Effect of Ovarian Stimulation With r-hLH/r-hFSH,r-hFSH and hMG in Reducing Apoptosis Rate in Cumulus Cells of Patients Undergoing ICSI

NCT ID: NCT01872247

Last Updated: 2013-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

61 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

HP-hMG, recombinant FSH (r-hFSH) and a combination of r-hFSH/r-hLH, are commonly used for ovarian stimulation in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatments. Several publications have compared the effectiveness of these compounds, in terms of clinical outcomes.

The aim of our study is to investigate the effects of three different ovarian stimulation protocols (HP-hMG, r-hFSH and r-hFSH/r-hLH), in a pilot prospective observational study, evaluating the effects of recombinant LH and extractive hCG (with LH like activity) on the biological outcome as well as on the clinical outcome. We will use the apoptosis rate of the cumulus cell, usually discarded after oocyte collection, as molecular biomarker to assess the oocyte quality, as biological outcome. The clinical outcome was estimated measuring implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates within and between the three different ovarian stimulation protocols

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

HP-hMG, recombinant FSH (r-hFSH) and a combination of r-hFSH/r-hLH, are commonly used for ovarian stimulation in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatments. Several publications have compared the effectiveness of these compounds, in terms of clinical outcomes . Most of the studies have been performed in women undergoing pituitary down-regulation with a GnRH agonist long protocol, focusing on the outcome after r-hFSH and HP-hMG ovarian stimulation . Two meta-analyses showed a better outcome in terms of live birth rate for HP-hMG ovarian stimulation compared to r-hFSH in the GnRH agonist long protocol. These studies mainly compare different dose regimen of the two drugs used in the same clinical population, r-hFSH and HP-hMG. Recently other two clinical randomized studies compared, in a non-inferiority design, the same dose regimen of the two drugs. The results confirmed non inferiority of the HP-hMG formulation in terms of pregnancy rate compared to the r-hFSH formulations, but significantly higher drug consumption and lower yield in oocyte recovery.

In clinical practice HP-hMG is a clinical favored treatment when LH activity is requested for the ovarian stimulation success, due to LH activity guaranteed by extractive hCG added to this formulation.

Several studies have addressed the issue of the need or convenience of adding LH activity to FSH in ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI-ET in order to increase clinical outcomes in IVF/ICSI cycles , but they have not been able to address the role that LH administration plays during the follicular phase of a stimulated cycle for IVF-ET under pituitary suppression. In the case of r-hFSH administration, in normo-gonadotrophic patients, low levels of endogenous LH can persist despite pituitary down-regulation with GnRH analogues. It is known that only 1% of LH receptors need to be occupied to drive adequate ovarian steroidogenesis for reproduction. But the potential benefit of additional exogenous LH supplementation in ART is still controversial .

Different meta-analyses did not demonstrate any benefit of the r-hLH supplementation in increasing clinical outcome . However, in patients of advanced age undergoing ART, likely to include a larger proportion of poor responders, the addition of r-hLH seems to be beneficial .

In a previous study, the investigators demonstrated that r-hLH supplementation during ovarian stimulation, significantly reduces apoptosis in the cumulus cells, improving oocyte competence that is necessary for adequate fertilization and the consecutive embryogenesis that ends with implantation.

Given this background, it seems appropriate to investigate the effects of three different ovarian stimulation protocols (HP-hMG, r-hFSH and r-hFSH/r-hLH), used as routine in the ovarian stimulation therapy, in a pilot prospective observational study, evaluating the effects of recombinant LH and extractive hCG (with LH like activity) on the biological outcome as well as on the clinical outcome. The apoptosis rate of the cumulus cell, usually discarded after oocyte collection, was used as molecular biomarker to assess the oocyte quality, as biological outcome. The clinical outcome was estimated measuring implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates within and between the three different ovarian stimulation protocols

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* normal basal level of FSH (\< 12 IU/mL)
* normal body mass index (BMI = kg/m2 \< 28)
* poor or hyporesponse in a previous cycle according to Bologna criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* Azoospermia
* Endometriosis
* recurrent abortion
* recurrent failures after IVF
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centro di Biologia della Riproduzione, Palermo, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giovanni Ruvolo, Biologist

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centro di Biologia della Riproduzione, Palermo, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centro di Biologia della Riproduzione

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carone D, Caropreso C, Vitti A, Chiappetta R. Efficacy of different gonadotropin combinations to support ovulation induction in WHO type I anovulation infertility: clinical evidences of human recombinant FSH/human recombinant LH in a 2:1 ratio and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation protocols. J Endocrinol Invest. 2012 Dec;35(11):996-1002. doi: 10.3275/8657. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23095369 (View on PubMed)

Ruvolo G, Bosco L, Pane A, Morici G, Cittadini E, Roccheri MC. Lower apoptosis rate in human cumulus cells after administration of recombinant luteinizing hormone to women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization procedures. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.059. Epub 2006 Nov 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17126339 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

apoptosis2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.