Assessment of Probe Based Confocal Laser Endo-microscopy for In-vivo Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Nodules and Masses.
NCT ID: NCT01931579
Last Updated: 2016-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective trial we will assess confocal endoscopy as a tool to localize the peripheral lung nodules and to differentiate benign from tumoral lesions.
Objective(s)
1. To demonstrate that confocal endo-microscopy is not inferior to navigational endoscopy for the localisation of peripheral lung nodule
2. To demonstrate that confocal endoscopy can differentiate benign from malignant tumors
Experimental design:
Multicentric prospective controlled trial, conducted in three academic centers, specialized in interventional bronchoscopy, equipped with both navigational bronchoscopy and probe based confocal endo-microscopy.
Subjects with peripheral lung nodule requiring navigational bronchoscopy will be explored using both Confocal endoscopy AND navigational bronchoscopy. Confocal probe will be inserted in the same catheter as used for the navigational bronchoscopy and confocal images will be recorded before sampling. An ancillary study using topical methylene blue as in situ will be conducted at the Rouen University Center.
An ancillary protocol includes the use of in situ methylene blue deposition and 660 confocal endo-microscopy analysis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Robotic-assisted Bronchoscopy Combined With the ICNVA Strategy in Biopsy of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules
NCT07136961
Diagnostic Efficiency Comparasion of Hand-Drawn Navigation and Virtual Navigation for Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules
NCT07053124
NEUWAVE Flexible Probe Study #2
NCT03713099
The Diagnostic Value of Bronchoscopic Needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) As a Real-time Detection Tool for Diagnosing Peripheral Lung Cancer: a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT06739421
Exploratory Trial of Navigational Bronchoscopy-Guided Cryoablation in Lung Cancer Treatment
NCT07301411
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. number of lesions localized by confocal endoscopy compared to navigational bronchoscopy
2. Positive and negative predictive values of confocal signs before and after IV fluorophore injection for the diagnosis of cancer.
In this this study, positive diagnostic criteria for the localization of peripheral nodule using confocal imaging is a solid pattern as opposed to the usual loose fibered network pattern of the normal alveolar duct. According to this criteria, the confocal imaging procedure will be considered as valid if the number of lesions localized by confocal is not inferior to 90 % of those localized by navigational bronchoscopy. Therefore, probe based confocal laser endo-microscopy will prove valid if it can recognize at least 70 subjects out of the 78 / 120 subjects for which the navigational bronchoscopy is forecasted to localize the peripheral lesion (Cohen concordance Kappa value of 0,74 between confocal and navigational bronchoscopy).
A secondary objective will be to describe specific signs of cancer using confocal endoscopy . This will be assessed on the first 30 patients using confocal imaging obtained before and after fluorophore IV injection, in comparison to histology, and confirmed on the following 48 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
confocal endo-microscopy
confocal endo-microscopy : CELLVIZIO endo-microscopy procedure is performed in every patient using the same extended working channel as for navigational bronchoscopy.
confocal endo-microscopy
The intervention consists of the use of confocal endo-microscopy using the CELLVIZIO device and either the 1 mm CELLVIZIO miniprobe (ALVEOFLEX) or the 0.6 mm CELLVIZIO miniprobe (CHOLANGIOFLEX), during a navigational bronchoscopy procedure for the diagnostic of peripheral nodule. In this study, the navigational device - either radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) or electromagnetic navigation (EMN) - will be moved to another location if the CELLVIZIO displays a non solid pattern, indicating that the nodule may not have been reached during the procedure. Three attempts of EBUS or EMN are allowed until the CELLVIZIO shows a solid pattern.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
confocal endo-microscopy
The intervention consists of the use of confocal endo-microscopy using the CELLVIZIO device and either the 1 mm CELLVIZIO miniprobe (ALVEOFLEX) or the 0.6 mm CELLVIZIO miniprobe (CHOLANGIOFLEX), during a navigational bronchoscopy procedure for the diagnostic of peripheral nodule. In this study, the navigational device - either radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) or electromagnetic navigation (EMN) - will be moved to another location if the CELLVIZIO displays a non solid pattern, indicating that the nodule may not have been reached during the procedure. Three attempts of EBUS or EMN are allowed until the CELLVIZIO shows a solid pattern.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years old or more.
* Affiliation to french social security insurance.
* Signed informed consent for the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncorrected bleeding disorders
* History of pneumonectomy or exploration controlateral to a non functional lung,
* Pregnant or breast feeding woman, or person not authorized to participate to a clinical trial according to L1121-6 et L1121-8 of French Code of Public Health, concurrent participation to another clinical trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Rouen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Luc C Thiberville, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Rouen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UHRouen
Rouen, , France
CHU Saint Etienne
Saint-Etienne, , France
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-AO1053-38
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2011/103/HP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.