Acute Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Sling vs. Splint

NCT ID: NCT01869322

Last Updated: 2024-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2022-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When people break their arm and arrive at Oregon Health and Science University's Emergency Department (OHSU ED), they are treated with a short-term means of immobilizing their broken arm. The two most common ways of stabilizing the broken parts of the arm are 1) with a plaster-based coaptation splint, or 2) with a soft cloth sling and swathe. These hold the arm steady until the patient can schedule an appointment with the OHSU Orthopaedic Trauma clinic where they will receive definitive evaluation and stabilization/fixation. In much of the orthopaedic literature coaptation splints are the default immobilization method. The investigators hypothesize however, that sling and swathe immobilization may be equally effective for short term stabilization, while being faster to apply, and more comfortable for the patient. This randomized, unblinded prospective study will follow the satisfaction, quality of life and limited functional outcomes of all enrolled participants during the first week following their injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fracture of Shaft of Humerus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sling and Swathe

In this arm, study subjects will receive sling and swathe immobilization for humeral shaft fracture.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sling and Swathe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sling and Swathe immobilization of humeral shaft fracture.

Coaptation Splint

In this arm participants receive a coaptation splint for humeral shaft fracture.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Coaptation Splint

Intervention Type DEVICE

Coaptation splint immobilization of humeral shaft fractures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sling and Swathe

Sling and Swathe immobilization of humeral shaft fracture.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Coaptation Splint

Coaptation splint immobilization of humeral shaft fractures.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 18-80
* acute midshaft humeral fracture within 48 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* ED presentation more than 48 hours after injury
* Head injury
* Open fracture
* Pathological fracture
* Known pregnancy
* Inmate or prisoner
* Non-English speaking
* Sexual Assault (SA) victim
* Patient and Legally Authorized Representative unable to provide consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Darin Friess, M.D., M.P.H.

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Darin Friess, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00009456

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Long-Arm vs Sugar-Tong
NCT03724773 WITHDRAWN NA
Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4
Mallet Finger Splinting Study
NCT01388751 COMPLETED NA