Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT ID: NCT01627249
Last Updated: 2020-08-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
660 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2019-04-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Because of its availability and lower cost, bevacizumab is already currently in widespread clinical use for treatment of DME despite the lack of FDA approval for this indication. Thus, a clinical trial that suggested whether bevacizumab could be used as a safe and efficacious alternative to ranibizumab could substantially impact nationwide practice patterns for treatment of DME by either validating the current use of bevacizumab or by demonstrating improved outcomes with ranibizumab or aflibercept treatment for DME.
Study Objective The primary objective of the proposed research is to compare the efficacy and safety of (1) intravitreal aflibercept, (2) intravitreal bevacizumab, and (3) intravitreal ranibizumab when given to treat central-involved DME in eyes with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Systemic VEGF Protein Dynamics Following Intravitreal Injections of Ranibizumab Versus Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT02258009
Intravitreal Ranibizumab or Aflibercept After Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT04018833
To Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Ranibizumab in People With Vision Loss Due to Macular Edema
NCT01846299
A Study Evaluating Dosing Regimens for Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injections in Subjects With Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion
NCT01277302
Ranibizumab for Recalcitrant Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration in Eyes Previously Switched From Bevacizumab and/or Ranibizumab to Aflibercept.
NCT01972763
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ranibizumab
0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab
Intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg ranibizumab (Lucentis™) at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
Aflibercept
2.0 mg intravitreal aflibercept
Intravitreal injection of 2.0 mg aflibercept at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
Bevacizumab
1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab
Intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
2.0 mg intravitreal aflibercept
Intravitreal injection of 2.0 mg aflibercept at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab
Intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab
Intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg ranibizumab (Lucentis™) at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Individuals \<18 years old are not being included because DME is so rare in this age group that the diagnosis of DME may be questionable.
* Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
* Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
* Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes
* Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
* Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or World Health Organization criteria (see Procedures Manual for definitions)
* At least one eye meets the following study eye criteria:
* Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity letter score ≤ 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and ≥ 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within eight days of randomization.
* On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula.
* Diabetic macular edema present on optical coherence tomography (OCT) (central subfield thickness on OCT \>250 µm on Zeiss Stratus or the equivalent on spectral domain OCTs based on gender specific cutoffs), within eight days of randomization.
* Investigator must verify accuracy of OCT scan by ensuring it is centered and of adequate quality (for Zeiss Stratus, standard deviation of center point thickness should be ≤ 10% of the center point thickness and signal strength should be ≥ 6)
* Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and individual cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs
* Able and willing to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
•Individuals in poor glycemic control who, within the last four months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next four months should not be enrolled.
* Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied at the time of study entry.
• Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.
* Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
* Blood pressure \> 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110).
• If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.
* Myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization.
* Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within four months prior to randomization or anticipated use during the study.
• These drugs cannot be used during the study.
* For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 24 months.
* Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
* Individual is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the first 12 months of the study.
The following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the nonstudy eye):
* Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
* An eye should not be considered eligible if: (1) the macular edema is considered to be related to ocular surgery such as cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or OCT suggest that vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) are the primary cause of the macular edema.
* An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
* An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.).
* Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by three lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
* History of an anti-VEGF treatment for DME in the past 12 months or history of any other treatment for DME at any time in the past four months (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids).
* Enrollment will be limited to a maximum of 25% of the planned sample size with any history of anti-VEGF treatment for DME. Once this number of eyes has been enrolled, any history of anti-VEGF treatment for DME will be an exclusion criterion.
* History of pan-retinal photocoagulation within four months prior to randomization or anticipated need for pan-retinal photocoagulation in the six months following randomization.
* History of anti-VEGF treatment for a disease other than DME in the past 12 months.
* History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior four months or anticipated within the next six months following randomization.
* History of YAG capsulotomy performed within two months prior to randomization.
* Aphakia.
* Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Genentech, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John A Wells, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Palmetto Retina Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Retina Associates
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
Loma Linda, California, United States
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
Palm Desert, California, United States
California Retina Consultants
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Bay Area Retina Associates
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.
Westlake Village, California, United States
New England Retina Associates
Norwich, Connecticut, United States
Gulf Coast Retina Center
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Retina Group of Florida
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
National Ophthalmic Research Institute
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Central Florida Retina Institute
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Ocala Eye Retina Consultants
Ocala, Florida, United States
Magruder Eye Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States
Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute
Plantation, Florida, United States
Sarasota Retina Institute
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.
Tampa, Florida, United States
Emory Eye Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Georgia Retina, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Thomas Eye Group
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Glenview, Illinois, United States
Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
New Albany, Indiana, United States
Medical Associates Clinic, P.C.
Dubuque, Iowa, United States
Wolfe Eye Clinic
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Retina Associates, P.A.
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States
Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Paducah Retinal Center
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Elman Retina Group, P.A.
