Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Event Free Survival With Iron Chelation Therapy Study
NCT ID: NCT00940602
Last Updated: 2020-11-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
225 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-22
2018-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Screening period:
The screening period lasting up to 35 days with two screening visits, at least 14 days apart, used to assess patient eligibility. Eligible patients with low or int-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with transfusional iron overload were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to deferasirox or placebo respectively. Randomization was also stratified using the International prognostic scoring system of low or int-1 MDS and by geographical region (Asian vs non-Asian countries) since the Asian population has been reported to have a longer survival.
The following concomitant medications could be permitted for use while the patient was on study, and information outlining start date(s) and end date(s) of each medication taken were to be recorded on the appropriate eCRF: Erythropoietin (growth factor), G-CSF (growth factor), GM-CSF growth factor), Azacitidine, Thalidomide, Arsenic trioxide, Lenalidomide, Decitabine, Cyclosporine A, Vitamin C supplements (≤ 200 mg/day)
Treatment period:
The dosing schedule was 10 mg/kg/day (once daily) for the first 2 weeks, followed by 20 mg/kg/day (once daily). After 3 months of treatment at the dose of 20mg/kg/day, the dose could be adjusted by 5 or 10 mg/kg/day up to 40 mg/kg/day based on the serum ferritin response. Placebo matching to each strength of the active deferasirox was utilized to maintain the double-blind trial design.
During the treatment period patients returned to the investigational site every four weeks for routine procedures and to monitor safety, efficacy and compliance to treatment.
An external Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) monitored patient safety and trial conduct and received a blinded summary of serious adverse events.
All suspected endpoint events were reviewed and adjudicated by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC) to ensure that all events that were reported were judged uniformly using the same criteria. The first confirmed suspected endpoint event for a patient was counted for the trial's composite primary endpoint, "event free survival". The composite primary endpoint, "event free survival," was defined for a patient as the date randomized to trial treatment to the date of the first documented non-fatal event, related to cardiac and liver function, transformation to AML, or death due to any cause.
When a patient had a non-fatal event, related to cardiac and liver function, and transformation to AML, the trial treatment (deferasirox or placebo) was discontinued. After trial treatment was discontinued, a 28 days post treatment safety assessment for AEs and SAEs was completed. Any patient who died during the treatment or 28 day post treatment safety assessment is represented in the all-cause mortality table in the safety section of this result. After trial treatment was discontinued for a patient, their treatment was un-blinded. Subsequent iron chelation treatment was subject to the patient's and investigator's decision. Patients continued to be followed during the post-treatment evaluation or survival follow up period, depending on their choice.
For patients who did not meet a non-fatal event, study treatment was continued as long as the patient and the treating physician felt it was in the best interest for the patient or until the trial terminated/completed. There was no un-blinding of the trial treatment for patients who terminated trial treatment without meeting a non-fatal event. Patients continued to be followed during the post-treatment evaluation or survival follow up period, depending on their choice.
A patient who discontinued study treatment without meeting a non-fatal component of the composite primary endpoint continued to be evaluated every 3 months. Once a patient stopped study evaluations they were followed for at least every 6 months for overall survival and any iron chelation therapies they are receiving up to the end of study.
Post-treatment evaluation period:
For patients who had a non-fatal event: After treatment termination, all patients were followed for safety (28 days) and then evaluated with visits every three months if they agreed to move into the post treatment evaluation phase.
For patients who did not meet a non-fatal event: After termination of study treatment, if a patient and investigator chose the post-treatment evaluation period, the patient was followed for safety and endpoints at visits occurring every three months.
Survival Follow Up period:
Subsequent to the post treatment evaluation period, or at the end of treatment period, if a patient and treating physician decided that the patient would not participate in the post treatment evaluation period, the patient was followed every 6 months for overall survival and iron chelation therapies.
The end of the study was defined as three years from the date the last patient was enrolled (last patient first visit).
