Syncope Patient Evaluation in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT01916070

Last Updated: 2013-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

397 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with the symptom complex syncope or near-syncope are quite often in the emergency department. Most patients with syncope have a positive prognosis. However some types of syncope are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. It is a challenge to detect these patients reliably at an early stage. The current guidelines contain exact definitions concerning the characteristics of patients with syncope and recommendations on how to diagnose and treat these patients following standardized pathways. Due to the fact that near-syncope is poorly defined and therefore seldom evaluated in clinical trials, data concerning near-syncope are rare.

Our aim was to characterize patients presenting with syncope or near-syncope to the emergency department regarding their risk profile, comorbidities and prognosis. First we evaluated if there is a difference between the two groups syncope and near-syncope concerning type and frequency of adverse events. Furthermore we analyzed the routinely measured cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and hs cTnT in patients with syncope or near-syncope. Then we determined both their prognostic accuracy in predicting adverse events and their diagnostic accuracy in finding the underlying etiology. Finally we analyzed a special patient collective, patients aged ≥ 65 years. It is assumed that elderly patients are suffering from comorbidities and age-related physiological and cognitive disabilities. We therefore hypothesize that elderly patients, in contrast to patients aged \< 60, display an increased risk of adverse events and that they have a poorer prognosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

(Near) Syncope

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

syncope near syncope prognosis emergency department

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

patients with syncope

No interventions assigned to this group

patients with near syncope

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (near) syncope

Exclusion Criteria

* age \< 18 years
* progressive impairment of consciousness
* use of mind-altering drugs
* non syncopal loss of consciousness: hyperventilation, hypoglycaemia, metabolic disorders, psychogenic pseudosyncope, TIA or stroke, seizure, transient loss of consciousness caused by craniocerebral injury
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Klinikum Nürnberg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. Michael Christ

Prof. Dr. med. Michael Christ

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Christ, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinikum Nürnberg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum Nuremberg

Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPEED01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id