Prevention of Type II Endoleaks During Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Treatment Versus Combination With Coil Embolisation of the Aneurysmal Sac

NCT ID: NCT01878240

Last Updated: 2020-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) continue to be a leading cause of death in older age groups. In the 60-85 year-old population, AAA represents the 14th-leading cause of death. Federal funding through Medicare has been allocated for early detection using abdominal ultrasound screening programs. Despite these more aggressive screening programs and concerted efforts by surgeons for timely repair, the incidence of ruptured AAA has continued to increase.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been the most common type of repair since 2006. Multiple studies reflecting decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality over open repair make this an attractive option for patients. EVAR requires more intensive follow-up than standard open surgical repair, however. Secondary interventions are more common to maintain "seal" of the endograft within the aorta and subsequent exclusion of the aneurysmal component.

The term endoleak is specific to EVAR, and describes the primary means by which endografts fail. Type I endoleaks occur because of inadequate graft seal proximally or distally, resulting in perigraft flow and aneurysm sac pressurization. Type II endoleaks occur when branch arteries arising from the aneurysmal aorta back-bleed into the aneurysm sac due to collateral flow. Type III endoleaks occur when flow persists between segments of a modular graft. Type IV endoleaks occur when flow persists through endograft material (graft porosity). Type V endoleaks have also been called "endotension", and occur when pressurization of the sac occurs in the absence of any demonstrable endoleak. Type I and Type III endoleaks are most concerning for rupture, although persistent Type II endoleaks can also lead to aneurysm rupture and premature death.

The most common method of EVAR follow-up is computed tomographic angiography (CTA). These studies allow accurate measurement of aneurysm sac diameters and volumes. They also are highly sensitive and specific for endoleaks. Type II endoleaks are treated if they remain persistent and are present in the setting of aneurysm sac enlargement. Type I and III endoleaks are immediately treated when identified. Type IV endoleaks are rarely seen with current endograft technology.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Objectives:

The purpose of the current study is to compare the level of endoleaks between group 1 and 2 at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Study Design Prospective interventional study, multicenter, open, randomized trial comparing the type II endoleak level in patients who benefited the endovascular AAA repair (group 1: without coils) versus combination with coil embolization of the aneurysmal sac (group II: with coils).

The choice of treatment is randomized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EVAR

Endovascular repair of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Coil embolization during EVAR

coil embolization during Endovascular repair

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Coil embolization during endovascular Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm repair

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* Carrying a sub-renal AAA with a diameter of at least 5 cm at a rate of growth or greater 1cm/an diameter (according to Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) recommendations toE VAR treatment),
* Patients with high risk of type II endoleak (clouding of an aortic aneurysm sac by collateral branch), respondents with at least one of the following criteria on the scanner to be included:

* The presence of a pair of permeable lumbar arteries.
* The presence of a patent inferior mesenteric artery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Sub renal Collet \<10 mm
* Angulated \> 60 °
* No collateral arising from the aneurysmal sac
* Iliac aneurysms associated
* Ruptured AAA
* Pregnant Women
* Lack of consent
* Lack of social security
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Henri Mondor University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Unité de Recherche Clinique du Centre chirurgical marie Lannelongue

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dominique FABRE, Vascular surgeon

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital Henri Mondor - APHP

Créteil, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Centre Chirurgical MarieLannelongue

Le Plessis-Robinson, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr, Kohler TR, Kougias P, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM; OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):1988-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207481.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23171095 (View on PubMed)

Jackson RS, Chang DC, Freischlag JA. Comparison of long-term survival after open vs endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1621-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.453.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22511690 (View on PubMed)

Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):863-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9101. Epub 2013 Mar 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23475697 (View on PubMed)

Piazza M, Frigatti P, Scrivere P, Bonvini S, Noventa F, Ricotta JJ 2nd, Grego F, Antonello M. Role of aneurysm sac embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in the prevention of type II endoleak-related complications. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.078. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23384494 (View on PubMed)

Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, Robinson WP, Eslami MH, Goldberg RJ, Messina L. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2848-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014902. Epub 2011 Apr 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21478500 (View on PubMed)

Fabre D, Mougin J, Mitilian D, Cochennec F, Garcia Alonso C, Becquemin JP, Desgranges P, Allaire E, Hamdi S, Brenot P, Bourkaib R, Haulon S. Prospective, Randomised Two Centre Trial of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm With or Without Sac Embolisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;61(2):201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.028. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33342658 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IDRCB 2012-A0125-35

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P12-37813003/2012A01258-35

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.