Using Implementation Intentions to Increase Safe Sex Practices in MSM

NCT ID: NCT01926418

Last Updated: 2013-08-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the utility of the Theory of Planned Behavior in predicting condom use among men who have sex with men. It also aims to assess the utility of two interventions, one known as "implementation intentions", the other involves the practice of a planning task known as "the tower of Hanoi", in increasing condom use in this population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is two-fold. The first part of the study aims to assess the validity of a theory of health behaviour, known as the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) in predicting condom use in and Australian sample of men who have sex with men (MSM). The TPB states that a person's intention to use condoms is the best predictor of their actual condom use behaviour. The TPB indicates that intention is predicted by an individual's attitude towards condom use, whether they believe their family and friends feel that they should use condoms (known as "subjective norm"), and how much control the person feels that they have over condom use (known as perceived behavioral control). In order to measure this, participants will be asked to complete questions regarding their attitudes, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, intention towards condom use, and actual condom use behavior. It is expected that the TPB will be successful in predicting condom use in this population.

The second part of the study aims to assess whether two different interventions are effective in increasing condom use among men who have sex with men (MSM).

The first intervention is known as "implementation intentions" and asks that participants specify when, where and how they might increase their condom use in the future (e.g. by buying condoms). It is predicted that in making this plan that the likelihood of preparing to use condoms will increase as will actual condom use.

The second intervention asks participants to practice a task several times per week that is thought to improve planning ability. The task is known as "The Tower of Hanoi" which is a computer based program that requires participants to shift discs across three different pegs in and ordered and planned way. It is thought that this practice can improve an individual's planning ability. It is thought that this planning ability may then generalise to other tasks such as planning to use condoms. It is predicted that this intervention will increase actual condom use among this population.

A control group that receives no intervention will also be employed.

Measures of the TPB will be taken at baseline and three months after the interventions have taken place to assess any changes to the variables thought to predict condom use, and any changes in condom use behavior. It is expected that the the TPB variables will all increase in the intervention groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Sex

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

HIV Condoms Men who have sex with men implementation intentions executive function

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

The control group receives the TPB questionnaires but receives no intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Implementation intentions

Participants are asked to specify when, where and how they will use condoms in the future. They will be sent weekly email reminders of their implementation intentions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Planning tasks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Implementation intentions: Participants are asked to specify when, where and how they plan to use condoms in the future.

Executive function training aims to improve planning ability and therefore aims to increase condom use planning.

Planning task

Participants will be asked to practice the Tower of Hanoi task four times per week for ten to fifteen minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Planning tasks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Implementation intentions: Participants are asked to specify when, where and how they plan to use condoms in the future.

Executive function training aims to improve planning ability and therefore aims to increase condom use planning.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Planning tasks

Implementation intentions: Participants are asked to specify when, where and how they plan to use condoms in the future.

Executive function training aims to improve planning ability and therefore aims to increase condom use planning.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

implementation intentions executive function training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men who have sex with men
* Adults (over 18 years old)
* Sexually active

Exclusion Criteria

* Women
* Minors (under 18 years old)
* Those who have never been sexually active
* Those unable to provide consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Albion Centre - South Eastern Sydney Local Health District

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sydney

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ben Andrew

Mr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Barbara Mullan, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sydney

Benjamin J. Andrew, DCP/Msc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sydney

John de Wit, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Center in HIV Social Research

Kim Begley, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Albion Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Albion Center

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Benjamin J. Andrew, DCP/MSc

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +61 414416906

Email: [email protected]

Barbara Mullan, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +61 2 9351 6811

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

USydney

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id