Treatment for CI-DME in Eyes With Very Good VA Study

NCT ID: NCT01909791

Last Updated: 2020-07-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

702 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-09-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although multiple studies have clearly demonstrated that ranibizumab therapy is more effective than laser alone for vision gain and avoiding vision loss in patients with central-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), only eyes with poor visual acuity, such as a visual acuity letter score of 78 or worse (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 or worse) were eligible. Eyes that have central-involved DME with "good" visual acuity (20/25 or better) have not been addressed systematically by recent studies for treatment of DME. Baseline cohort characteristics from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) suggest that a substantial percentage of eyes with central-involved DME may retain good vision. The investigators do not know definitively whether eyes with central-involved DME and good vision do better with anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) (e.g. aflibercept) therapy initially, or focal/grid laser treatment or observation initially followed by anti-VEGF only if vision worsens.

The primary objective of the protocol is to compare the % of eyes that have lost at least 5 letters of visual acuity at 2 years compared with baseline mean visual acuity in eyes with central-involved DME and good visual acuity defined as a Snellen equivalent of 20/25 or better (electronic-ETDRS letter score of 79 or better) that receive (1) prompt focal/grid photocoagulation + deferred anti-VEGF, (2) observation + deferred anti-VEGF, or (3) prompt anti-VEGF.

Secondary objectives include:

* Comparing other visual acuity outcomes between treatment groups, such as the percent of eyes with at least 5, 10 and 15 letter losses in visual acuity from baseline mean visual acuity, percent of eyes with at least 5 letter gain in visual acuity from baseline, mean visual acuity, mean change in visual acuity, adjusted for baseline mean visual acuity
* For eyes randomized to deferred anti-VEGF, the percentage of eyes needing anti-VEGF treatment
* Comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes, such as the mean change in OCT central subfield (CSF) thickness, adjusted for baseline mean thickness
* Comparing the number of eyes with PDR at randomization, proportion of eyes avoiding vitreous hemorrhage or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or vitrectomy for PDR between treatment groups
* Comparing safety outcomes between treatment groups
* Comparing associated treatment and follow-up exam costs between treatment groups

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prompt Laser + Deferred Aflibercept

Focal/grid laser followed by intravitreal aflibercept if vision worsens

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prompt Laser

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Focal/grid laser performed at baseline and as needed during follow-up

Deferred aflibercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed once certain criteria for vision loss are met and then up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria

Observation + Deferred Aflibercept

No treatment to start followed by intravitreal aflibercept if vision worsens (deferred laser may be added to intravitreal aflibercept if certain criteria are met)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Deferred laser

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Focal/grid laser is initiated while receiving anti-VEGF injections only if certain criteria are met

Deferred aflibercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed once certain criteria for vision loss are met and then up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria

Prompt Aflibercept

Intravitreal aflibercept at baseline and every 4 weeks as needed (deferred laser may be added to intravitreal aflibercept if certain criteria are met)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prompt aflibercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed on the day of randomization and up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria

Deferred laser

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Focal/grid laser is initiated while receiving anti-VEGF injections only if certain criteria are met

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prompt Laser

Focal/grid laser performed at baseline and as needed during follow-up

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Prompt aflibercept

Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed on the day of randomization and up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria

Intervention Type DRUG

Deferred laser

Focal/grid laser is initiated while receiving anti-VEGF injections only if certain criteria are met

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Deferred aflibercept

Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg aflibercept performed once certain criteria for vision loss are met and then up to every 4 weeks using defined treatment criteria

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

focal/grid photocoagulation laser treatment intravitreal anti-VEGF Eylea focal/grid photocoagulation laser treatment intravitreal anti-VEGF Eylea

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \>= 18 years
2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)

Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
1. Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes
2. Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
3. Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association (ADA) and/or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
3. Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Meets all of the following ocular criteria in at least the one eye:

1. Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥ 79 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/25 or better) at two consecutive visits within 1 to 28 days.
2. On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME involving the center of the macula.
3. Diabetic macular edema confirmed on OCT (equivalent to CSF thickness on OCT ≥250 microns on Zeiss Stratus or gender-specific spectral domain OCT equivalent) at two consecutive visits within 1 to 28 days.

(a) Investigator must verify accuracy of OCT scan by ensuring it is centered and of adequate quality.
4. The investigator is comfortable with the eye being randomized to any of the three treatment groups (observation, laser, or anti-VEGF initially).

(a) If focal/grid photocoagulation is contraindicated because all leaking microaneurysms are too close to the fovea or the investigator believes the DME that is present will not benefit from focal/grid photocoagulation, the eye should not be enrolled.
5. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and individual cooperation sufficient for adequate OCT and fundus photographs.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.
2. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
3. Initiation of intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) within 4 months prior to randomization or plans to do so in the next 4 months.
4. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied.

