Effects of a Fall Preventive Exercise Program on Intrinsic Fall Risk Factors in Healthy Older Adults.

NCT ID: NCT01906034

Last Updated: 2017-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background With increasing age neuromuscular deficits (e.g., sarcopenia) may result in impaired physical performance and an increased risk for falls. Prominent intrinsic fall-risk factors are age-related decreases in balance and strength / power performance as well as cognitive decline. Additional studies are needed to develop specifically tailored exercise programs for older adults that can easily be implemented into clinical practice. Thus, the objective of the present trial is to assess the effects of a fall prevention program that was developed by an interdisciplinary expert panel on measures of balance, strength / power, body composition, cognition, psychosocial well-being, and falls self-efficacy in healthy older adults. Additionally, the time-related effects of detraining are tested.

Methods/Design Healthy old people (N = 66) between the age of 65 to 80 years will participate in this trial. The testing protocol comprises tests for the assessment of static / dynamic steady-state balance (i.e., Sharpened Romberg Test, instrumented gait analysis), proactive balance (i.e., Functional Reach Test; Timed Up and Go Test), reactive balance (i.e., perturbation test during bipedal stance; Push and Release Test), strength (i.e., hand grip strength test; Chair Stand Test), and power (i.e., Stair Climb Power Test). Further, body composition will be analysed using a bioelectrical impedance analysis system. In addition, questionnaires for the assessment of psychosocial (i.e., World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment-Bref), cognitive (i.e., Mini Mental State Examination), and fall risk determinants (i.e., Fall Efficacy Scale - International) will be included in the study protocol. Participants will be randomized into two intervention groups or the control / waiting group. After baseline measures, participants in the intervention groups will conduct a 12-week balance and strength / power exercise intervention 3 times per week, with each training session lasting 30 min (without warm-up and cool-down). One intervention group will complete a supervised training program (2x supervised training per week / 1x home training per week), while the other intervention group will complete a training after the same protocol that is home-based (3x home training per week) and controlled by phone calls every two weeks. Post-tests will be conducted right after the intervention period. Additionally, detraining effects will be measured 12 weeks after program cessation. The control group / waiting group will not participate in any specific intervention during the experimental period, but will receive the extensive supervised program after the experimental period.

Discussion It is expected that particularly the supervised combination of balance and strength / power training will improve performance in variables of balance, strength / power, body composition, cognitive function, psychosocial well-being, and falls self-efficacy of older adults. In addition, information regarding fall risk assessment, detraining effects, and supervision of training will be provided. Further, training-induced health-relevant changes, such as improved performance in activities of daily living, cognitive function, and quality of life, as well as a reduced risk for falls may help to lower costs in the health care system. Finally, practitioners, therapists, and instructors will be provided with a scientifically evaluated, feasible, safe, and easy-to-administer exercise program for fall prevention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fall Risk Factors Fall Prevention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exercise with supervision

The expert panel selected balance and strength / power exercises which can be performed with one's own bodyweight or with the help of small, low-cost exercise equipment (i.e., small weights, resistance bands, unstable surfaces). In this study, intensity during training will be regulated using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale (i.e., 6-20 points, maximal exertion at 20 points). According to the individual fitness level, exercises should be performed with a perceived exertion between 12 and 16 points (somewhat hard - hard) during balance and strength / power training. Exercise intensity will be progressed individually using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale and varying the balance and strength / power exercises in order to sufficiently stimulate the neuromuscular system. Strength / power exercises will be progressed from single to multiple joint, isometric to dynamic muscle contraction, short to long lever arm and slow to fast exercises.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise with supervision

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Home-based without supervision

The expert panel selected balance and strength / power exercises which can be performed with one's own bodyweight or with the help of small, low-cost exercise equipment (i.e., small weights, resistance bands, unstable surfaces). In this study, intensity during training will be regulated using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale (i.e., 6-20 points, maximal exertion at 20 points). According to the individual fitness level, exercises should be performed with a perceived exertion between 12 and 16 points (somewhat hard - hard) during balance and strength / power training. Exercise intensity will be progressed individually using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale and varying the balance and strength / power exercises in order to sufficiently stimulate the neuromuscular system. Strength / power exercises will be progressed from single to multiple joint, isometric to dynamic muscle contraction, short to long lever arm and slow to fast exercises.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Home-based without supervision

