Ruptured Aorta-iliac Aneurysms: Endo vs. Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00577616

Last Updated: 2014-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

107 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this multicenter randomized trial is to compare the endovascular repair versus conventional repair for ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms observed on CT scan in stable patients with suitable anatomy. The main awaited result is the significant reduction of the mortality of the conventional repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The total death rate of ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms is around 90%. A meta-analysis published by Bown et al. in 2002 in British Journal of Surgery finds on 171 studies compiled since 1955 an operational mortality post of the conventional surgery of 47%. This figure of post-operative mortality seems incompressible since many years in spite of the improvement of the techniques of anaesthesia and the surgery. The endovascular repair of the asymptomatic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta proved to be feasible and effective. In studies with limited and selected patients, the endovascular repair of ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms seems to show a reduction in post-operative mortality in the average of 20%. However, the only comparative study (n=32) could not highlight of significant difference.This justifies a multicentric randomized study of which the goal is to compare the Endovascular repair and the Conventional repair in a cohort of a minimum of 160 patients carrying a Ruptured aorta-iliac Aneurysm(study name: ECAR) observed on CT-scan and being able to profit from the 2 techniques.The emergency does not allow the randomization by patient. The unit of randomization will be the week for each center, one week of endovascular treatment in alternation with one week of treatment by conventional repair and that in a synchronous way for the unit of all the centers of the study. The first week will be devoted to the conventional surgery and will be effective as of the opening of the first center. The principal objective is to compare mortality at 30 days in both groups. The secondary objectives are to compare in the 2 groups:• Morbidity (cardiac, pulmonary, renal, neurological, digestive) at 30 days.• Duration of stay in intensive care unit. The principal awaited results are a significant reduction in the mortality of the endovascular repair compared to the conventional surgery and a reduction in morbidity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ruptured Aorta-iliac Aneurysms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Endovascular repair

Group Type OTHER

Endovascular repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endovascular repair of the asymptomatic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

2

conventional surgery repair

Group Type OTHER

Endovascular repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endovascular repair of the asymptomatic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endovascular repair

Endovascular repair of the asymptomatic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>= 18 years
* Ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms diagnosed by CT
* scan with injection.
* Aneurysm developed on native infra-renal aorta or iliac.

* Non infectious false aneurysms developed on prosthesis (Deleted by amendment n°1 at the request of AFSSAPS)
* Ruptured aneurysm after endoprosthesis (Deleted by amendment n°1 at the request of AFSSAPS)
* Stable hemodynamic condition: systolic blood pressure on arrival higher than 80 mmHg in the absence of continuous vasopressive drugs administration.
* Anatomic criteria :length of aortic proximal neck \>10 mm, diameter of aortic proximal neck \< 32 mm, Absence of aortic neck angulation \> 90° and patent iliac without important stenosis or tortuosity.
* Technical constraints (validation of experience form) : Trained operator (at least 15 endoprosthesis in asymptomatic patients), Endovascular materials at disposal

Exclusion Criteria

* Unstable hemodynamic condition
* Anatomic criteria of non-inclusion
* Asymptomatic aneurysm
* Non-ruptured symptomatic aneurysm or aneurysm complicated with emboli.
* Mycotic aneurysm, infectious false aneurysms
* Post-traumatic aneurysm
* Supra-renal thoracic-abdominal aneurysm
* Impossibility to obtain a CT-scan with injection
* Patient non-affiliated to the social security and the protected people
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pascal Desgranges, PUPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alsac JM, Desgranges P, Kobeiter H, Becquemin JP. Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 Dec;30(6):632-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Aug 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16061405 (View on PubMed)

Desgranges P, Kobeiter H, Katsahian S, Bouffi M, Gouny P, Favre JP, Alsac JM, Sobocinski J, Julia P, Alimi Y, Steinmetz E, Haulon S, Alric P, Canaud L, Castier Y, Jean-Baptiste E, Hassen-Khodja R, Lermusiaux P, Feugier P, Destrieux-Garnier L, Charles-Nelson A, Marzelle J, Majewski M, Bourmaud A, Becquemin JP; ECAR Investigators. Editor's Choice - ECAR (Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anevrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus): A French Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;50(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 May 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26001320 (View on PubMed)

Desgranges P, Kobeiter H, Castier Y, Senechal M, Majewski M, Krimi A. The Endovasculaire vs Chirurgie dans les Anevrysmes Rompus PROTOCOL trial update. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):267-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.128.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20117503 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K060216

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AOM06055

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial II
NCT01668563 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Endovascular Repair of AAA
NCT05808439 UNKNOWN
Female Aneurysm Screening STudy
NCT03277781 COMPLETED
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms
NCT06267573 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
The (PIVOTAL) Study
NCT00444821 TERMINATED NA