Implementation of Evidence-based Psychotherapy for PTSD

NCT ID: NCT01861769

Last Updated: 2014-11-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Approximately 9% of Canadians will have Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in their lifetime. In the military veteran population, the lifetime prevalence of PTSD has been estimated to be as high as 20%. Numerous research studies have demonstrated that short-term, cognitive-behavioral psychotherapies, such as Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), lead to substantial improvements in PTSD symptoms. However, research suggests that a minority of clinicians provide these therapies in clinical settings. The transfer of this research knowledge into clinical settings remains one of the largest hurdles to improving the health of Canadians with PTSD.

It is well established that attending a 2-day workshop on these therapies alone is insufficient to promote adequate knowledge transfer and sustained skillful use. The current study aims to contrast whether two forms of post-workshop support (6-month duration), with different levels of expert oversight, will result in superior levels of clinician skill and patient outcomes versus no formal post-workshop support. The three forms of post-workshop support are 1) technology-enhanced group tele-consultation 2) standard group tele-consultation 3) no tele consultation. The primary and secondary outcomes will be the assessment of the clinicians' competence in CPT and patient symptoms,respectively. This study will inform how best to transfer evidence based therapy outcomes to the clinical milieu to attain comparable outcomes as those observed in research.

The investigators' hypotheses are as follows: Hypothesis 1:The technology enhanced group tele-consultation condition will evidence the highest levels of fidelity, the standard group tele-consultation condition will evidence intermediate levels of fidelity, and the no-consultation/fidelity monitoring only condition will evidence the lowest fidelity. Hypothesis 2: Fidelity to the CPT protocol, irrespective of consultation condition, will be positively associated with improved client outcomes. Hypothesis 3: Organizational context variables, such as the organizational climate and readiness for change, will influence the uptake of CPT skills, as well as the extent to which these skills are utilized in practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Technology-enhanced Teleconsultation

Technology-enhanced Group Tele-consultation. This consultation method requires that participants be prepared to review and receive feedback on audiorecorded CPT sessions in a group format. The CPT expert randomly selects two clinician sessions each week that have been audiorecorded to use for feedback and discussion in group teleconference based on procedures used in previous training initiatives (Stirman, Bhar, et al., 2010). Five- to twenty-minute segments of the two sessions will be shared within the group consultation. The CPT expert will provide feedback on the sessions with an emphasis on review of key learning points. These consultation group sessions will be facilitated with collaborative meeting software that includes audio file uploading.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Technology-enhanced Teleconsultation

Intervention Type OTHER

Technology-enhanced Group Tele-consultation. This consultation method requires that participants be prepared to review and receive feedback on audiorecorded CPT sessions in a group format. The CPT expert randomly selects two clinician sessions each week that have been audiorecorded to use for feedback and discussion in group teleconference based on procedures used in previous training initiatives (Stirman, Bhar, et al., 2010). Five- to twenty-minute segments of the two sessions will be shared within the group consultation. The CPT expert will provide feedback on the sessions with an emphasis on review of key learning points. These consultation group sessions will be facilitated with collaborative meeting software that includes audio file uploading.

Standard Teleconsultation

Standard Tele-consultation Group. The CPT expert will randomly select clinicians for case presentation each week. Each clinician will be responsible for verbally presenting on their CPT cases throughout the 6-month period of consultation course. No audiorecorded content will be reviewed within the calls. All other procedures used in the above condition will be used here.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard Teleconsultation

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard Tele-consultation Group. The CPT expert will randomly select clinicians for case presentation each week. Each clinician will be responsible for verbally presenting on their CPT cases throughout the 6-month period of consultation course. No audiorecorded content will be reviewed within the calls. All other procedures used in the above condition will be used here.

No consultation

No Consultation/Fidelity Monitoring Only. Participants assigned to this condition will receive no post-workshop expert consultation, but will be subject to the same audiorecorded session-uploading and client-outcome reporting as the other conditions. This condition allows us to assess the effect of clinicians knowing that their sessions are subject to fidelity assessment.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Technology-enhanced Teleconsultation

Technology-enhanced Group Tele-consultation. This consultation method requires that participants be prepared to review and receive feedback on audiorecorded CPT sessions in a group format. The CPT expert randomly selects two clinician sessions each week that have been audiorecorded to use for feedback and discussion in group teleconference based on procedures used in previous training initiatives (Stirman, Bhar, et al., 2010). Five- to twenty-minute segments of the two sessions will be shared within the group consultation. The CPT expert will provide feedback on the sessions with an emphasis on review of key learning points. These consultation group sessions will be facilitated with collaborative meeting software that includes audio file uploading.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard Teleconsultation

Standard Tele-consultation Group. The CPT expert will randomly select clinicians for case presentation each week. Each clinician will be responsible for verbally presenting on their CPT cases throughout the 6-month period of consultation course. No audiorecorded content will be reviewed within the calls. All other procedures used in the above condition will be used here.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinician participants (n=120) recruited for this study will either be Operation Stress Injury (OSI) network clinicians, Operational Trauma and Stress Support Centre (OTSSC) network clinicians or community-based clinicians who treat military-related PTSD.
* Both male and female clinician participants will be recruited;
* Clinician participants will be greater than 18 years.

Mental health clinicians from the clinics and private practitioners will be eligible to participate in the study if they:

1. attend the CPT workshop;
2. are employees of an OSI or OTSSC clinic, are registered VAC clinicians, or are in private practice treating individuals with military-related PTSD;
3. currently provide psychotherapy to military soldiers or veterans with PTSD;
4. consent to be randomized to one of the three study conditions; and,
5. are willing to solicit patient participation.

Eligible patient participants are:

1. client of the clinician participant, who has a diagnosis of PTSD, as determined by clinician independent assessment, and total PCL score equal or greater to 45; and
2. willing to consent to have their sessions audiorecorded and listened to by a fidelity rater and potentially other clinicians teaching and learning CPT. Patients are permitted to continue other psychotherapeutic interventions if not specifically focused on treating PTSD symptoms. Patient participants must be over the age of 18.

Exclusion Criteria

Ineligible patients will include those not eligible for CPT based on the state of research evidence, including those with:

1. current uncontrolled psychotic or bipolar disorder;
2. unremitted substance dependence diagnosis (substance abuse allowed);
3. current imminent suicidality or homicidality that requires imminent attention; and
4. significant cognitive impairment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Toronto Metropolitan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Candice Monson

Professor & Director of Clinical Training

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Candice Monson, Ph D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Toronto Metropolitan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Edmonton Operational Stress Injury Clinic

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wiltsey Stirman S, Shields N, Deloriea J, Landy MS, Belus JM, Maslej MM, Monson CM. A randomized controlled dismantling trial of post-workshop consultation strategies to increase effectiveness and fidelity to an evidence-based psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 1;8:82. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-82.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23902798 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIHR 2011-03-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive Therapy for PTSD in Addiction Treatment
NCT00685451 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2