Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
702 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2018-09-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective of the protocol is to compare the % of eyes that have lost at least 5 letters of visual acuity at 2 years compared with baseline mean visual acuity in eyes with central-involved DME and good visual acuity defined as a Snellen equivalent of 20/25 or better (electronic-ETDRS letter score of 79 or better) that receive (1) prompt focal/grid photocoagulation + deferred anti-VEGF, (2) observation + deferred anti-VEGF, or (3) prompt anti-VEGF.
Secondary objectives include:
* Comparing other visual acuity outcomes between treatment groups, such as the percent of eyes with at least 5, 10 and 15 letter losses in visual acuity from baseline mean visual acuity, percent of eyes with at least 5 letter gain in visual acuity from baseline, mean visual acuity, mean change in visual acuity, adjusted for baseline mean visual acuity
* For eyes randomized to deferred anti-VEGF, the percentage of eyes needing anti-VEGF treatment
* Comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes, such as the mean change in OCT central subfield (CSF) thickness, adjusted for baseline mean thickness
* Comparing the number of eyes with PDR at randomization, proportion of eyes avoiding vitreous hemorrhage or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or vitrectomy for PDR between treatment groups
* Comparing safety outcomes between treatment groups
* Comparing associated treatment and follow-up exam costs between treatment groups
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT01627249
A 12-month, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab vs Laser in Chinese Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Patients
NCT02259088
Ranibizumab in Residual Diabetic Macular Edema Following Previous Anti-VEGF Therapy
NCT01472510
Ranibizumab and Peripheral Scatter Laser in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema and Peripheral Nonperfusion
NCT00815360
The Effect of Intravitreal Ranibizumab on Visual Acuity and Hard Exudate Resolution in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Center Involved Edema and Lipid Exudates
NCT02448446
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prompt Laser + Deferred Aflibercept
Focal/grid laser followed by intravitreal aflibercept if vision worsens
Prompt Laser
Focal/grid laser performed at baseline and as needed during follow-up
Deferred aflibercept
Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed once certain criteria for vision loss are met and then up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria
Observation + Deferred Aflibercept
No treatment to start followed by intravitreal aflibercept if vision worsens (deferred laser may be added to intravitreal aflibercept if certain criteria are met)
Deferred laser
Focal/grid laser is initiated while receiving anti-VEGF injections only if certain criteria are met
Deferred aflibercept
Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed once certain criteria for vision loss are met and then up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria
Prompt Aflibercept
Intravitreal aflibercept at baseline and every 4 weeks as needed (deferred laser may be added to intravitreal aflibercept if certain criteria are met)
Prompt aflibercept
Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed on the day of randomization and up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria
Deferred laser
Focal/grid laser is initiated while receiving anti-VEGF injections only if certain criteria are met
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prompt Laser
Focal/grid laser performed at baseline and as needed during follow-up
Prompt aflibercept
Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed on the day of randomization and up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria
Deferred laser
Focal/grid laser is initiated while receiving anti-VEGF injections only if certain criteria are met
Deferred aflibercept
Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed once certain criteria for vision loss are met and then up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
1. Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes
2. Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
3. Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association (ADA) and/or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
3. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
Meets all of the following ocular criteria in at least the one eye:
1. Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥ 79 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/25 or better) at two consecutive visits within 1 to 28 days.
2. On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME involving the center of the macula.
3. Diabetic macular edema confirmed on OCT (equivalent to CSF thickness on OCT ≥250 microns on Zeiss Stratus or gender-specific spectral domain OCT equivalent) at two consecutive visits within 1 to 28 days.
(a) Investigator must verify accuracy of OCT scan by ensuring it is centered and of adequate quality.
4. The investigator is comfortable with the eye being randomized to any of the three treatment groups (observation, laser, or anti-VEGF initially).
(a) If focal/grid photocoagulation is contraindicated because all leaking microaneurysms are too close to the fovea or the investigator believes the DME that is present will not benefit from focal/grid photocoagulation, the eye should not be enrolled.
5. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and individual cooperation sufficient for adequate OCT and fundus photographs.
Exclusion Criteria
2. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
3. Initiation of intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) within 4 months prior to randomization or plans to do so in the next 4 months.
4. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied.
(a) Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.
5. Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
6. Blood pressure \>180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.
7. Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization.
These drugs should not be used during the study.
8. For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 24 months.
(a) Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
9. Individual is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 24 months of the study.
Individual has any of the following ocular characteristics:
1. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than DME.
a) An eye should not be considered eligible if: (1) the macular edema is considered to be related to ocular surgery such as cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or OCT suggest that vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) are contributing to the macular edema.
2. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, any visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
3. An ocular condition is present (other than DME) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.).
4. Cataract is present that, in the opinion of the investigator, may alter visual acuity during the course of the study.
5. Any history of prior laser or other surgical, intravitreal, or peribulbar treatment for DME (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids, or anti-VEGF).
6. History of topical steroid or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) treatment within 30 days prior to randomization.
7. History of intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroid within 4 months prior to randomization for an ocular condition other than DME.
8. Any history of or anticipated need for intravitreal anti-VEGF within the next 6 months for an ocular condition other than DME (e.g. choroidal neovascularization, central retinal vein occlusion, PDR).
9. History of PRP within 4 months prior to randomization or anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization.
10. Any history of vitrectomy.
11. History of major ocular surgery (cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
12. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
13. Aphakia.
14. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carl Baker, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Paducah Retina Center
Adam Glassman, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Arizona Retina and Vitreous Consultants
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of Arizona Medical Center/Department of Ophthalmology
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Retinal Diagnostic Center
Campbell, California, United States
Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
Loma Linda, California, United States
South Coast Retina Center
Long Beach, California, United States
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
Palm Desert, California, United States
Retina Consultants of Southern California
Redlands, California, United States
Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc.
Sacramento, California, United States
California Retina Consultants
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Bay Area Retina Associates
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.
Westlake Village, California, United States
Retina Group of New England
New London, Connecticut, United States
New England Retina Associates
Norwich, Connecticut, United States
National Ophthalmic Research Institute
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
University of Florida College of Med., Department of Ophthalmology
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Florida Retina Consultants
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Retina Macula Specialists of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Ocala Eye Retina Consultants
Ocala, Florida, United States
Magruder Eye Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States
Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute
Plantation, Florida, United States
Center for Sight
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Sarasota Retina Institute
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.
Tampa, Florida, United States
Emory Eye Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Marietta Eye Clinic
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Thomas Eye Group
Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Glenview, Illinois, United States
Illinois Retina Associates
Joliet, Illinois, United States
University Retina and Macula Associates
Oak Forest, Illinois, United States
Carle Foundation Hospital
Urbana, Illinois, United States
Raj Maturi
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
New Albany, Indiana, United States
Medical Associates Clinic, P.C.
Dubuque, Iowa, United States
Wolfe Eye Clinic
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology
Prairie Village, Kansas, United States
Retina Associates, P.A.
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States
Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Paducah Retinal Center
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Elman Retina Group, P.A.
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Vitreo-Retinal Associates, PC
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Retina Vitreous Center
Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States
Retina Specialists of Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Vitreo-Retinal Associates
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Andersen Eye Associates
Saginaw, Michigan, United States
Retina Center, PA
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Mid-America Retina Consultants, P.A.
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
The Retina Institute
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS)
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Retinal and Ophthalmic Consultants, PC
Northfield, New Jersey, United States
Eye Associates of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Ross Eye Institute, SUNY Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, United States
The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
New York, New York, United States
MaculaCare
New York, New York, United States
Retina Associates of Western New York
Rochester, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
Syracuse, New York, United States
Western Carolina Retinal Associates, PA
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
Beachwood, Ohio, United States
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Retina Vitreous Center
Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Retina, LLP
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Retina Northwest, PC
Portland, Oregon, United States
Casey Eye Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States
Family Eye Group
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Retina Vitreous Consultants
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Carolina Retina Center
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Palmetto Retina Center
West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Southwest Retina Specialists
Amarillo, Texas, United States
Austin Retina Associates
Austin, Texas, United States
Retina Research Center
Austin, Texas, United States
Retina and Vitreous of Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
Baylor Eye Physicians and Surgeons
Houston, Texas, United States
Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
Houston, Texas, United States
Texas Retina Associates
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Valley Retina Institute
McAllen, Texas, United States
Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Retina Associates of Utah, P.C.
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Retina Institute of Virginia
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Virginia Commonwealth University, Dept. of Ophthalmology
Richmond, Virginia, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Spokane Eye Clinic
Spokane, Washington, United States
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept of Ophthalmology/Retina Service
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Alberta Retina Consultants
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
UBC/VCHA Eye Care Centre
Vancouver, , Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Glassman AR, Baker CW, Beaulieu WT, Bressler NM, Punjabi OS, Stockdale CR, Wykoff CC, Jampol LM, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Assessment of the DRCR Retina Network Approach to Management With Initial Observation for Eyes With Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Visual Acuity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;138(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6035.
Baker CW, Glassman AR, Beaulieu WT, Antoszyk AN, Browning DJ, Chalam KV, Grover S, Jampol LM, Jhaveri CD, Melia M, Stockdale CR, Martin DF, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 May 21;321(19):1880-1894. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5790.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EY14231
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EY23207
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EY18817
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DRCR.net Protocol V
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.