Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
109 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-19
2015-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators would like to demonstrate that diagnosis performance of PET/CT scan without and with contrast agent (COMBI TEP), are equivalent or better than those of PET/ non enhanced CT scan (PET scan) associated with an enhanced CT scan. This research project is a pilot study given the few available data concerning this imaging exam reproducibility.
This study is a prospective single center study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PET-CT Imaging With PCD-CT
NCT07242690
Comparison of PET/CT vs. PET/MRI Using 2 Radiopharmaceuticals
NCT03125629
PET/CT Evaluation of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer
NCT01222416
Comparison Study Between PET/CT and Whole-Body Diffusion Weighted MRI in the Detection of Distant Malignancies
NCT06205901
Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients
NCT01557881
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We would like to demonstrate that diagnosis performance of PET/CT scan without and with contrast agent (COMBI TEP), are equivalent or better than those of PET/ non enhanced CT scan (PET scan) associated with an enhanced CT scan. This research project is a pilot study given the few available data concerning this imaging exam reproducibility. This study allows us to assess the feasibility of such a large-scale study, but also to evaluate COMBI TEP performance. From these estimates, we can then consider a comparative study to evaluate the performance of COMBI PET.
This study is a prospective single center study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan
COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan
COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan
diagnostic imaging exam
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
COMBI TEP : PET / enhanced CT scan
diagnostic imaging exam
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Digestive cancers
* Colorectal cancer
* Preoperative evaluation in local and metastatic recurrence
* Location of recurrences, in case of ACE increase in a previously operated patient.
* Esophageal cancer: initial staging.
* Pancreatic cancer
* Initial staging,
* Differential diagnosis with chronic pancreatitis.
* Liver cancer: differential diagnosis of liver metastases, cholangiocarcinoma and benign tumors in the case of an isolated hepatic localization.
* Digestive Endocrine tumors: staging in case of normal pentetreotide scintigraphy.
2. Lung cancer
* Initial staging,
* Diagnosis of lung isolated lesion \> 1 cm.
3. Head and neck cancer
* Initial pretreatment staging,
* Recurrence diagnosis
4. Lymphoma
* Initial staging of Hodgkin's disease (HD), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and aggressive follicular lymphomas,
* Diagnosis of minimal residual disease of HD and aggressive NHL,
* Early assessment of treatment response.
5. Thyroid cancer: suspicion of residual disease or relapse when conventional imaging data are insufficient.
6. Ovarian cancer recurrence
7. Age ≥ 18 years.
8. Chest-abdomen-pelvis enhanced CT scan achieved within 4 weeks before enrollment (with cuts of less than 5 mm).
9. Woman of childbearing age with negative pregnancy test and / or contraception.
10. Patient with informed consent signed.
11. Patient affiliated to social security schemes.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Diabetes, excepted if controlled (hemoglucotest ≤ 1.6 g).
3. Known renal failure (creatinine clearance \<60ml/min).
4. Indications against Xenetix ®:
* Hypersensitivity to Xenetix ® or any of the excipients,
* History of an immediate response or delayed cutaneous reaction to Xenetix ® injection.
* Thyrotoxicosis.
5. Pregnant or lactating women.
6. Unable to undergo medical follow up for geographical, social or psychological reasons,
7. Private of freedom patient and adult under a legal guardianship or unable to consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Bergonié
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
CAZEAU Anne Laure, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Bergonié
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Site internet du promoteur, l'Institut Bergonié
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IB2009-70
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.