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

control group

The control group is a traditional waiting group and will receive a supervised training program after the completion of this study

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise with supervision

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Home-based without supervision

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 65-80 years old
* must be able to accomplish the tests and the training
* must be able to walk independently

Exclusion Criteria

* neurological diseases: Alzheimer´s disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson etc.
* cardiovascular diseases: coronary heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias etc.
* artificial knee- hip-joint in the last six months
* regular participation in strength and/or balance training programs
* acute injuries impairing the tests
* disturbances of balance
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Swiss Council for Accident Prevention

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Prof. Dr. Reto W. Kressig and Dr. Yves Gschwind, University Center for Medicine of Aging Basel (UAB), Felix Platter-Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Potsdam

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Urs Granacher

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Urs Granacher, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Potsdam, Department of Training and Movement Science

Andre Lacroix, Master

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Potsdam, Department of Training and Movement Science

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Potsdam, Department of Training and Movement Sciences

Potsdam, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Granacher U, Muehlbauer T, Gruber M. A qualitative review of balance and strength performance in healthy older adults: impact for testing and training. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:708905. doi: 10.1155/2012/708905. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22315687 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Muehlbauer T, Zahner L, Gollhofer A, Kressig RW. Comparison of traditional and recent approaches in the promotion of balance and strength in older adults. Sports Med. 2011 May 1;41(5):377-400. doi: 10.2165/11539920-000000000-00000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21510715 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Gruber M, Gollhofer A. Resistance training and neuromuscular performance in seniors. Int J Sports Med. 2009 Sep;30(9):652-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224178. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19569007 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Strass D. Training induced adaptations in characteristics of postural reflexes in elderly men. Gait Posture. 2006 Dec;24(4):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.007. Epub 2006 Feb 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16472525 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Hortobagyi T, Kressig RW, Muehlbauer T. The importance of trunk muscle strength for balance, functional performance, and fall prevention in seniors: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):627-41. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0041-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23568373 (View on PubMed)

Beijersbergen CM, Granacher U, Vandervoort AA, DeVita P, Hortobagyi T. The biomechanical mechanism of how strength and power training improves walking speed in old adults remains unknown. Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Mar;12(2):618-27. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23501431 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Lacroix A, Muehlbauer T, Roettger K, Gollhofer A. Effects of core instability strength training on trunk muscle strength, spinal mobility, dynamic balance and functional mobility in older adults. Gerontology. 2013;59(2):105-13. doi: 10.1159/000343152. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23108436 (View on PubMed)

Muehlbauer T, Besemer C, Wehrle A, Gollhofer A, Granacher U. Relationship between strength, power and balance performance in seniors. Gerontology. 2012;58(6):504-12. doi: 10.1159/000341614. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22922168 (View on PubMed)

Muehlbauer T, Roth R, Bopp M, Granacher U. An exercise sequence for progression in balance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):568-74. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225f3c4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22067238 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Bridenbaugh SA, Muehlbauer T, Wehrle A, Kressig RW. Age-related effects on postural control under multi-task conditions. Gerontology. 2011;57(3):247-55. doi: 10.1159/000322196. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20980734 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Muehlbauer T, Bridenbaugh S, Bleiker E, Wehrle A, Kressig RW. Balance training and multi-task performance in seniors. Int J Sports Med. 2010 May;31(5):353-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248322. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20180173 (View on PubMed)

Granacher U, Gruber M, Gollhofer A. Force production capacity and functional reflex activity in young and elderly men. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010 Oct-Dec;22(5-6):374-82. doi: 10.1007/BF03337733. Epub 2009 Nov 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19966537 (View on PubMed)

Lacroix A, Kressig RW, Muehlbauer T, Gschwind YJ, Pfenninger B, Bruegger O, Granacher U. Effects of a Supervised versus an Unsupervised Combined Balance and Strength Training Program on Balance and Muscle Power in Healthy Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gerontology. 2016;62(3):275-88. doi: 10.1159/000442087. Epub 2015 Dec 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26645282 (View on PubMed)

Gschwind YJ, Kressig RW, Lacroix A, Muehlbauer T, Pfenninger B, Granacher U. A best practice fall prevention exercise program to improve balance, strength / power, and psychosocial health in older adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2013 Oct 9;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-105.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24106864 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BFU-2.104

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Motor Training for Fall Prevention
NCT01621958 COMPLETED NA