Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Use of Jet Injection Lidocaine for Blood Draws in Young Children (NCT NCT01890642)
NCT ID: NCT01890642
Last Updated: 2015-10-06
Results Overview
Pain score assessed by video reviewer at J-tip, J-tip noise or researcher approach (1 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at J-tip noise/researcher approach was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.
COMPLETED
NA
205 participants
3 min
2015-10-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
56
|
53
|
96
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
56
|
53
|
96
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The Use of Jet Injection Lidocaine for Blood Draws in Young Children
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
Total
n=205 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
56 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
205 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
3.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=93 Participants
|
2.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=4 Participants
|
3.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=27 Participants
|
3.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
31 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
34 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
56 participants
n=93 Participants
|
53 participants
n=4 Participants
|
96 participants
n=27 Participants
|
205 participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Previous Venipuncture
|
55 participants
n=93 Participants
|
51 participants
n=4 Participants
|
96 participants
n=27 Participants
|
202 participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 minPain score assessed by video reviewer at J-tip, J-tip noise or researcher approach (1 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at J-tip noise/researcher approach was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Score on FLACC Scale From Device Deployment to Venipuncture
|
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
2.82 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
0.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At venipuncture (3 minutes)Pain score as assessed by video reviewers. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pain Score
|
5.75 units on a scale
Interval 2.75 to 9.0
|
8 units on a scale
Interval 3.5 to 10.0
|
5.25 units on a scale
Interval 1.5 to 8.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 minutesProportion of patients where blood draw was successful on first attempt
Outcome measures
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fist Attempt Success
|
52 participants
|
48 participants
|
86 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 minPain score assessed by video reviewer before intervention (0 minute) and at venipuncture (3 minutes). The score at baseline was subtracted from the score at venipuncture to give a number indicating the change in pain scores. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Score From Baseline
|
2.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
3.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
1.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 minutePain when J-tip deployed assessed by video reviewers using pain scale. The FLACC (Face, legs, activity, cry and consolability) Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), was used to assess pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
n=56 Participants
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
n=53 Participants
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
n=96 Participants
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pain at J-tip Deployment
|
3.25 units on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 7.25
|
2.5 units on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 6.5
|
4.0 units on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 8.5
|
Adverse Events
J Tip Noise
Pain Ease
J Tip
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
J Tip Noise
n=46 participants at risk;n=56 participants at risk
This group will have a J tip deployed without medication to create the noise that the device makes. They will also receive Pain Ease spray
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
Pain Ease
n=46 participants at risk;n=53 participants at risk
This group will receive Pain Ease Spray
Pain Ease Spray: Cold Spray used to anesthetize the skin
|
J Tip
n=83 participants at risk;n=96 participants at risk
This group will receive 1% buffered lidocaine via Jet Injection. They will receive placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray) to maintain blinding
J tip: This is a Jet Injection system which for our study will be loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine
1% buffered lidocaine: Lidocaine placed using Jet Injection
placebo cooling spray (normal saline spray): Normal Saline Sprayed as placebo for Pain Ease spray
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bruise present at 24 hours
|
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
14.5%
12/83 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Redness
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Other/Not Specified
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed for serious events immediately following venipuncture and then the next day via phone follow up.
All patients were assessed for serious adverse events in the lab. Attempts were made to contact the families of all patients the next day for follow up. The research team was unable to contact some families for follow up, therefore the number of patients assessed for Other Adverse Events is smaller than those assessed for Serious Adverse Events.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place