Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
230 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-04-30
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does Treatment of Hypovitaminosis D Increase Calcium Absorption?
NCT00581828
Vitamin D Administration in the Nursing Home
NCT00204919
Effects of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Man
NCT01848236
Correction of Vitamin D Inadequacy in Nursing Home Residents
NCT00204906
The Impact of Severe Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Correction on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in Postmenopausal Women
NCT01694355
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) is a milder form of hypovitaminosis D defined as a 25(OH)D level between 15 and 30 ng/mL regardless of parathyroid hormone (PTH) status. Experts disagree on whether to treat VDI, as the clinical benefits of therapy are uncertain. Some experts insist the optimal 25(OH)D level is ≥30 ng/mL. By contrast, both the Food and Nutrition Board and NIH Evidence Report No. 158 state that insufficient evidence exists to declare the optimal serum 25(OH)D for bone health, despite review of \~170 studies. Consequently, the Food and Nutrition Board cannot determine a recommended daily allowance for vitamin D. Confusion over the optimal 25(OH)D level results, in part, because previous trials failed to recruit subjects based on initial 25(OH)D levels and/or failed to target or achieve 25(OH)D levels ≥30 ng/mL. Moreover, secondary HPT, the proposed mechanism by which VDI causes bone loss, occurs in only 10% to 33% of people with VDI. As such, people with VDI and normal PTH might not experience clinical benefits from vitamin D therapy. VDI is widespread, affecting 26% to 39% of postmenopausal American women with and without osteoporosis. Therefore, determining the ideal 25(OH)D level for optimal calcium homeostasis and bone health is of utmost clinical and public health importance. Our overall goal, congruent with Healthy People 2010 objective 2-9, is to evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with VDI, as reflected by changes in Ca·Ab, BMD and muscle fitness. Our second goal is to evaluate whether a high-dose vitamin D regimen, chosen to achieve and maintain a 25(OH)D level ≥30 ng/mL, is superior in its effects on study outcomes compared to a low-dose vitamin D regimen that can permit continued VDI.
We will conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial of low-dose and high-dose vitamin D in postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency in order to investigate the following aims:
1. To evaluate the effect of vitamin D3 therapy on Ca·Ab in postmenopausal women less than or equal to 75 years old with VDI. Sub-aims include the investigation of subject variables influencing Ca·Ab and 25(OH)D levels at baseline and one month, the accuracy of oral isotope plasma levels for Ca·Ab measurement and the ability of a questionnaire to identify patients with low vitamin D status.
2. To evaluate the effects of vitamin D3 therapy on the 12-month change in BMD and bone turnover in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing change in BMD and an evaluation of the relationship between changes in Ca·Ab and changes in BMD.
3. To evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on muscle mass and functional capacity in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. We will measure muscle mass by whole body bone densitometry and assess muscle function using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test and the modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing muscle outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Dose Vitamin D3
Loading Dose: 50,000 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days and placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days.
Maintenance Dose: 50,000 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days and placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days.
High Dose Vitamin D3
Yellow gel-cap vitamin D3 at 50,000 International Units daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. Daily white placebo pills.
Low Dose Vitamin D3
Loading Dose: 800 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days plus placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days.
Maintenance Dose: 800 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days plus placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days.
Low Dose Vitamin D3
White gel-cap vitamin D3 at 800 International Units to take orally, daily for 365 days. Intermittent yellow placebo pills.
Placebo
Loading Dose: Placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days plus placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days.
Maintenance Dose: Placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days plus placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days.
Placebo
Yellow gel-cap placebo pills to take orally, daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. White gel-cap placebo pills once daily for 365 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High Dose Vitamin D3
Yellow gel-cap vitamin D3 at 50,000 International Units daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. Daily white placebo pills.
Low Dose Vitamin D3
White gel-cap vitamin D3 at 800 International Units to take orally, daily for 365 days. Intermittent yellow placebo pills.
Placebo
Yellow gel-cap placebo pills to take orally, daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. White gel-cap placebo pills once daily for 365 days.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women ≥ 5 years past the date of last menses or bilateral oophorectomy, or ≥ 60 years old if they had prior hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy
* Total dietary and supplemental calcium intake \< 600 mg daily but ≤ 1,400 mg daily, based on a food frequency questionnaire
Exclusion Criteria
* Hypercalcemia (serum calcium corrected for albumin \> 10.4 mg/dL)
* Nephrolithiasis by medical record or patient report
* Inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption or chronic diarrhea
* Stage 3, 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease based on the Modification of Renal Diet (MDRD) formula
* Use of bone-active medications within the past 6 months including bisphosphonates, estrogen compounds, calcitonin, teriparatide, oral corticosteroids and anticonvulsants
* Allergy or intolerance to orange juice
* Allergy or intolerance to sunscreen
* Prior adult clinical fragility fracture of the hip, spine or wrist or a T-score below -2.5 at the lumbar spine or femur
75 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karen E Hansen, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hansen KE, Jones AN, Lindstrom MJ, Davis LA, Engelke JA, Shafer MM. Vitamin D insufficiency: disease or no disease? J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Jul;23(7):1052-60. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080230.
Ramsubeik K, Keuler NS, Davis LA, Hansen KE. Factors associated with calcium absorption in postmenopausal women: a post hoc analysis of dual-isotope studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 May;114(5):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Nabak AC, Johnson RE, Keuler NS, Hansen KE. Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women? Public Health Nutr. 2014 Apr;17(4):739-46. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001973. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
Hansen KE, Johnson RE, Chambers KR, Johnson MG, Lemon CC, Vo TN, Marvdashti S. Treatment of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1612-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3874.
Vreede AP, Jones AN, Hansen KE. Can serum isotope levels accurately measure intestinal calcium absorption compared to gold-standard methods? Nutr J. 2015 Jul 31;14:73. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0065-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
supplement
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
H-2009-0055
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.