Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department Evaluation of Syncope

NCT ID: NCT01671371

Last Updated: 2016-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether point-of-care (bedside) ultrasound assists physicians in the evaluation and management of patients with syncope.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Syncope is one of the more common presentations to the Emergency Department, representing between 1.2-1.5% of all evaluated patients and up to 6% of admissions. Due to an often broad and overlapping differential diagnosis, syncope represents a disease entity that often requires extensive workup. This typically involves laboratory tests, EKGs, x-rays, computed tomography, or other studies that are costly, time-consuming, and, in the case of diagnostic imaging, frequently involves ionizing radiation. Yet, despite extensive testing, an exact diagnosis is not made in up to 50% of cases.

Cardiac causes of syncope include myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion, volume depletion, arrhythmia, among other entities, many of which are life threatening. Echocardiography (cardiac ultrasound) has been used for inpatient syncope evaluations for several decades. In the Emergency Department, echocardiography is currently being used at the point-of-care (POC) in a limited and focused approach to a variety of conditions. However, POC ultrasound has never been systematically evaluated as a diagnostic or prognostic tool specifically for syncope in the Emergency Department. We aim to determine if an ultrasound-based protocol is effective as an adjunct in the evaluation of syncope. Our research study will examine the utility of POC ultrasound in the diagnosis, imaging and laboratory utilization, and prognosis of syncope in the Emergency Department.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Syncope

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate Ultrasound

A point-of-care ultrasound will be performed during the initial evaluation of the patient after randomization (Defined as Time 0)

Group Type OTHER

Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Performance of a focused cardiac ultrasound including a qualitative assessment of left ventricular function, pericardial effusion, right ventricular strain, proximal ascending aortic diameter, and inferior vena cava size and collapsibility

Delayed Ultrasound

A point-of-care ultrasound will be performed by the provider at 60 min after initial randomization

Group Type OTHER

Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Performance of a focused cardiac ultrasound including a qualitative assessment of left ventricular function, pericardial effusion, right ventricular strain, proximal ascending aortic diameter, and inferior vena cava size and collapsibility

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Performance of a focused cardiac ultrasound including a qualitative assessment of left ventricular function, pericardial effusion, right ventricular strain, proximal ascending aortic diameter, and inferior vena cava size and collapsibility

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years and older presenting to the ED with acute syncope (defined as transient loss of consciousness) or near syncope (sensation of impending but not actual loss of consciousness) as a reason for ED visit.

Exclusion Criteria

* persistent altered mental status
* alcohol or illicit drug-related loss of consciousness
* definite seizure, and transient loss of consciousness caused by head trauma.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard A Taylor, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Keller C, Tristano JM, De Lorenzo R, et al.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Grossman SA, Fischer C, Lipsitz LA, Mottley L, Sands K, Thompson S, Zimetbaum P, Shapiro NI. Predicting adverse outcomes in syncope. J Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;33(3):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17976548 (View on PubMed)

Dhatreecharan S, Azar P, Werner MS, et al.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gabayan GZ, Derose SF, Asch SM, Chiu VY, Glenn SC, Mangione CM, Sun BC. Predictors of short-term (seven-day) cardiac outcomes after emergency department visit for syncope. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jan 1;105(1):82-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.654.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20102895 (View on PubMed)

Martin NM, Picard MH. Use and appropriateness of transthoracic echocardiography in an academic medical center: a pilot observational study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Jan;22(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19022620 (View on PubMed)

Christopher L Moore and Joshua A Copel.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1110009227

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gastric US in ICU Patient
NCT05526105 RECRUITING NA