Discharge Conditions of Spinal Anesthesia With Heavy Prilocaine-Fentanyl and Heavy Bupivacaine-Fentanyl
NCT ID: NCT01880775
Last Updated: 2014-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IntraopeRativE Use of periNeal Block for Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT04288349
Bowel Preparation Before Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT06403774
Treatment of Fecal Incontinence After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries
NCT01528995
Study on Repeat Liposomal Bupivacaine for Post-Surgery Pain in Anal Fistula Patients.
NCT07081373
Caudal Block,Saddle Block, Anorectal Surgery
NCT03498547
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Preoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR) and Spo2 will be measured and recorded.
Spinal anesthesia will be commenced in the sitting position with a 25 G Quincke needle, with the midline approach. After observing free flow of cerebrospinal fluid the prepared study drug will be injected in 15 seconds. The patients will be placed supine after waiting 2 minute in the sitting position. Supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula will be provided.
Fentanyl and midazolam will be used for rescue analgesia and sedation and recorded.
Sensorial block will be assessed with pinprick test with 2 minute intervals until the maximum block achieves and with 15 minute intervals until the block was regresses to S3 dermatome. Motor block will be assessed with the Bromage score when the block reached the maximum level. Patients will be transferred to postoperative care unit (PACU) at he end of surgery.
Pain will be assessed on a 10 point visual analog scale (VAS)(0= no pain, 10= worst pain ever). Postoperative analgesia will be provided with 2 mg.kg-1 tramadol or 15 mg.kg-1 paracetamol when the VAS score is ≥3 time of first analgesic request will be recorded.
Hypotension (≥20% reduced from baseline values) will be treated with ephedrine or iv fluid boluses), bradycardia (HR\<45 beat min-1 was treated with atropine) was recorded.
The patients will be asked whether to void before surgery. Bladder volume will be assessed with ultrasonography. Patients with residual bladder volumes ≥400 ml will be placed an urine catheter. Time to first urinate will be recorded.
Patients will be assessed for transient neurologic symptoms(pain in the buttocks and legs)(TNS) and satisfaction after surgery.
TNS will be evaluated with daily telephone calls. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated with global satisfaction scale (1= bad, 2=not satisfied, 3=have no idea, 4=satisfied, 5=very satisfied) Parameters to record; time of entering operation room, duration of surgery, time of intrathecal injection, onset of sensorial block(block at L1), time to reach maximum block level, maximum block level, first analgesic ingestion time, PACU duration, two segment regression, time to L1 regression, time to S3 regression, time to it without help, time to stand up without help, time to walk without help, discharge time, time to first void. TNS, patient satisfaction score.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
prilocaine heavy 2%& fentanyl
prilocaine heavy 2% 30 mg and fentanyl 20 micgr ampoule intrathecal
Prilocaine
experimental
bupivacaine heavy 0.5% & fentanyl
bupivacaine heavy 0.5% 7.5 mg and fentanyl 20 micg ampoule intrathecal
Bupivacaine
marcaine heavy 0.5% 7.5 mg intrathecal
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prilocaine
experimental
Bupivacaine
marcaine heavy 0.5% 7.5 mg intrathecal
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* hypersensitivity to study drugs
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ozden Gorgoz Kaban
Medical Doctor Trainee in Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Taylan Akkaya, Assoc Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ministry of Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Camponovo C, Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Cristina D, Fanelli G. A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 60 mg plain 2% prilocaine for intrathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):568-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e30bb8. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
Black AS, Newcombe GN, Plummer JL, McLeod DH, Martin DK. Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):183-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq272. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
Ostgaard G, Hallaraker O, Ulveseth OK, Flaatten H. A randomised study of lidocaine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Apr;44(4):436-40. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440413.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OKabanPrilocain
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.