Efficacy and Safety of IV Rigosertib in MDS Patients With Excess Blasts Progressing After Azacitidine or Decitabine

NCT ID: NCT01928537

Last Updated: 2020-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-06-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will examine the effect intravenously administered rigosertib has on the relationship between bone marrow blasts response and overall survival in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients who have 5-30% bone marrow blasts and who progressed on or after treatment with azacitidine or decitabine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes Refractory Anemia With Excess Blasts Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Cytopenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rigosertib sodium

Rigosertib sodium will be administered as a 72-hr continuous intravenous infusion consisting of 3 consecutive doses of 1800 mg over 24 hours on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 14-day cycle for the first 8 cycles and then on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 28-day cycle for the following cycles.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rigosertib sodium

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rigosertib sodium

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ON 01910.Na SyB L-1101

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of MDS confirmed within 6 weeks prior to Screening according to WHO criteria or French-American-British (FAB) classification.
* MDS classified as follows, according to WHO criteria and FAB classification:

* RAEB-1 (5% to 9% BM blasts)
* RAEB-2 (10% to 19% BM blasts)
* CMML (10% to 20% BM blasts) and white blood cells (WBC) \< 13,000/μL
* RAEB-t (20% to 30% BM blasts), meeting the following criteria: WBC \< 25,000/μL at study entry; or, Stable White Blood Cell (WBC) at least 4 weeks prior to Screening and not requiring intervention for WBC control with hydroxyurea, chemotherapy, or leukopheresis.
* At least one cytopenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \< 1800/μL or Platelet (PLT) count \< 100,000/μL or hemoglobin (Hgb) \< 10 g/dL).
* Progression (according to 2006 IWG criteria) at any time after initiation of subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine or decitabine treatment per labeling during the past 2 years, defined as follows:

* For patients with ˂ 5% BMBL, ≥ 50% increase in BMBL to ˃ 5% BMBL
* For patients with 5-10% BMBL, ≥ 50% increase in BMBL to ˃ 10% BMBL
* For patients with 10-20% BMBL, ≥ 50% increase in BMBL to ˃ 20% BMBL
* For patients with 20-30% BMBL, ≥ 50% increase in BMBL to ˃ 30% BMBL
* Any of the following: ≥ 50% decrease from maximum remission/response levels in granulocytes or PLT; Decrease in Hgb concentration by ≥ 2 g/dL; or, Transfusion dependence, defined as administration of at least 4 RBC units in the past 8 weeks before Screening (patients must have Hgb values ˂ 9 g/dL prior to transfusion to be considered), in the absence of another explanation.
* Has failed to respond to, relapsed following, not eligible, or opted not to participate in bone marrow transplantation.
* Off all other treatments for MDS for at least 4 weeks, except for azacitidine or decitabine. Filgrastim (G-CSF) and erythropoietin are allowed before and during the study as clinically indicated.
* No medical need for induction chemotherapy.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
* Willing to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol.
* Patient must signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous participation in a clinical study of IV or oral rigosertib.
* Anemia due to factors other than MDS (including hemolysis or gastrointestinal \[GI\] bleeding) unless stabilized for 1 week after RBC transfusion.
* Any active malignancy within the past year, except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast.
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including.
* Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy.
* Total bilirubin ≥ 1.5 mg/dL not related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease.
* ALT/AST ≥ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN).
* Serum creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dL.
* Ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis, or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of \<130 mEq/L).
* Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
* Patients who are unwilling to follow strict contraception requirements.
* Female patients with reproductive potential who do not have a negative urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (βHCG) pregnancy test at Screening.
* Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of Baseline/Cycle 1 Day 1 visit.
* Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as a systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or a diastolic pressure ≥ 110 mmHg).
* New onset seizures (within 3 months prior to Baseline) or poorly controlled seizures.
* Any other concurrent investigational agent or chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy.
* Prior treatment with low-dose cytarabine during the past 2 years.
* Investigational therapy within 4 weeks of Baseline/Day 1 visit.
* Psychiatric illness or social situation that would limit the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Traws Pharma, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven M. Fruchtman, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Traws Pharma, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University Cancer Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Cancer Center and Medical Pavilion

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Greenbaum Cancer Center University of Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center-Parkland Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Peter MacCallum Cancer Center

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Royal Melbourne Hospital

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Rigshospitalet, Department of Hematology

Copenhagen, Capital Region, Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, Jylland, Denmark

Site Status

Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service d'Hématologie

Paris, IDF, France

Site Status

Institute Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Goethe Universität

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Köln Klinik I für Innere Medizin

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Carl Guslav Carus

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Marien Hospital, Onkologie

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Technische Universität München, III. Medizinische Klinik

München, , Germany

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

AOU Maggiore della Carità, SCUD Ematologia

Novara, , Italy

Site Status

Policlinico Umberto 1, Universita "Sapienza"

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital Universitário de Salamanca

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Skåne University Hospital,

Lund, Skåne County, Sweden

Site Status

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenberg, Västra Götalandsregionen, Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Denmark France Germany Italy Spain Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Olnes MJ, Shenoy A, Weinstein B, Pfannes L, Loeliger K, Tucker Z, Tian X, Kwak M, Wilhelm F, Yong AS, Maric I, Maniar M, Scheinberg P, Groopman J, Young NS, Sloand EM. Directed therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by suppression of cyclin D1 with ON 01910.Na. Leuk Res. 2012 Aug;36(8):982-9. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22524974 (View on PubMed)

Seetharam M, Fan AC, Tran M, Xu L, Renschler JP, Felsher DW, Sridhar K, Wilhelm F, Greenberg PL. Treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients unresponsive to hypomethylating agents with ON 01910.Na. Leuk Res. 2012 Jan;36(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.08.022. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21924492 (View on PubMed)

Silverman LR, Greenberg P, Raza A, Olnes MJ, Holland JF, Reddy P, Maniar M, Wilhelm F. Clinical activity and safety of the dual pathway inhibitor rigosertib for higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes following DNA methyltransferase inhibitor therapy. Hematol Oncol. 2015 Jun;33(2):57-66. doi: 10.1002/hon.2137. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24777753 (View on PubMed)

Al-Kali A. Relationship of bone marrow blast (BMBL) response to overall survival (OS) in a multicenter study of rigosertib (Rigo) in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts progressing on or after treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017 35:15_suppl, 7056-7056 ASCO 2017

Reference Type RESULT

Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-001124-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Onconova 04-24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Luspatercept + Darbepoetin in MDS
NCT07096297 RECRUITING PHASE2