Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Use of Jet Injection Lidocaine for Blood Draws in Young Children (NCT NCT01890642)

NCT ID: NCT01890642

Last Updated: 2015-10-06

Results Overview

Pain score assessed by video reviewer at J-tip, J-tip noise or researcher approach (1 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at J-tip noise/researcher approach was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

205 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3 min

Results posted on

2015-10-06

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
J Tip Noise
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Overall Study
STARTED
56
53
96
Overall Study
COMPLETED
56
53
96
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

The Use of Jet Injection Lidocaine for Blood Draws in Young Children

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Total
n=205 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
56 Participants
n=93 Participants
53 Participants
n=4 Participants
96 Participants
n=27 Participants
205 Participants
n=483 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
Age, Continuous
3.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=93 Participants
2.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=4 Participants
3.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=27 Participants
3.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=483 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
42 Participants
n=27 Participants
83 Participants
n=483 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants
n=93 Participants
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
54 Participants
n=27 Participants
122 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
38 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants
n=93 Participants
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
45 Participants
n=27 Participants
110 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
16 Participants
n=27 Participants
25 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
29 Participants
n=483 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 participants
n=93 Participants
53 participants
n=4 Participants
96 participants
n=27 Participants
205 participants
n=483 Participants
Previous Venipuncture
55 participants
n=93 Participants
51 participants
n=4 Participants
96 participants
n=27 Participants
202 participants
n=483 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 min

Pain score assessed by video reviewer at J-tip, J-tip noise or researcher approach (1 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at J-tip noise/researcher approach was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Change in Pain Score on FLACC Scale From Device Deployment to Venipuncture
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
2.82 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
0.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At venipuncture (3 minutes)

Pain score as assessed by video reviewers. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Pain Score
5.75 units on a scale
Interval 2.75 to 9.0
8 units on a scale
Interval 3.5 to 10.0
5.25 units on a scale
Interval 1.5 to 8.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 3 minutes

Proportion of patients where blood draw was successful on first attempt

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Fist Attempt Success
52 participants
48 participants
86 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 min

Pain score assessed by video reviewer before intervention (0 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at baseline was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Change in Pain Score From Baseline
2.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
3.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
1.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.31

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 minute

Pain when J-tip deployed assessed by video reviewers using pain scale. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Pain at J-tip Deployment
3.25 units on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 7.25
2.5 units on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 6.5
4.0 units on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 8.5

Adverse Events

J Tip Noise

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pain Ease

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

J Tip

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 13 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
J Tip Noise
n=46 participants at risk;n=56 participants at risk
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
Pain Ease
n=46 participants at risk;n=53 participants at risk
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
J Tip
n=83 participants at risk;n=96 participants at risk
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine 1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bruise present at 24 hours
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
14.5%
12/83 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Redness
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
0.00%
0/46 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
0.00%
0/83 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Other/Not Specified
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.

Additional Information

Maren Lunoe

Medical College of Wisconsin

Phone: 414-266-2625

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place