(a) Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.
5. Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
6. Blood pressure \>180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.
7. Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization.

These drugs should not be used during the study.
8. For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 24 months.

(a) Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
9. Individual is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 24 months of the study.

Individual has any of the following ocular characteristics:

1. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than DME.

a) An eye should not be considered eligible if: (1) the macular edema is considered to be related to ocular surgery such as cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or OCT suggest that vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) are contributing to the macular edema.
2. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, any visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
3. An ocular condition is present (other than DME) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.).
4. Cataract is present that, in the opinion of the investigator, may alter visual acuity during the course of the study.
5. Any history of prior laser or other surgical, intravitreal, or peribulbar treatment for DME (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids, or anti-VEGF).
6. History of topical steroid or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) treatment within 30 days prior to randomization.
7. History of intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroid within 4 months prior to randomization for an ocular condition other than DME.
8. Any history of or anticipated need for intravitreal anti-VEGF within the next 6 months for an ocular condition other than DME (e.g. choroidal neovascularization, central retinal vein occlusion, PDR).
9. History of PRP within 4 months prior to randomization or anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization.
10. Any history of vitrectomy.
11. History of major ocular surgery (cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
12. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
13. Aphakia.
14. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jaeb Center for Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carl Baker, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Paducah Retina Center

Adam Glassman, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jaeb Center for Health Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arizona Retina and Vitreous Consultants

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of Arizona Medical Center/Department of Ophthalmology

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Retinal Diagnostic Center

Campbell, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

South Coast Retina Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC

Palm Desert, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Southern California

Redlands, California, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc.

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

California Retina Consultants

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Bay Area Retina Associates

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Group of New England

New London, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

New England Retina Associates

Norwich, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

National Ophthalmic Research Institute

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Florida College of Med., Department of Ophthalmology

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Retina Consultants

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Retina Macula Specialists of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala Eye Retina Consultants

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Magruder Eye Institute

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Center for Sight

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota Retina Institute

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory Eye Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Southeast Retina Center, P.C.

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta Eye Clinic

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Thomas Eye Group

Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

NorthShore University HealthSystem

Glenview, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Illinois Retina Associates

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University Retina and Macula Associates

Oak Forest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carle Foundation Hospital

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Raj Maturi

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

John-Kenyon American Eye Institute

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Medical Associates Clinic, P.C.

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Wolfe Eye Clinic

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Medical Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology

Prairie Village, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates, P.A.

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Paducah Retinal Center

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Elman Retina Group, P.A.

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Joslin Diabetes Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Vitreo-Retinal Associates, PC

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Retina Vitreous Center

Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Retina Specialists of Michigan

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Vitreo-Retinal Associates

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Andersen Eye Associates

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Retina Center, PA

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mid-America Retina Consultants, P.A.

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

The Retina Institute

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA

Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS)

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Retinal and Ophthalmic Consultants, PC

Northfield, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Eye Associates of New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Ross Eye Institute, SUNY Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

MaculaCare

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Western New York

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Western Carolina Retinal Associates, PA

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Retina Vitreous Center

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oregon Retina, LLP

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Retina Northwest, PC

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Casey Eye Institute

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Family Eye Group

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Retina Vitreous Consultants

Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Carolina Retina Center

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Palmetto Retina Center

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Retina Associates

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Retina Associates, PC

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southwest Retina Specialists

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin Retina Associates

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Research Center

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina and Vitreous of Texas

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor Eye Physicians and Surgeons

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Houston, PA

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Retina Associates

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Valley Retina Institute

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants of San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Utah, P.C.

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Retina Institute of Virginia

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Commonwealth University, Dept. of Ophthalmology

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane Eye Clinic

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept of Ophthalmology/Retina Service

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Alberta Retina Consultants

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

UBC/VCHA Eye Care Centre

Vancouver, , Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Glassman AR, Baker CW, Beaulieu WT, Bressler NM, Punjabi OS, Stockdale CR, Wykoff CC, Jampol LM, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Assessment of the DRCR Retina Network Approach to Management With Initial Observation for Eyes With Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Visual Acuity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;138(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6035.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32077907 (View on PubMed)

Baker CW, Glassman AR, Beaulieu WT, Antoszyk AN, Browning DJ, Chalam KV, Grover S, Jampol LM, Jhaveri CD, Melia M, Stockdale CR, Martin DF, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 May 21;321(19):1880-1894. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5790.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31037289 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EY14231

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EY23207

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EY18817

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DRCR.net Protocol V

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.