Dose-dependent Effects of Vitamin D on Bone Health

NCT ID: NCT01900860

Last Updated: 2019-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

311 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We propose to conduct a randomized double blind trial of three doses of vitamin D, 400, 4000, and 10,000 International Units (IU) per day, to assess the effect on bone density and architecture as assessed by high resolution peripheral quantitative tomography (HR-pQCT) measurements at the radius and distal tibia, and standard Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Other measures of bone and calcium metabolism will be assessed. The trial will last as long as three years. Approximately 300 healthy men and women, aged 50-70 years of age, will be recruited, and randomly assigned to one of the three doses of vitamin D. Other outcome variables assessed include quality of life, depression, muscle strength and balance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypotheses being tested:

1. It is hypothesized that vitamin D, in a dose-dependent manner, will suppress parathyroid hormone action, resulting in less bone turnover, and decreased cortical porosity, leading to improved bone strength as assessed by finite element analysis.
2. It is hypothesized that vitamin D, in a dose-dependent manner, will increase bone density in the central skeleton (spine, hip), as measured by the current standard method of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
3. It is hypothesized that vitamin D, in a dose-dependent manner, will have an impact on quality of life, including indices of depression, as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire and an appropriate index of depression.

Outcomes:

Primary outcomes:

* (1) bone density and (2) strength as measured by HR-pQCT

Secondary outcomes:

* HR-pQCT assessment of bone microarchitecture, examining the relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone. We have chosen four parameters for statistical analysis, and have listed them as secondary outcome variables in the section below: cortical density, cortical porosity, trabecular density and trabecular number.
* bone mineral density as measured by DXA
* parameters of calcium metabolism, including biochemical markers of bone turnover and DNA to examine possible variations in the genes that control vitamin D metabolism.
* quality of life score
* depression scale score
* balance, grip strength.
* fasting glucose and Hemoglobin A1C will also be measured.
* Safety will be assessed during the scheduled follow-up visits by obtaining history of adverse events, as well as measurements of serum and urine parameters of mineral metabolism as described below.

INTERVENTION DRUG: Vitamin D3 in one of three doses Rationale: For adults under age 70 years, the recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) report recommends a total intake of 600 IU vitamin D/day will provide all the vitamin D needed for bone health, and since the typical Canadian diet contains between 200 and 300 units of vitamin D, the subjects in the lowest dose arm of our study will receive 400 IU/day. The other two groups will receive 10,000 IU and 4,000 IU, respectively. The 10,000 IU dose is the tolerable upper intake level (TUL) recommended by Hathcock et al (Am J Clin Nutr 2007) and 4,000 IU is the IOM's recommended TUL.

Calcium intake:

All subjects will have adequate calcium intake as defined by the Institute of Medicine (total of 1200 mg/day). A brief dietary history will be taken and subjects will be instructed to take an appropriate dose of supplemental calcium if their daily intake is less than 1200 mg/day (the IOM's Recommended Daily Allowance for this study population).

Interim analysis (with maintenance of blinding of subjects and investigators as to treatment arm):

* planned at and of years 1 and 2, as well as the final analysis at year 3.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Age-Related Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

vitamin D 10,000 IU

Subjects in this arm receive 10,000 IU Vitamin D p.o. (as 5 drops of a blinded vitamin D solution) per day. Duration: 3 years

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitamin D

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Three different doses of vitamin D will be administered in a double-blinded fashion. The three doses are 400, 4000, or 10,000 IU/day

Vitamin D 4000 IU

Subjects in this arm receive 4,000 IU Vitamin D p.o. (as 5 drops of a blinded vitamin D solution) per day. Duration: 3 years

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitamin D

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Three different doses of vitamin D will be administered in a double-blinded fashion. The three doses are 400, 4000, or 10,000 IU/day

Vitamin D 400 IU

Subjects in this arm receive 400 IU Vitamin D p.o. (as 5 drops of a blinded vitamin D solution) per day. Duration: 3 years

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitamin D

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Three different doses of vitamin D will be administered in a double-blinded fashion. The three doses are 400, 4000, or 10,000 IU/day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vitamin D

Three different doses of vitamin D will be administered in a double-blinded fashion. The three doses are 400, 4000, or 10,000 IU/day

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vitamin D3, Cholecalciferol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy women and men between 55 and 70 years of age; women will be at least 5 years post-menopause. Presence of a chronic illness does not exclude participation if the condition is stable and managed by a physician.
* Baseline lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) T-score above 2.5 as assessed using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Exclusion Criteria

* A serum 25-\[OH\] vitamin D (25OHD) of \<30 nmol/L (\<12 ng/mL) or \>125 nmol/L (50 ng/mL).
* Hypercalcemia (serum calcium \>2.55 mmol/L), hypocalcemia (serum calcium \<2.10 mmol/L) or eGFR \<30 mL/min.
* Surgical cure of Primary Hyperparathyroidism within the last year.
* Active kidney stone disease (recurrent stones, recent kidney stone \[within last 2 years\])
* Known hypersensitivity or allergy to Vitamin D
* Serum creatinine, AST, ALT, PTH, calcium, or alkaline phosphatase greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal at the screening visit
* BMD exclusions:

1. High 10-year risk for osteoporotic fracture, as defined by the Canadian Association of Radiologists/Osteoporosis Canada calculator, or the World Health Organization's FRAX calculator.
2. DXA T-score below or equal to -2.5 SD.
* Have taken bone active osteoporosis prescription drugs in the past 2 years (bisphosphonates) or 1 year (other osteoporosis prescription therapies).
* Any medical condition that would prevent participation in a clinical trial for a full three years.
* Medications such as prednisone \>2.5 mg daily (or equivalent); other bone active medications such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer, or androgen deprivation therapy of prostate cancer.
* Disorders known to affect vitamin D metabolism such as sarcoidosis or renal failure or malabsorption disorders (e.g. pancreatic insufficiency or celiac disease).
* Regular (monthly or more frequent) use of tanning salons.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pure North S'Energy Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David A. Hanley, MD, FRCPC

Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David A Hanley, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Calgary

Steven K Boyd, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Calgary

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Burt LA, Gaudet S, Kan M, Rose MS, Billington EO, Boyd SK, Hanley DA. Methods and procedures for: A randomized double-blind study investigating dose-dependent longitudinal effects of vitamin D supplementation on bone health. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;67:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29471124 (View on PubMed)

Burt LA, Billington EO, Rose MS, Kremer R, Hanley DA, Boyd SK. Adverse Effects of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density Are Greater in Females than Males. J Bone Miner Res. 2020 Dec;35(12):2404-2414. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4152. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32777104 (View on PubMed)

Billington EO, Burt LA, Plett R, Rose MS, Boyd SK, Hanley DA. Effect of high-dose vitamin D supplementation on peripheral arterial calcification: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2020 Nov;31(11):2141-2150. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05500-2. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32556518 (View on PubMed)

Billington EO, Burt LA, Rose MS, Davison EM, Gaudet S, Kan M, Boyd SK, Hanley DA. Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Apr 1;105(4):dgz212. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz212.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31746327 (View on PubMed)

Burt LA, Billington EO, Rose MS, Raymond DA, Hanley DA, Boyd SK. Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Aug 27;322(8):736-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11889.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31454046 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20130101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.