Advanced Cardiac Imaging in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
NCT ID: NCT01927614
Last Updated: 2024-08-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
5 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-10-13
2015-07-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this pilot study, we aim to demonstrate the feasibility of cardiac CT and cardiac MRI with and without perfusion protocols, in patients post-heart transplant and to describe and compare CT and MRI findings in patients with established CAV versus those with no CAV, as diagnosed by standard invasive methods.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Severe CAV MRI in Heart Transplant Recipient
NCT02777255
Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy With Optical Coherence Tomography
NCT01527344
MARINER Trial: Multiparametric Cardiac PET for CAV Surveillance After Heart Transplantation
NCT06089486
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) for Detection of Cardiac Transplant Rejection
NCT01136135
Comparison of Coronary CT With IVUS in Heart Transplant Population
NCT00589524
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Coronary angiography and assessment of heart function remain the cornerstone for diagnosis of CAV. The main limitation of angiography is its inability to identify mild or early disease, as an apparently normal angiogram can underestimate the presence of CAV. Intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS) at coronary angiography has been evaluted as an adjunctive mordality for assessing and diagnosing early CAV. Certain IVUS parameters have been correlated with high risk for development of CAV and overall worse prognosis long term.
Detection of CAV has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Once detected by angiography, the likelihood of progression to severe CAV within 5 years is 19%. The overall likelihood of death or re-transplantation as a result of CAV is approximately 50% for severe CAV. Changes are made to medical therapy targeted at slowing or halting CAV progression and patients are evaluated for re-transplantation sooner rather than later, depending on the rate of progression.
Currently, CAV is diagnosed by cardiac catheterization performed at routine intervals post transplant, with or without the use of IVUS. This is an invasive test with complications including bleeding, vascular damage, renal failure, stroke, heart attack or death. It has low sensitivity for identifying early CAV. Recent advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and cardiac CT imaging (CCT) present a unique opportunity to investigate these non-invasive modalities in CAV. To date, there are no studies in this field.
We propose to evaluate whether functional CCT and/or CMR perfusion abnormalities, calcium scoring by CCT, and late gadolinium enhancement by CMR, is feasible in heart transplant patients and whether these modalities can detect abnormalities that correlate to cardiac catheterization results and detect early CAV before it becomes angiographically apparent. This pilot study will be the first of its kind in the heart transplant population. We aim to demonstrate feasibility and safety of CCT/CMR in heart transplant patients and correlate specific CMR/CCT abnormalities to established angiographic apparent CAV. This will allow further prospective evaluation of this exciting non-invasive modality in CAV detection with larger research studies by our group.
The clinical implications are significant in that we may reduce the number of invasive procedures performed and identify CAV earlier, leading to the institution of earlier therapies, such as proliferation signal inhibitors, that may alter the natural history of this disease in effort to prolong the life of the transplanted heart.
Specific Objectives:
Primary Objectives:
1. The number of patients with adverse events from CCT and CMR
2. Determine recruitment rates for future studies, logistics of testing, and the ability to perform the tests
Secondary Objectives:
1. Describe the CCT and CMR imaging findings in CAV
1. Identify and describe structural and functional CMR abnormalities in established angiographically apparent CAV using novel imaging protocols, including stress-rest perfusion imaging.
2. Identify and describe structural and functional cardiac CT abnormalities in established angiographically apparent CAV using novel imaging protocols, including stress-rest perfusion imaging.
2. Correlation between intimal thickening by IVUS imaging at cardiac catheterization and CCT/CMR perfusion abnormalities at one year post heart transplant.
3. Correlation between CCT/CMR perfusion abnormalities at one year post heart transplant with the development of angiographically apparent CAV, graft dysfunction, cardiac adverse events, and overall survival long term, and compare CCT to CMR in this regard (Cohort 1 \& 2 below)
Study Design: Patients will be recruited into 1 of 3 cohorts from the heart transplant program at the QE II Health Science Center, Halifax Infirmary site, using a protocol approved by the institutional research ethics board. Eligible patients are those scheduled for routine invasive coronary angiography, \> 18 years of age, \> 12 months post-transplant and be able to undergo both CCT and CMR. Exclusion criteria include a creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated \< 45ml/min, contraindications or inability to administer intravenous beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers and standard contraindications to CMR, contrast media, and adenosine. Patients will be identified by Dr. Brian Clarke who is involved the care of all heart transplant patients at the QE II Health Science Centre
Data will be analyzed as follows:
1. Feasibility will be determined based on successful rate of recruitment and completion of CCT/CMR scans in cohort 3.
2. Patients eligible for cohort 3 require the diagnosis of CAV 1 at any time point post-transplant. The attending transplant cardiologist involved makes this assessment. More advanced CAV is excluded. These patients will be analyzed without a comparator group. For CCT, calcium scoring, intimal thickening, and perfusion abnormalities will be described and analyzed for their correlation to angiographic findings. CMR imaging will describe late gadolinium enhancement, structural changes, and perfusion abnormalities and be analyzed for their correlation to angiographic findings. In a separate analysis, these patients will also be compared with those in cohort 2 to determine the non-invasive imaging differences between CAV1 and CAV0 patients.
