A Prospective Study Comparing Two Reconstructive Operation Techniques After Myotomy of Achalasia
NCT ID: NCT01933373
Last Updated: 2013-09-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-05-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Toupet
Laparoscopic Myotomy + Toupet 180 degree partial posterior fundoplication.
Toupet
Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.
Dor
Laparoscopic Myotomy + Dor anterior partial fundoplication. 90 degree partial fundoplication being the standard of care.
Dor
Anterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Toupet
Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.
Dor
Anterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Typical achalasia according to manometry
* Eckhardt score \>3
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pseudo achalasia
* Inability to participate in follow-up
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ersta Hospital, Sweden
OTHER
Karolinska University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lars Lundell
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars R Lundell, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gastrocentrum Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kumagai K, Kjellin A, Tsai JA, Thorell A, Granqvist S, Lundell L, Hakanson B. Toupet versus Dor as a procedure to prevent reflux after cardiomyotomy for achalasia: results of a randomised clinical trial. Int J Surg. 2014;12(7):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.077. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007/595-32
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id