PET Enhanced CT Scan Performance in Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01881620

Last Updated: 2024-11-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

109 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-19

Study Completion Date

2015-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypothesis:

The investigators would like to demonstrate that diagnosis performance of PET/CT scan without and with contrast agent (COMBI TEP), are equivalent or better than those of PET/ non enhanced CT scan (PET scan) associated with an enhanced CT scan. This research project is a pilot study given the few available data concerning this imaging exam reproducibility.

This study is a prospective single center study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis:

We would like to demonstrate that diagnosis performance of PET/CT scan without and with contrast agent (COMBI TEP), are equivalent or better than those of PET/ non enhanced CT scan (PET scan) associated with an enhanced CT scan. This research project is a pilot study given the few available data concerning this imaging exam reproducibility. This study allows us to assess the feasibility of such a large-scale study, but also to evaluate COMBI TEP performance. From these estimates, we can then consider a comparative study to evaluate the performance of COMBI PET.

This study is a prospective single center study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Disease Progression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan

COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan

Intervention Type DEVICE

diagnostic imaging exam

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan

diagnostic imaging exam

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

diagnostic imaging exam

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Any patient with a cancerous disease for which PET scan is indicated in the SOR (Standards - Options - Recommendations) FDG PET 2003 updated in 2006 must be included in the trial, in the following locations:

1. Digestive cancers

* Colorectal cancer

* Preoperative evaluation in local and metastatic recurrence
* Location of recurrences, in case of ACE increase in a previously operated patient.
* Esophageal cancer: initial staging.
* Pancreatic cancer

* Initial staging,
* Differential diagnosis with chronic pancreatitis.
* Liver cancer: differential diagnosis of liver metastases, cholangiocarcinoma and benign tumors in the case of an isolated hepatic localization.
* Digestive Endocrine tumors: staging in case of normal pentetreotide scintigraphy.
2. Lung cancer

* Initial staging,
* Diagnosis of lung isolated lesion \> 1 cm.
3. Head and neck cancer

* Initial pretreatment staging,
* Recurrence diagnosis
4. Lymphoma

* Initial staging of Hodgkin's disease (HD), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and aggressive follicular lymphomas,
* Diagnosis of minimal residual disease of HD and aggressive NHL,
* Early assessment of treatment response.
5. Thyroid cancer: suspicion of residual disease or relapse when conventional imaging data are insufficient.
6. Ovarian cancer recurrence
7. Age ≥ 18 years.
8. Chest-abdomen-pelvis enhanced CT scan achieved within 4 weeks before enrollment (with cuts of less than 5 mm).
9. Woman of childbearing age with negative pregnancy test and / or contraception.
10. Patient with informed consent signed.
11. Patient affiliated to social security schemes.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Iodine known allergy.
2. Diabetes, excepted if controlled (hemoglucotest ≤ 1.6 g).
3. Known renal failure (creatinine clearance \<60ml/min).
4. Indications against Xenetix ®:

* Hypersensitivity to Xenetix ® or any of the excipients,
* History of an immediate response or delayed cutaneous reaction to Xenetix ® injection.
* Thyrotoxicosis.
5. Pregnant or lactating women.
6. Unable to undergo medical follow up for geographical, social or psychological reasons,
7. Private of freedom patient and adult under a legal guardianship or unable to consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Bergonié

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

CAZEAU Anne Laure, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Institut Bergonié

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.bergonie.fr/les-essais-cliniques/

Site internet du promoteur, l'Institut Bergonié

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IB2009-70

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Standard PET/CT vs. Digital PET/CT
NCT03081767 COMPLETED NA
Hybrid PET/CT in Cancer Patients
NCT00396916 COMPLETED NA