Effect of Delayed Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Myocardial Injury

NCT ID: NCT01903161

Last Updated: 2015-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate delayed myocardial protective effect of RIPC in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ischemic preconditioning is one of the strategies that can reduce perioperative myocardial injury. It is a concept that briefly induced ischemia and reperfusion before the myocardial injury can reduce the myocardial injury. But it is difficult to apply ischemic preconditioning in operative field, because cross-clamping of aorta or coronary artery is difficult and invasive. Afterward concept of remote ischemic preconditioning(RIPC) has introduced that ischemia of remote organs like kidneys, skeletal muscles can reduce distant myocardial injury.

It is known that myocardial protective effect of ischemic preconditioning have biphasic pattern. Early protective effect wanes after a few hours, then recurs after 24-48 hours, and can persist for up to 3-4 days. It is called second window of preconditioning or delayed ischemic preconditioning. Delayed ischemic preconditioning is similar to early ischemic preconditioning in mechanism but it is different that it produces protein that can mediate myocardial protection effect.

Unlike ischemic preconditioning, it is little known about delayed effect of RIPC. RIPC can be done by applying compression cuff on upper or lower extremities and it is noninvasive and easy to deliver compared to ischemic preconditioning that is done by aorta or coronary artery clamping.

Delayed ischemic preconditioning is performed one day before the surgery, and it is safe and easy to apply RIPC in a clinical setting. And in this study investigators are going to evaluate cardioprotective effect of delayed RIPC. Myocardial injury can be predicted by elevation of cardiac enzyme. Investigators are going to perform RIPC one day before the valve replacement surgery and compare troponin I with control group to assess cardioprotective effect of delayed RIPC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myocardial Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

delayed remote ischemic preconditioning

applying pneumatic cuff on upper extremity (5 minutes cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion with pneumatic cuff up to 200 mmHg repeated by four times)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

delayed remote ischemic preconditioning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the delayed RIPC group, RIPC is performed 24-48 hr before surgery by 5 minutes limb ischemia and reperfusion with pneumatic cuff up to 200 mmHg repeated by four times.

control

All the procedures were the same in the control group, except for the fact that the three-way stopcock between the pneumatic cuff and the cuff inflator was opened and therefore the cuff pressure did not increase.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

control

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the control group, all the procedures were the same with delayed RIPC group, except for the fact that the three-way stopcock between the pneumatic cuff and the cuff inflator was opened and therefore the cuff pressure did not increase.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

delayed remote ischemic preconditioning

In the delayed RIPC group, RIPC is performed 24-48 hr before surgery by 5 minutes limb ischemia and reperfusion with pneumatic cuff up to 200 mmHg repeated by four times.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

control

In the control group, all the procedures were the same with delayed RIPC group, except for the fact that the three-way stopcock between the pneumatic cuff and the cuff inflator was opened and therefore the cuff pressure did not increase.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 - 80 years of adult patient undergoing cardiac valve surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient who did not agree to the study
* Emergency operation
* Using inotropics, mechanical assisting device
* Severe liver disease (\>Child class II )
* Severe renal disease (Renal replacement therapy)
* left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%
* Co-operation of major surgery (Carotid endarterectomy )
* Oral hypoglycemic agent (Sulfonylurea, Glibenclamide)
* peripheral vascular disease affecting upper extremity
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yunseok Jeon

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deok Man Hong, M.D., Ph. D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Tae Kyong Kim, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

delayed RIPC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.