The sample size of 210 patients did not provide sufficient power for testing statistical hypotheses. The statistical analysis was revised accordingly to concentrate on evaluating the treatment effect of deferasirox relative to placebo, and the study phase designation was changed from Phase lll to Phase II. Amendment 4 of the study adjusted the sample size, statistical analysis, and duration of the study and added two secondary endpoints: Hematologic improvement (HI) in terms of erythroid response and Frequency and rate of infections requiring intravenous (IV) antimicrobials. Upon approval of the amendment, patients signed a new consent form and continued the appropriate visit schedule.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Deferasirox
10 mg/kg/day (once daily) for the first 2 weeks of treatment, followed by 20 mg/kg/day (once daily) from Week 2 to End of Treatment. After 3 months of treatment at 20 mg/kg/day, the dose was allowed to be adjusted by 5 or 10 mg/kg/day up to 40 mg/kg/day based on serum ferritin responses. When a target serum ferritin level was reached (usually between 500 and 1000 µg/L), the dose could be reduced by 50% to maintain the serum ferritin within the target range.
Deferasirox
Deferasirox provided as 125 mg, 250 mg, and 500 mg dispersible tablets for oral use
Placebo
10 mg/kg/day (once daily) for the first 2 weeks of treatment, followed by 20 mg/kg/day (once daily) from Week 2 to End of Treatment. After 3 months of treatment at 20 mg/kg/day, the dose was allowed to be adjusted by 5 or 10 mg/kg/day up to 40 mg/kg/day based on serum ferritin responses. When a target serum ferritin level was reached (usually between 500 and 1000 µg/L), the dose could be reduced by 50% to maintain the serum ferritin within the target range.
Placebo
Inactive ingredients used as a placebo comparator, provided as 125 mg, 250 mg, and 500 mg dispersible tablets for oral use
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Deferasirox
Deferasirox provided as 125 mg, 250 mg, and 500 mg dispersible tablets for oral use
Placebo
Inactive ingredients used as a placebo comparator, provided as 125 mg, 250 mg, and 500 mg dispersible tablets for oral use
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Low or int-1 risk MDS
* Ferritin \>1000 micrograms/liter at screening
* History of transfusion of 15 to 75 Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) units
* Anticipated to be transfused with at least 8 units of PRBCs annually during the study
* Women of child-bearing potential using effective methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* More than 3 years since patient began receiving regular transfusions (2 units per 8 weeks or 4 units received in a 3 month period)
* Significant proteinuria
* History of hospitalization for congestive heart failure; other heart conditions as specified in the protocol
* Systemic diseases which would prevent study treatment
* Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV
* Liver cirrhosis
* Pregnant, or breast-feeding patients, or patients of child-bearing potential not employing an effective method of birth control
* History of drug or alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to enrollment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc. PAC Center
Anaheim, California, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers RMCC
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
Willis-Knighton Cancer Center Dept of Onc
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Henry Ford Hospital Henry Ford
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Midwest Cancer Care Physicians MMCC
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Mercy Medical Research Institute SC
Manchester, Missouri, United States
Glacier View Research Institute - Cancer SC
Kalispell, Montana, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center Department of Research
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Dept of MD Anderson (16)
Houston, Texas, United States
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas HOAST CCC of So.TX- MedicalCenter(2)
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Swedish Cancer Institute Ballard Campus
Seattle, Washington, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Herston, Queensland, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Plovdiv, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Varna, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Jinan, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Herlev, , Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, GR, Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Ioannina, GR, Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Pátrai, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Novartis Investigative Site
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, BO, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Cagliari, CA, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, FI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Messina, ME, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Pescara, PE, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Reggio Calabria, RC, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Orbassano, TO, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuala Selangor, , Malaysia
Novartis Investigative Site
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Auckland, , New Zealand
Novartis Investigative Site
Auckland, , New Zealand
Novartis Investigative Site
Christchurch, , New Zealand
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Rostov-on-Don, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Basel, , Switzerland
Novartis Investigative Site
Zurich, , Switzerland
Novartis Investigative Site
Khon Kaen, THA, Thailand
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, , Thailand
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, , Thailand
Novartis Investigative Site
Chiang Mai, , Thailand
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Bournemouth, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Exeter, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Kent, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Macclesfield, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Nottingham, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Angelucci E, Li J, Greenberg P, Wu D, Hou M, Montano Figueroa EH, Rodriguez MG, Dong X, Ghosh J, Izquierdo M, Garcia-Manero G; TELESTO Study Investigators. Iron Chelation in Transfusion-Dependent Patients With Low- to Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 21;172(8):513-522. doi: 10.7326/M19-0916. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-012418-38
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CICL670A2302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id