DTI of the Brain and Cervical Spine: Evaluation in Normal Subjects and Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
NCT ID: NCT01868958
Last Updated: 2015-07-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
26 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-01-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Variation in Anisotropy of the Spinal Cord in Patients With Hyperkyphosis
NCT05987150
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on Young and Middle-aged Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Pain
NCT06217029
Quantitative MR Parameters in Non-myelopathic Degenerative Cervical Spinal Cord Compression: a Longitudinal Study.
NCT06094166
Non-Motor Features of Cervical Dystonia (CD)
NCT03471923
Predictors of Outcome and Natural History in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
NCT02936245
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is sensitive to the motion of water and is considered to be a marker for axonal integrity in the brain. There has been much interest in applying the technique to the spine and in particular to the evaluation of patients with CSM. In the brain DTI is performed using a single shot echo planar imaging (SS-EPI) sequence which acquires all of the data for a single slice following the application of a single excitation pulse and diffusion gradients. While very efficient in terms of data collections there are several problems with SS-EPI, notably that 1) It is best suited to the acquisition of relatively small imaging matrices, resulting in either low spatial resolution or the use of additional techniques to reduce the field of view (FOV). Increasing the number of echoes acquired to increase the resolution does not produce an increase in the acquired resolution since the decay of the signal during the longer echo train results in increased blurring of the image. 2) The images are distorted by susceptibility gradients in areas close to the interfaces between tissue and bone or osseous structures. These factors have made applying DTI to clinical studies of the spine problematic. Specifically:-
1. The small size of the spinal cord means that high spatial resolution is required.
2. The susceptibility effects from the surrounding osseous structure result in image distortion.
3. The motion of the cord during the cardiac cycle leads to artifacts.
Readout segmented EPI (RESOLVE or RS-EPI) sequence has been shown to be capable of obtaining images with higher spatial resolution and reduced distortion in the brain. We have recently demonstrated that the RESOLVE sequence can also be used to obtain high quality DTI images of the cervical spine of volunteers (see figure 1) and can provide clinically useful information in subjects with metastases in the spine. The RESOLVE sequence breaks the data collection into several segments, resulting in reduced distortion and the potential to obtain images with higher resolution, but at the cost of either increased scan time or a reduced number of directions for the diffusion gradients (i.e. reduced signal to noise ratio (SNR)). The RESOLVE sequence also incorporates real-time assessment of the data, enabling data corrupted by motion to be rejected and then reacquired. We now wish to optimize, and assess the clinical utility of, the RESOLVE sequence in patients with CSM by applying it to a group of CSM patients and a group of aged matched control subjects. The raw diffusion images are post-processed to yield parametric images which characterize the diffusivity (mean, longitudinal and radial) and anisotropy (directional dependence) of the diffusion. The anisotropy of the diffusion data is typically quantified using the fractional anisotropy (FA) index, however, we have recently shown that two other quantities, the mode and ellipsoidal area ratio (EAR) of the diffusion tensor, provide useful supplementary information and we propose to use all three parameters when analyzing the anisotropy of the diffusion data from this study.
Using the RESOLVE sequence address these first two of the "bullet" points listed above and we found that in some subjects high quality DTI images of the spine can be obtained without the use of cardiac gating, however, for a robust clinical sequence we, and other groups, have found cardiac gating to be essential. Another issue to consider for DTI studies of the spine is the orientation of the scan. Sagittal images provide coverage of the whole spine with relatively few slices, which is particularly beneficial when cardiac gating is employed. Axial slices have the advantage that the changes in the configuration of the spine in the caudal-cranial direction are relatively slow, meaning that thicker slices can be used without a significant loss of information. However, a relatively large number of slices are still required to cover the entire C-spine resulting in a lengthy measurement time when cardiac gating is used.
Objectives The investigators wish to try and answer the following questions for the C-spine:-
1. What are the diffusion characteristic of the normal C-spine (spatial variation and age dependence)?
2. How do the RESOLVE and SS-EPI images of the spine compare in terms of image quality?
3. What is the effect of changing the number of segments for the RESOLVE sequence?
4. When comparing SS-EPI and RESOLVE are there statistically significant differences in the derived values of anisotropy or diffusivity?
5. Are the diffusion characteristics of the C-spine of subjects with CSM significantly different from those of aged matched controls?
6. Can DTI of the spine be used to derive diagnostic information, either in terms of prognostic information for individual CSM patients or the identification of sub-groups of CSM patients? For the brain the question we would be addressing are:-
1\) When comparing SS-EPI and RESOLVE are there statistically significant differences in the derived values of anisotropy or diffusivity? 2) Is there a statistically significant difference in the volume of the fiber tracts derived using the two sequences or between the two groups? 3) Is the diffusion data from the brains of patients with CSM significantly different from that of the controls?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CSM subjects
Subjects with clinical indications of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
No interventions assigned to this group
Control group
Aged matched to the CSM group but with no signs of CSM
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 20 controls : Aged matched to the patient group. No history of CSM.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any history of neurological disease
* Dental braces or similar orthodontic devices.
* Claustrophobia
30 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Siemens Medical Solutions
INDUSTRY
Emory University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Richard Jones
Assistant professor of Radiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard A Jones, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Radiology, Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Center for Systems Imaging (CSI), Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hayes LL, Jones RA, Palasis S, Aguilera D, Porter DA. Drop metastases to the pediatric spine revealed with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Aug;42(8):1009-13. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2295-9. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00058267
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.