3. Cohort 1 will be analyzed separately; comparing those with MIT \<0.5mm to those with MIT \> 0.5mm for differences in CCT/CMR imaging and perfusion abnormalities. CCT will be compared with CMR in both MIT subgroups. We anticipate to identify perfusion abnormalities in the MIT \> 0.5mm group and no perfusion abnormalities in the MIT \< 0.5mm. Patients in cohort 1 will be followed long term for the development of angiographically apparent CAV, adverse cardiac events, graft dysfunction, and death.
Results will be reported mainly in a descriptive manner, so that data will be summarized in percentage, mean or median, where applicable.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort 1
20 patients 1-year post heart transplant will undergo standard of care invasive cardiac catheterization but will also have intravascular ultrasound performed to measure the maximal intimal thickness of the proximal left anterior descending artery. Patients will be dichotomized into those with MIT \<0.5mm (10 patients) and those with MIT \>0.5mm (10 patients). All 20 patients will undergo both cardiac CT and cardiac MRI with perfusion imaging.
Cardiac CT
A 128-slice dual-source CT system will be used (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Germany).
The CT scan protocol will comprise 3 steps.
1. Prospectively gated calcium scoring.
2. Stress-myocardial CT perfusion.
3. Rest Coronary CT angiography and myocardial CT perfusion. Automated computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose- length-product (DLP) will be collected from the scanner, and effective dose will be calculated using the DLP conversion factor (0.014) for each component of the cardiac CT protocol. Based on local dose audits the predicted dose range will be 3.5 mSv to 8 mSv depending on patient body habitus.
Cohort 2
10 patients 1 year post heart transplant classified as CAV grade 0 by standard cardiac catheterization will undergo both cardiac CT and cardiac MRI with perfusion imaging.
Cardiac CT
A 128-slice dual-source CT system will be used (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Germany).
The CT scan protocol will comprise 3 steps.
1. Prospectively gated calcium scoring.
2. Stress-myocardial CT perfusion.
3. Rest Coronary CT angiography and myocardial CT perfusion. Automated computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose- length-product (DLP) will be collected from the scanner, and effective dose will be calculated using the DLP conversion factor (0.014) for each component of the cardiac CT protocol. Based on local dose audits the predicted dose range will be 3.5 mSv to 8 mSv depending on patient body habitus.
Cohort 3
10 patients with a diagnosis of CAV grade 1 as assessed by routine coronary angiogram at any time point post heart transplantation, will undergo cardiac CT and cardiac MRI with perfusion imaging
Cardiac CT
A 128-slice dual-source CT system will be used (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Germany).
The CT scan protocol will comprise 3 steps.
1. Prospectively gated calcium scoring.
2. Stress-myocardial CT perfusion.
3. Rest Coronary CT angiography and myocardial CT perfusion. Automated computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose- length-product (DLP) will be collected from the scanner, and effective dose will be calculated using the DLP conversion factor (0.014) for each component of the cardiac CT protocol. Based on local dose audits the predicted dose range will be 3.5 mSv to 8 mSv depending on patient body habitus.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cardiac CT
A 128-slice dual-source CT system will be used (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Germany).
The CT scan protocol will comprise 3 steps.
1. Prospectively gated calcium scoring.
2. Stress-myocardial CT perfusion.
3. Rest Coronary CT angiography and myocardial CT perfusion. Automated computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose- length-product (DLP) will be collected from the scanner, and effective dose will be calculated using the DLP conversion factor (0.014) for each component of the cardiac CT protocol. Based on local dose audits the predicted dose range will be 3.5 mSv to 8 mSv depending on patient body habitus.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Greater than or equal to 12 months post transplant
* Able to undergo cardiac CT and cardiac MRI
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe aortic stenosis
* Long-QT syndrome (corrected QT \>440ms)
* AV block grade II/III
* Sick sinus syndrome
* New York Heart Association heart failure class III/IV
* Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* Asthma
* Atrial fibrillation
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%
* Presence of a pacemaker or ICD
* Presence of any metal in body
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nova Scotia Health Authority
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian Clarke, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Staff Cardiologist and Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of Cardiology, QE II Health Science Centre, Dalhousie University and Capital District Health Authority
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDHA_CAV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.