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Vitreo-Retinal Associates, PC
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Retina Vitrous Center
Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States
Retina Specialists of Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Vitreo-Retinal Associates
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Retina Center, PA
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Barnes Retina Institute
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS)
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Eye Associates of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
New York, New York, United States
MaculaCare
New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Dept. of Ophthalmology
New York, New York, United States
Retina Associates of Western New York
Rochester, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
Syracuse, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Western Carolina Retinal Associates, PA
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University Eye Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
Beachwood, Ohio, United States
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Retina Vitreous Center
Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Retina Northwest, PC
Portland, Oregon, United States
Casey Eye Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States
Family Eye Group
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Retina Vitrous Consultants
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Palmetto Retina Center
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Carolina Retina Center
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Southwest Retina Specialists
Amarillo, Texas, United States
Austin Retina Associates
Austin, Texas, United States
Retina Research Center
Austin, Texas, United States
Retina and Vitreous of Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
Baylor Eye Physicians and Surgeons
Houston, Texas, United States
Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
Houston, Texas, United States
Texas Retina Associates
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Valley Retina Institute
McAllen, Texas, United States
Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Retina Associates of Utah, P.C.
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Virginia Retina Center
Leesburg, Virginia, United States
Retina Institute of Virginia
Richmond, Virginia, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Spokane Eye Clinic
Spokane, Washington, United States
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept of Ophthalmology/Retina Service
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Medical College of Wiconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jampol LM, Glassman AR, Liu D, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, Duh EJ, Quaggin S, Wells JA, Wykoff CC; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Plasma Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Concentrations after Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology. 2018 Jul;125(7):1054-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Baker CW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Connor CG, Elman MJ, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, Melia M, Pieramici DJ, Sun JK, Beck RW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Association of Baseline Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness With 1-Year Efficacy of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;134(2):127-34. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4599.
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Brucker AJ, Ferris FL, Hampton GR, Jhaveri C, Melia M, Beck RW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
Jampol LM, Glassman AR, Bressler NM. Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Diabetic Macular Edema: Three Comparisons for the Price of 1 Study From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;133(9):983-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1880. No abstract available.
Jampol LM, Glassman AR, Bressler NM, Wells JA, Ayala AR; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Diabetic Macular Edema: Additional Efficacy Post Hoc Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3698. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3698.
Ross EL, Hutton DW, Stein JD, Bressler NM, Jampol LM, Glassman AR; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Analysis From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Comparative Effectiveness Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 1;134(8):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669.
Wells JA 3rd, Glassman AR, Jampol LM. Targeting the Effect of VEGF in Diabetic Macular Edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):481-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505684. No abstract available.
Bressler NM, Glassman AR, Hutton DW. Controversies in Using Off-Label Intravitreous Bevacizumab for Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema-Reply. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 1;135(3):291-292. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5686. No abstract available.
Bressler SB, Liu D, Glassman AR, Blodi BA, Castellarin AA, Jampol LM, Kaufman PL, Melia M, Singh H, Wells JA; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Change in Diabetic Retinopathy Through 2 Years: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):558-568. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0821.
Bressler NM, Beaulieu WT, Glassman AR, Blinder KJ, Bressler SB, Jampol LM, Melia M, Wells JA 3rd; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565.
Glassman AR, Liu D, Jampol LM, Sun JK; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Changes in Blood Pressure and Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio in a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Mar 1;59(3):1199-1205. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22853.
Bressler NM, Beaulieu WT, Maguire MG, Glassman AR, Blinder KJ, Bressler SB, Gonzalez VH, Jampol LM, Melia M, Sun JK, Wells JA 3rd; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Early Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Two-Year Outcomes Among Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema in Protocol T. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;195:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
Bressler SB, Odia I, Maguire MG, Dhoot DS, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Marcus DM, Solomon SD, Sun JK; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Factors Associated With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Changes When Treating Diabetic Macular Edema With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: An Exploratory Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 1;137(4):382-389. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6786.
Bressler NM, Odia I, Maguire M, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, MacCumber MW, Shah C, Rosberger D, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Association Between Change in Visual Acuity and Change in Central Subfield Thickness During Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Participants Randomized to Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 1;137(9):977-985. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1963.
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):e5-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.032. No abstract available.
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Ayala A, Bressler NM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2017 Mar;124(3):e26-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.001. No abstract available.
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Bressler NM, Ayala AR, Jampol LM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2017 Apr;124(4):e38-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.032. No abstract available.
Glassman AR, Duh EJ, Liu D, Jampol LM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2018 Nov;125(11):e82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.004. No abstract available.
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Arnold-Bush B, Baker CW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Elman MJ, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, Melia M, Pieramici DJ, Sun JK, Beck RW. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
Talcott KE, Valentim CCS, Hill L, Stoilov I, Singh RP. Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity and Time to Diabetic Macular Edema Resolution with Ranibizumab Treatment: A Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 Jul;7(7):605-611. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Pawloff M, Bogunovic H, Gruber A, Michl M, Riedl S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. SYSTEMATIC CORRELATION OF CENTRAL SUBFIELD THICKNESS WITH RETINAL FLUID VOLUMES QUANTIFIED BY DEEP LEARNING IN THE MAJOR EXUDATIVE MACULAR DISEASES. Retina. 2022 May 1;42(5):831-841. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003385.
Roberts PK, Vogl WD, Gerendas BS, Glassman AR, Bogunovic H, Jampol LM, Schmidt-Erfurth UM. Quantification of Fluid Resolution and Visual Acuity Gain in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Using Deep Learning: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 1;138(9):945-953. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2457.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EY14231
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EY23207
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EY18817
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DRCR.net Protocol T
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.