopenia
* Patients with serious cardiac disease (uncontrolled arrhythmias, unstable angina, severe congestive heart failure)
* Patients with serious pulmonary, neurological, endocrinological or other disorder interfering with full dosing of CHOP or FC chemotherapy
* Liver enzymes \>3x normal or bilirubin \>2.5x normal (not due to lymphoma)
* Creatinine \>2x normal value, corrected for age and weight (not due to lymphoma)
* Patients with unresolved hepatitis B or C infection or known HIV positive infection
* Uncontrolled infection
* Patients with a serious depression that needed therapy within the last 5 years
* Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
* Concomitant or previous malignancies other than basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer and other cancer for which the patient has been disease-free for at least 5 years
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lymphoma Study Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

HOVON - Dutch Haemato-Oncology Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nordic Lymphoma Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. M. Dreyling (co-chairman)

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Groningen, Dept. of Hematology

Martin Dreyling, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital Grosshadern/LMU, Dept. of Medicine III

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

General University Hospital, 1St Department of Medicine

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Nordic Lymphoma Group

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Groupe D´Etudes des Lymphomes De l´Adulte (GELA)

Paris, , France

Site Status

German Low Grade Study Group (Glsg)

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Ospedale Ferratotto, Divisione Di Ematologia

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

HOVON - Dutch Haemato-Oncology Association (HOVON-Datacenter)

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

The Maria Sklodowska Memorial, Cancer Center - Inst. of Oncology

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia Denmark France Germany Italy Netherlands Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kluin-Nelemans HC, Hoster E, Hermine O, Walewski J, Trneny M, Geisler CH, Stilgenbauer S, Thieblemont C, Vehling-Kaiser U, Doorduijn JK, Coiffier B, Forstpointner R, Tilly H, Kanz L, Feugier P, Szymczyk M, Hallek M, Kremers S, Lepeu G, Sanhes L, Zijlstra JM, Bouabdallah R, Lugtenburg PJ, Macro M, Pfreundschuh M, Prochazka V, Di Raimondo F, Ribrag V, Uppenkamp M, Andre M, Klapper W, Hiddemann W, Unterhalt M, Dreyling MH. Treatment of older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):520-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200920.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22873532 (View on PubMed)

Hoster E, Delfau-Larue MH, Macintyre E, Jiang L, Stilgenbauer S, Vehling-Kaiser U, Salles G, Thieblemont C, Tilly H, Wirths S, Feugier P, Hubel K, Schmidt C, Ribrag V, Kluin-Nelemans JC, Dreyling M, Pott C; European MCL MRD Working Group and the European MCL Network. Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease for Efficacy of Rituximab Maintenance in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Elderly Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 10;42(5):538-549. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00899. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37992261 (View on PubMed)

Kluin-Nelemans HC, Hoster E, Hermine O, Walewski J, Geisler CH, Trneny M, Stilgenbauer S, Kaiser F, Doorduijn JK, Salles G, Szymczyk M, Tilly H, Kanz L, Schmidt C, Feugier P, Thieblemont C, Zijlstra JM, Ribrag V, Klapper W, Pott C, Unterhalt M, Dreyling MH. Treatment of Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized European MCL Elderly Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38(3):248-256. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01294. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31804876 (View on PubMed)

Hoster E, Klapper W, Hermine O, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Walewski J, van Hoof A, Trneny M, Geisler CH, Di Raimondo F, Szymczyk M, Stilgenbauer S, Thieblemont C, Hallek M, Forstpointner R, Pott C, Ribrag V, Doorduijn J, Hiddemann W, Dreyling MH, Unterhalt M. Confirmation of the mantle-cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index in randomized trials of the European Mantle-Cell Lymphoma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1338-46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2466. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24687837 (View on PubMed)

Pott C, Hoster E, Delfau-Larue MH, Beldjord K, Bottcher S, Asnafi V, Plonquet A, Siebert R, Callet-Bauchu E, Andersen N, van Dongen JJ, Klapper W, Berger F, Ribrag V, van Hoof AL, Trneny M, Walewski J, Dreger P, Unterhalt M, Hiddemann W, Kneba M, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Hermine O, Macintyre E, Dreyling M. Molecular remission is an independent predictor of clinical outcome in patients with mantle cell lymphoma after combined immunochemotherapy: a European MCL intergroup study. Blood. 2010 Apr 22;115(16):3215-23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-230250. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20032498 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.european-mcl.net

official webpage of the European MCLNetwork

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MCL2004-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Primary Rituximab and Maintenance
NCT00140582 COMPLETED PHASE3